Jump to content

We're #6! We're #6!

Recommended Posts

Just found this today. Perhaps it's irrelevant or old news...

As of 2009, Houston ranked relative to other US cities by the EPA:

#6 in terms of number of energy-star buildings (133)

#2 in total floorspace of these buildings (64 million sq. ft.)

#3 in total cost savings ($73.9 million)

#1 in "emissions prevented" (53,400 homes equivalence)

Houston dropped from #3 in number of buildings to #6 this year. I would think one of the other measures is more relevant, but what do I know...?

Source here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of this has to do with that we've simply had so many more buildings constructed here in recent years than have been constructed in other parts of the country. ...which is ironic, because the greenest city is one whose economy and population are shrinking.

Admittedly, it helps that the City of Houston has adopted a particularly stringent Energy Code. On the other hand, Energy Star and LEED don't exactly adjust for differences in climate, so a 'green' building here may not be as 'green' as one in a more temperate locale.

Edited by TheNiche
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...