hindesky Posted September 25 Share Posted September 25 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Some one Posted September 25 Share Posted September 25 How long until Whitmire pauses this one for "further review." 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hindesky Posted September 27 Author Share Posted September 27 https://www.h-gac.com/uploads/transportation-project-questionnaire/1211-Navigation-Combined-Materials.pdf 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TXK Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 I expected not to like the median bikeway but the design looks like it could be nice. I'm glad they measured speeding vehicles because it matches with what I see here every day, there are a lot of people flying down Navigation, including through school zones. Also a ton of trucks and other industrial vehicles especially the further east you go. So I'd be a little wary of conflicts in the intersections because of that, but the path itself looks great. The only really disappointing part is the inclusion of more on-street parking on Navigation. I'm having a hard time imaging Navigation traffic becoming calm enough to where on street parallel parking would be more of a benefit than a burden. Does the approval mean this is already funded by Precinct 2, or is it a project/design approval and funding and planning are still needed? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_cuevas713 Posted October 30 Share Posted October 30 This is a county project, correct? If it is, Whitmire can't do a damn thing . 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.