Jump to content

Fitch

Full Member
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Fitch

  1. Oh. My. God. Is the way you type how your brain actually processes the English language? 

     

     

    There's not a single rational point made in the entire collection of posts. The closest thing to a coherent opinion that doesn't flip flop every other line is "big ass highways aren't ugly, mmkay... 

     

    Let's just clarify a few things:

    • The project is moving forward. 
    • Nothing shy of a collapse of the Texas economy will stop that.
    • It will be beneficial for the City - yes some areas stand to benefit more than others - that's been true since the dawn of time. 
    • The Pierce Elevated needs to be entirely wrecked down.
    • Highways are going to always be ugly pieces of necessary infrastructure.
    • The best decision TXDOT has made is trying to hide as much of the roadway as possible to blend downtown and the East End into one contiguous urban grid. 

    For those who care to talk about actual project details - I found it interesting that the land under the interchange at 59/69/45/10 and Buffalo Bayou will be a set of detention basins. With that type of space right on the bayou I would imagine that the Buffalo Bayou Partnership will be able to program a green space or park to connect the west and east park systems. Also interesting that they're planning for possibly two bayou bypasses. 

     

    kUvEQMv.jpg

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  2. The vertical clearances and railroad are all very valid points, but I think the reason that it has not been added to the plan is more actuarial than engineering :)

     

     

    As it is today, Canal Street is barricaded at the railroad tracts paralleling US 59, and has been for some time, so the TXDOT engineers must look at that and presume that the road can safely be truncated without irritating anyone. If we were living in the neighborhood a couple of years ago that well may have been the case, but the reality is that the area just east of Downtown is starting to experience a dramatic amount of densification that doesn't get picked up in the census rolls. 

     

    Add to that Canal Street shrinks from four lanes to two on the north side of Navigation/Jensen. For my suggestion to work the city would need to be able to expand the right of way to fit the full four lanes to cross over. That said, I think that's achievable since you're just talking about dealing with one vacant piece of land (as opposed to all of the blocks in EaDo that have virtually new buildings on them). 

     

    It would be very interesting to see a cross section of the suppressed highway at the Canal Street plane. 

     

×
×
  • Create New...