Jump to content

Politics beyond the pale...


nmainguy

Recommended Posts

OK. I get it's politikin' time but some things are just beyond the pale. What's up with this clueless moron and what was he thinking using a room full of kids to shield him in the ongoing republican pedophile cover-up scandal? You'd think a guy who's up to his ears in the cover-up and finger pointing game among his fellow GOP [Gang of Pedophiles] leadership would have caught a clue?

Buffalo, NY - Republican Tom Reynolds rented out a daycare facility today as he surrounded himself with kids and families, using them as protection from tough questions about specifics into the Foley messages.

%7Boption%7DReporter: Congressman, do you mind asking the children to leave the room so we can have a frank discussion of this, because it's an adult topic. It just doesn't seem appropriate to me.

Reynolds: I'll take your questions, but I'm not going to ask any of my supporters to leave.

Reporter: Who are the children, Congressman? Who are these children?

Reynolds: Pardon me?

Reporter: Who are these children?

Reynolds: Well, a number of them are from the community. There are several of the "thirtysomething" set that are here and uh I've known them and I've known their children as they were born.

Reporter: Do you think it's appropriate for them to be listening to the subject matter though?

Reynolds: Sir, I'll be happy to answer your questions, I'm still, uh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say that I find what Foley has done to be indefensible. It is without question a heinous act, and I believe the full letter of the law should be extended to Mr.Foley. Not just the letter, but the whole DAMN BOOK ! An old perverted homosexual, lurking around our hallowed halls of lawmaking, that has been using his power to flirt with underaged young men , almost children, for who knows how long, is disgusting. Not to mention, with the other goings on around this country, with the school shootings by perverted heterosexual pedophiles <-edit-- and such, it just makes me scared to death, and question as to how the hell am I supposed to protect my children ? Lock this worm up and throw away the key. Don't kid yourself about these just being accusations, I have full confidence that this P.O.S. has done something to somebody's child, at some part in his career.

Alot of Foley's backers are trying to say he has been setup. "Why would a teenager keep such emails and text messages, if they were soooo embarrassing ?" Simple, the teenager didn't, I am sure he deleted them, but they don't truly get "Deleted" they are still there, and if you want to find them or bring them back up, any computer savvy individual can get them. Bottom line is that Foley wasn't setup, he set himself up, he engaged or initiated those conversations, he wrote those words, and they weren't taken out of context. Now he goes and hides in an Alcohol Rehab so noone can ask any questions for 30 days ? How convenient ? Does he truly believe that everyone is just gonna forget about it in 30 days. Gimme a break !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the issue is that he is a pedaphile and misused his position, not his homosexuality. Did you refer to Clinton as "an old perverted breeder" when he was caught with his pants down?

At least with Clinton and Monica, it was two consenting heterosexuals.

In 1983 heterosexual congressman Crane had sex with a 17 yo female page and homosexual congressman Studds had sex with a 17 yo male page proving pedophilia knows no sexual orientation.

What I find perverted and almost pornographic is the house leadership enabling Foley instead of catching a clue and protecting the kids instead of their asses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to hijack the thread, but pedophilia in it's strictest sense involves a sexual interest in prepubescent children. a 16 year old is rarely, if ever, prepubescent. In fact, in Washington, DC, the age of consent is 16. Though Foley's actions indicate an intent to commit a homosexual act, the outrage should be, and generally is, at his using his position of authority to prey on pages. In that sense, it is compared to the actions of a pedophile, but it should be more comparable to a police officer who preys upon his arrestee, or a teacher who preys upon his students.

In any event, we are once again presented with government "leaders" who are only in office for the power, and, who are more interested in staying in power than serving the citizens that elected them. We have only ourselves to blame for allowing our government to be sold to the highest bidder. This will only continue, until we as a nation declare the people more important than money.

I do not see that change on the horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<_<

i wish a reporter had asked a disgusting question, upsetting

reynolds into saying that such language is inappropriate or

indecent for children...

<_<

also, those mothers are stupid to stand up there and use

their children as press props.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to hijack the thread, but pedophilia in it's strictest sense involves a sexual interest in prepubescent children.

Red is right. The correct term would be "Ephebophilia".

Regardless of what we call it, it still amounts to a grown man taking advantage of his postion and the leadership that enables his behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the issue is that he is a pedaphile and misused his position, not his homosexuality. Did you refer to Clinton as "an old perverted breeder" when he was caught with his pants down?

Yes YES, you are totally correct. I meant to edit my earlier post to read that the school shootings were committed by PERVERTED HETEROSEXUAL PEDOPHILES, who also appear to have been molested as children. I had to leave work for a little bit and was unable to do so, and I have just made it back to my computer. I was thinking about the post as I was driving, and I knew I would get called to the mat on it. I apologize West and Nmain, and all other GLBs on this forum. I did not mean to make it seem like he did it because he was a Homosexual, I apologize. In my haste to post, and being very upset over this issue with all these wrongdoings, I wanted to show that ANYONE is capable of such acts, and isn't it about time we got really mad, and made tougher laws on these EVIL, VILE, PUTRID, scumbags ? :angry2::angry2::angry2:

btw, I did not know Clinton was chasing after Pages also, thanks for the 411 West. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes YES, you are totally correct. I meant to edit my earlier post to read that the school shootings were committed by PERVERTED HETEROSEXUAL PEDOPHILES, who also appear to have been molested as children. I had to leave work for a little bit and was unable to do so, and I have just made it back to my computer. I was thinking about the post as I was driving, and I knew I would get called to the mat on it. I apologize West and Nmain, and all other GLBs on this forum. I did not mean to make it seem like he did it because he was a Homosexual, I apologize. In my haste to post, and being very upset over this issue with all these wrongdoings, I wanted to show that ANYONE is capable of such acts, and isn't it about time we got really mad, and made tougher laws on these EVIL, VILE, PUTRID, scumbags ? :angry2::angry2::angry2:

btw, I did not know Clinton was chasing after Pages also, thanks for the 411 West. ;)

Apology accepted. I really knew what you meant but I couldn't let it go by w/o correction. And I was talking about Monica not a page. Bill likes them a little older and heavi....errrr....more voluptuous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Politics at it's worst. Democrats are being completely stoopid by getting into this, this fire needed no stoking to become an inferno and only gives credence to the conservative commentators out there calling them hypocrites for calling the republicans hypocrites. I think Rush is even stooping low enough to float a theory that this was all a setup by democrats who got the page to seduce Foley through IM. Classy Rush, very classy.

I can't remember where I read it this morning, but I think the commentary of the day came from the commentator who was calling Hastert out for saying he thought the emails weren't anything more than over-friendly. The commentator asked to think about what would happen if you saw an email to your 16 yo son from a 52 yo man asking for his picture, saying they doubt you as the father would think the same as Hastert and the other congressmen who knew about it thought. The commentator theoried that most fathers would be more likely to wonder if Foley has good health insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Politics at it's worst. Democrats are being completely stoopid by getting into this, this fire needed no stoking to become an inferno and only gives credence to the conservative commentators out there calling them hypocrites for calling the republicans hypocrites. I think Rush is even stooping low enough to float a theory that this was all a setup by democrats who got the page to seduce Foley through IM. Classy Rush, very classy.

I can't remember where I read it this morning, but I think the commentary of the day came from the commentator who was calling Hastert out for saying he thought the emails weren't anything more than over-friendly. The commentator asked to think about what would happen if you saw an email to your 16 yo son from a 52 yo man asking for his picture, saying they doubt you as the father would think the same as Hastert and the other congressmen who knew about it thought. The commentator theoried that most fathers would be more likely to wonder if Foley has good health insurance.

The only thing I've heard from any Democrat is the same thing I'm hearing from some Republicans: What did Hasert, Boehner and Reynolds know, when did they know it and what the hell were they thinking when they tried to cover it up? It's a legitimate question. Anyway, the Democrats know it's not polite to interfere while the Republicans are eating their own.

As far as Limbaugh goes, he's just another whack-job junkie flapping his lips between spikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I've heard from any Democrat is the same thing I'm hearing from some Republicans: What did Hasert, Boehner and Reynolds know, when did they know it and what the hell were they thinking when they tried to cover it up? It's a legitimate question. Anyway, the Democrats know it's not polite to interfere while the Republicans are eating their own.

As far as Limbaugh goes, he's just another whack-job junkie flapping his lips between spikes.

:lol::lol::lol: "eating their own." you unbelievable bast....... :ph34r::P:lol:

I am a little mad at El Rushbo, "a set up."? C'mon cheif.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh Brother ! I can see what the other media links are gonna say about that.

"sweetJeseusIhatebilloreilly.com". Gotta be the best dot com name I've heard. :D

:lol::lol::lol: "eating their own." you unbelievable bast....... :ph34r::P:lol:

I am a little mad at El Rushbo, "a set up."? C'mon cheif.

"eating their own". Not bad. I like the one "the GOP is engaged in a circular firing squad."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless what the current spin is, the topic is about pedophilia [Ephebophilia actually], not homosexuality. The Republicans should be wary of going down this path at the expense of exposing the leader of their party-Ken Mehlman and the chairman of the House Rules Committee David Dreier...among other less prominent gays and lesbians. It would be 8 kinds of stupid to go down that path if they intend to keep these guys-and gals-closeted from the general public. They would serve their cause and quite frankly they'd be serving their country if they expelled the Speaker and his cohorts for enabling Foley's behavior...oh yeah, that goes double for any Democrat who knew but didn't tell.

Don't any of these people have kids??? :wacko:

Edit: speaking of 8 kinds of stupid, the White House might want to pull Laura Bush and her fundraisers for Tom Reynolds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...