sevfiv Posted September 1, 2006 Share Posted September 1, 2006 http://sustainlane.com/article/847/number 39 - is this even on target?SustainLane talked with officials at 37 of the cities in the study and brought together more than 1,700 data points. Our goal has been to gather information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest danax Posted September 1, 2006 Share Posted September 1, 2006 They rank San Francisco #2 overall but rank their affordability at 2nd worst and metro congestion at 3rd worst? I think their weighting of categories needs some adjusting. Is water quality much of an issue anymore? The yuppies drink bottled water and the poor people drink soda pop. And we get dumped in the mud by not growing our own food and having weather too hot for jogging, no zoning and having occasional hurricanes and floods. It is a shame that our air quality is horrible and the polluters and government enablers are criminals. We need some more parks to freshen the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.