MidtownCoog Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 Living here seems like a self-imposed hardship. Would y'all live here? ------------------------------ Banking on apartments at Republic Tower In about 18 months, the 36-story Republic National Bank tower will become home for hundreds of downtown residents. Downtown Dallas' Republic National Bank tower has been a business landmark for a half-century. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dw...c.13bc1ebf.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 I would. It's a great location, and a really cool building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 Living here seems like a self-imposed hardship. Would y'all live here?A hardship in what way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 It doesn't show in the picture, but doesn't one of the buildings have a rocket-ship spire? The Rebublic Bank logo was incorporated into the metal panels on the side of the towers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 It doesn't show in the picture, but doesn't one of the buildings have a rocket-ship spire? The Rebublic Bank logo was incorporated into the metal panels on the side of the towers.Yeah thats the one.The developer plans to incorporate the history of this building in the promotion for the apartments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 Self imposed hardship as in:1. Want to walk the dog? Better pack a lunch.2. No balconies!3. Bringing home groceries is akin to checking into a hotel. 4. It looks like a prison. 5. It may have history, but it lacks a soul.6. It's apartments! Who wants to live in an apartment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Self imposed hardship as in:1. Want to walk the dog? Better pack a lunch. 2. No balconies! 3. Bringing home groceries is akin to checking into a hotel. 4. It looks like a prison. 5. It may have history, but it lacks a soul. 6. It's apartments! Who wants to live in an apartment? This is a picture of the building prior to rennovation of course!!!!!! Common Sense= PRICELESS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 No plans for balconies. Only windows that will open. What a concept. And why would they change the outside if its such a "classic" American design?Decorative crowns will not fool me. They may work for you. I bet you also live in an apartment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Different strokes for different folks. If the people moving here didn't consider all of the things you listed before moving in, then I think that they should have moved to Plano,Richardson, Garland, Rowlett,or any other one of our(as some will say) choking, landlocking,sprawling mammoth sized satelite cities......It will suit them better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
713 To 214 Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 It certainly is a matter of preference. I think someone is just salty. I'm sure he/she will make him/herself known. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firstngoal Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 No plans for balconies. Only windows that will open. What a concept. And why would they change the outside if its such a "classic" American design?Decorative crowns will not fool me. They may work for you. I bet you also live in an apartment.I agree with MidtownCoog... AND this is not an anti-Dallas statement (let me go ahead and make that clear from the onset). I would not live in a former office building... for the same reason I would have no desire to live in the former Rice Hotel in Downtown Houston. I want to live in a residential neighborhood where I can walk out my door and take my dog for a walk and have quick access to the goods and services I use on a frequent basis. I don't want my life connected via elevator to the rest of the world... nor do I want to have to pay a premium (which you will in this redevelopment!) to be inconvenienced and live in a world of concrete and steel. Thanksgiving Plaza is not reason enough for me to live in this section of downtown Dallas. I'm glad Dallas is attempting to redevelop its downtown office buildings... but this concept is just not for me (which was the original question, right?).Not sure why the "common sense" knock was inserted into this dialogue... I think it makes plenty of sense that some people may not want to rent... or live in a 40-story former office tower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 It will suit them better This is not NYC or London. You can still live in the city center without locking yourself in an old office building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firstngoal Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 I agree with MidtownCoog... AND this is not an anti-Dallas statement (let me go ahead and make that clear from the onset). ...and I don't live in the suburbs, by the way. Just a very happy resident of the Montrose area... five minutes (by bike) into the heart of the Houston CBD. One last thing (trail of thoughts here, sorry!)... I lived in Dallas for four years... and was mugged and robbed just three blocks from this Gables redevelopment. While I would never blame Dallas overall for what happened (and I liked living there), I would add public safety as a concern (to MidtownCoog's list) for this immediate area. New housing units will help on the safety front... but for someone that likes to be outside (and has dogs)... I don't think I could recommend walking around these buildings frequently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 I should also mention that I would not live in the converted buildings in downtown Houston, either.My original question was from a quality of life perspective, and from the perspective of the investors.Would you gamble $46mil on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
713 To 214 Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 when was the last time you visited that area? I think you'll find it has changed for the better over time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 This is not NYC or London. You can still live in the city center without locking yourself in an old office building. I agree with you totaly, It's probablyThousands of people that feel the same way you do. But when this thing sells out, then we will know that there is at least 500 people that feel different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 I keep reading about Dallas' CBD and how so many firms have left for the burbs (Frito Lay, EDS, JCP, MCI).In Houston, a major selling point of living in the city is to be close to work.I wonder if Republic Tower residents will live downtown to be near work, or just becuase its neat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Apparently the economics of rehabilitating old office buildings into apartments can be pretty good, since the structural elements stay in place. With any luck this will inspire more projects, like the old Holiday Inn downtown. I really love the metal facing on the exterior. Houston has a similar design with the Travis Tower (old Conoco building). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slfunk Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 I should also mention that I would not live in the converted buildings in downtown Houston, either.My original question was from a quality of life perspective, and from the perspective of the investors.Would you gamble $46mil on this?This is hardly a gamble for a couple of reasons. One it is the Gables name, which has proven to provide quality apts and service. Second the occupancy of the rehab of office buildings in downtown Dallas proves to have a very high occupancy level with some of the properties reaching 98 percent with in less then a year of being open. These would include:Davis BuildingInterurban buildingKirbyDallas Power and Light Complex503 Elm Street Condos1501 Elm Condos1900 MainWilson BuildingOn the board:1600 Main (a condo conversion of an office building that is just now starting construction with a sell out of condos in 6 weeks of their first phase)Republic CenterUnion Bank Complex1900 Pacific Ave (debating to go condo or for rent)Third rail lofts on Main StreetThese are just off the top of my head, and with the exception of the Kirby, Wilson, and 503 Elm have come on board in the past 3 yrs. The newer developments are getting larger. There is only one project that I know of that is having trouble leasing and that is 1001 Ross Avenue. A new ground up building near the West End that has some rather "funky" floor plans that are not good for people looking to have roommates. They opened late last fall and were hoping to have 50 percent occupancy by 2005 before starting their second phase. They continued to give incentives (like free parking) and last I heard started dropping rents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 Sounds like a bit of a gamble to me. There is no such thing as a sure-thing. But when the Gables folks looked around the country for skyscrapers switched to rental housing, they came up with just a handful of examples. "There have been only four or five like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Sounds like a bit of a gamble to me. There is no such thing as a sure-thing.Same as with any other project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 Same as with any other project. And the second question remains the same:Would you gamble $46mil on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slfunk Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 And the second question remains the same:Would you gamble $46mil on this?I most certainly would knowing that other projects around downtown are costing more and have seen returns already. Also knowing that I have the city's support in tax incentives for this project. That is part of the 46 mil dollars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 I most certainly would knowing that other projects around downtown are costing more and have seen returns already. Also knowing that I have the city's support in tax incentives for this project. That is part of the 46 mil dollars. Well said!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 So neither of you answered my original question:Would you live there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 In a"New York" Minute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slfunk Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 So neither of you answered my original question:Would you live there?Yes...knowing what these conversions have to offer in way of amentities, leaving my car behind...etc. etc.... These are very nice developments being built for the urban dweller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamtagon Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Would you live there?No, I want a balcony, a big balcony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 No, I want a balcony, a big balcony.Thank you for a voice of reality, tamtagon. The Dallas uber alles bias of the other two posters does not allow them to admit the fact that high rise living without balconies is a miserable existence in ANY city, not just Dallas. The reuse of a historic building is admirable, but you wouldn't find me in it either, if all I can do is open a window for "fresh air".funk and dallasboi, we are not trashing Dallas, but a rather poorly designed redo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmainguy Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Here's my take on office buiding conversions to residential. I just got back fron NYC where we had a great Christmas celebration with my niece in her parent's converted office building. It now has a balcony with a view you could not buy with a billion dollars. [i'll post pics when I get them back] I agree with the others who see an outside area as essential when living in a high rise. This is in no way a slam on Dallas. I know many people who have no problem living in a completely contained environment. Drive down San Felipe to Four-Leaf Towers. The place is maxed out and has-I believe-a penthouse with balconys. There is enough diversity in the market to support both lifestyles. There seems to be a trend to high-rise living and there seems to be a style to fit everyone's wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.