xsatyr Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 How close is this thing to getting built? Pretty damn close; supposedly it's 70% sold and they cleared out the trailer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston? Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Cool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Urbanizer said they are supposed to start at the end of the month i believe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Hey SkylineView, has any activity started happening at the site? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkylineView Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Still a parking lot... no change. I'm assuming work is imminent since they moved the sales office out 2 weeks ago (which was hysterical because it got stuck in the middle of post oak for about 5 minutes). Will report back when the action begins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
por favor gracias Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Thanks for the updates and all the great pics, SkylineView. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SkylineView Posted August 13, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted August 13, 2013 Parking lot removal in progress. 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 yes i saw that they started working on the parking lot this weekend....cant wait to see how this all pans out because that lot does look super small! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uscats35 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Is the lot cement all gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 it looks like it...i live "almost" next door and they seem to have it all knocked out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uscats35 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Great! thanks for the update gene. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkylineView Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 2013 08 17: New parking lot near the old sales center... maybe for the workers? This is directly south of the Bentley dealer. The last pic I will post of everyone's favorite McD's. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisPHous Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Looks like they have relocated sales center to San Felipe or at least have a sign there. Says only 22 units remain. How many were being built? It is at San Felipe west of Post Oak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 My lord that's a small parcel of land for this thing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobruss Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I'm sorry, but I don't understand all of the excitement about a project being developed by Randall Davis, who has proven over and over that he has no taste and will do whatever he can to make the Galleria area look bad.He's already put up one very unattractive building on Post Oak that really detracts from the cluster of interfin buildings by Borlenghi.His projects on West Gray and Shepherd at Dallas are disgusting. At least most of his projects have been relatively low rise buildings but now that he is starting to throw up these kitschy towers I say we revoke his developers license, and make him pay a fine for polluting our skyline.Really, if any of you can defend his work I want to hear it, so I will know who not to consider a reliable source, and someone who has no aesthetic values.I don't get excited by ugly infill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 The only thing bad about the cosmopolitan is the garage and other two you mentioned I actually like. Maybe I have horrible taste but I don't know why everyone hates on those so much.This new project looks petty good and the Titan would have been a nice project, too. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobruss Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 The only thing bad about the cosmopolitan is the garage and other two you mentioned I actually like. Maybe I have horrible taste but I don't know why everyone hates on those so much.This new project looks petty good and the Titan would have been a nice project, too. Okay Lockmatt, everyone has a right to their own taste, but for me Randall Davis has only done one project in Houston that I approve or rather am not totally offended by and that is the Rice Lofts makeover, mainly because he had nothing to do with the exterior of the building. I give him credit for starting the ball in the historic downtown area with this project but everything else he has done is pure garbage.I'm sorry but his style or lack of aesthetics is disturbing. It comes across as very cheap and will not stand the test of time. Unfortunately we are now in a phase of Houston's development that is pretty much void of great design and everything that is being done is on the cheap and purely profit driven with no one out there with the balls to do great architecture.All the new growth is in the energy, and quite frankly I haven't seen a nice tower built for an energy related company in town since Pennzoil, and Gerald Hines was still calling the shots. They are about profit and not design. Sure the BG tower is nice but it still doesn't hold a candle to Pennzoil. I don't think his son or others at Hines have the interest in doing for Houston what Gerald did.Besides they're too busy overseas and on the West Coast to do great work here like they used to be known for. The renderings for the new tower they are talking about sure doesn't send chills up my spine. I hope I'm wrong about Hines, but I know I'm dead right about Davis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 The thing I like about RD is that he puts detail into his work. I don't know architecture technically - what is it about his projects that are "cheap?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fernz Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 The thing I like about RD is that he puts detail into his work. I don't know architecture technically - what is it about his projects that are "cheap?" everything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 everythingCan you name a few specific things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Giant Grecian Statues. Need I say more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobruss Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 First off Lockmatt, I hope what I'm saying you don't take too personally.I just think a lot of his problem is in the detailing. I think, and its only my opinion,that its schlocky, and overdone and just flat out in bad taste.Now if you want to see nice detailing on a new building go look at what was the new Enron building or 1500 Louisianadesigned by Cesar Pelli. Very simple but aesthetically pleasing. No garish colors, just clean light design.Whereas the Davis tower on Post Oak is a terrible color, and he's trying to out deco, deco with his hmmm post modern design.Unfortunately it sticks out like a sore thumb. Just like in art when something in a painting sticks out it shouldn't.His work always sticks out and it shouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Green Greek Domes in Galveston...because Galveston is near the water. You know. Like Greece. Okay. I said more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fernz Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Can you name a few specific things?His taste. Look at....any building he's done. And you can't blame the architects. He keeps changing architect from building to building; he's the common denominator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowerSpotter Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 For one I appreciate Randall Davis classic work in Houston. I think it makes Houston have a mix of France and New York City. I love the diversity of buildings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Brownstones across from our Water Wall. How nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobruss Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I think Randall should stick to doing his work down on Padre Island.Maybe mother nature will resolve the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Roman Numerals and French Gargoyles. On the same building. Why not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobruss Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I know its exciting to see all of the infill and watch the cranes go higher and higher, but if its just going to end up being an ugly building I don't want it cluttering what so far has been a pretty evenly designed skyline. One last thing Mattlock, and then I'm going to leave this for you others to resolve.There is a very well known quote that says it all. "Less is More" Mies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayouCityMan Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I'm not a big fan of RD's work either. I agree that stylistically it is a hodgepodge that will stand out for all the wrong reasons over time. We really have been on the architectural short end of the stick lately (2929 Weslayan, the 40+ story Hines tower, and the twisting museum district tower notwithstanding). I would like to see RD stick with one theme and run with it, only not so gaudy or "out there". Just my 2 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I agree with what you guys are saying, but I think this building will look nice. The Titan would of been better though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Huge posters off "art"* at the top of Post Oak. Elegant. *Don't know what the posters are of. I look away and pretend they're not there. Huge posters off "art"* at the top of Post Oak. Elegant. *Don't know what the posters are of. I look away and pretend they're not there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowerSpotter Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 All I see hear is too much complaining Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Huge posters off "art"* at the top of Post Oak.Elegant.*Don't know what the posters are of. I look away and pretend they're not there.Huge posters off "art"* at the top of Post Oak.Elegant.*Don't know what the posters are of. I look away and pretend they're not there.Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howard Huge Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Huh?Really big "Art" banners hanging on the side of a building? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howard Huge Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 A developer could build a hundred "The Mercers" and I'd rejoice at all the density and infill. Im just happy SOMETHING is going up.Even NYC and Chicago have ugly buildings. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Really big "Art" banners hanging on the side of a building? I got the "art" banners part, just couldn't understand the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howard Huge Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I got the "art" banners part, just couldn't understand the rest.Honestly I didnt get any of it, Im just guessing lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowerSpotter Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 A developer could build a hundred "The Mercers" and I'd rejoice at all the density and infill. Im just happy SOMETHING is going up.Even NYC and Chicago have ugly buildings. Even Dubai too, Developers aren't always perfect. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatesdisastr Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 As long as The Astoria is built the way the rendering portrays it to be, then I don't really see why anyone should be complaining regardless of who is behind it. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArchFan Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 (edited) I thought the "huge posters of art" referred to what someone once referred to as "urinals of the gods" on the Post Oak side of the Cosmo. I.e., what we got instead of the water feature RD teased us with in the earlier promotional material. Um, to explain: those of us who were watching the final phase of construction, expecting that what we were watching was construction of the water feature, were surprised by what happened. It started out looking like pedestal-style bathroom fixtures, after which they added the fake mosaic art posters above them. Edited August 18, 2013 by ArchFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Thank you, ArchFan. Yes. Those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Is their sales center in Roche Bobois? Or are they just advertising? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 (edited) 1st) those huge posters of art can easily be changed one day for something else...2nd) the only thing RD could do better would be if he had those changing color lights shining up on his buildings...nothing says class like changing color lights!!! Edited August 19, 2013 by gene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 ps...sorry this is slightly off topic but it seems all the galleria area streets now have the cool sidewalks/lighting yet Post Oak Blvd does not...is this because they are working on the widening of the street for the metro bus project? the cool lights: http://www.hessamerica.com/Newsletters/201002/andthe bus/road project: http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Uptown-transit-plan-back-on-the-road-4585111.php anyone have any word that we will get these lights along Post Oak Blvd eventually? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonBoy Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 I like it! It make the area look clean and modern! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobruss Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 A developer could build a hundred "The Mercers" and I'd rejoice at all the density and infill. Im just happy SOMETHING is going up.Even NYC and Chicago have ugly buildings.I thought this was an architecture forum. Maybe I was confused when I started following. It sounds more like a construction developer site. I realize work was slow and it helps the economy butI can't believe the quantity over quality argument espoused all over this site. I would rather see less built but better thoughtful design for urban spaces. I think it's more important to create well conceived projects that address urban issues, and think more about how all these millions of new residents are going to get from home to work inside the loop once all of this infill that so many of you are craving gets built. I too would love to see Houston become a truly urban metropolitan area, but I would like to see a little restraint on the part of the developers to just put up anything they want. And why should we be excited with ugly, especially in quantity. Once it's built there's nothing you can do to hide it. On the other hand you can go to another project and find people up in arms about marvy's new fiesta site project, and how poorly it fits in with the neighborhood. Obviously there is a lot of inconsistency in the thinking on individual projects.There seems to be a consistent thread that no matter what it looks like just so long as it gets it gets built.I for one think that this is a terrible stance and if that'is what you want what happens to aesthetics, and smart design? A developer could build a hundred "The Mercers" and I'd rejoice at all the density and infill. Im just happy SOMETHING is going up.Even NYC and Chicago have ugly buildings.I thought this was an architecture forum. Maybe I was confused when I started following. It sounds more like a construction developer site. I realize work was slow and it helps the economy butI can't believe the quantity over quality argument espoused all over this site. I would rather see less built but better thoughtful design for urban spaces. I think it's more important to create well conceived projects that address urban issues, and think more about how all these millions of new residents are going to get from home to work inside the loop once all of this infill that so many of you are craving gets built. I too would love to see Houston become a truly urban metropolitan area, but I would like to see a little restraint on the part of the developers to just put up anything they want. And why should we be excited with ugly, especially in quantity. Once it's built there's nothing you can do to hide it. On the other hand you can go to another project and find people up in arms about marvy's new fiesta site project, and how poorly it fits in with the neighborhood. Obviously there is a lot of inconsistency in the thinking on individual projects.There seems to be a consistent thread that no matter what it looks like just so long as it gets it gets built.I for one think that this is a terrible stance and if that'is what you want what happens to aesthetics, and smart design? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 I think this is a quality design, for what it is... I don't expect a Randall Davis project to hire a Starchitect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 I belive the conversation about quality vs quantity is an excellent topic point. Perhaps it warrents a new forum topic, but Any Randall Davis building (yet built) will surely evoke just this type of debate. And, if the topic were just QvsQ then RD would get dragged into it right quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
por favor gracias Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 (edited) "Your" is spelled "you're" when you are using it as a contraction of "you are".Periods are supposed to be placed inside quotation marks. I don't like a lot of RD projects, but I really like this building if it looks anything like the renderings. Edited August 21, 2013 by por favor gracias 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now