Jump to content

10 And Heights: Mixed-Use At 1515 Studemont St.


Triton

Recommended Posts

  • The title was changed to 1515 Studemont | Party Boy
43 minutes ago, rubberbandman said:

Sounds expensive. HCAD has this property appraised at 2,721,116 (land - 2,268,072 , improvement - 453,044). I understand the potential development opportunity on 1.53 acres next to I10, but how could institutional investors justify a $10.5m price tag for this?

 

He owns property all over Houston. He was the same person to sell his land off of N Main to White Oak Music Hall for quite a hefty price, so I think he understands the market pretty well. I would not be surprised if he got somewhere around this price for it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to 1515 Studemont Party Boy
  • 1 year later...

"The longstanding warehouse Party Boy at 1515 Studemont St. was a go-to for many locals to buy their party supplies. Soon it will be replaced by a mixed-use development that will bring the Heights more store outposts, dentists offices, restaurants and more.

Owned by Oxberry Group, the development will be called 10 and Heights, and is in the beginning stages of development."

Full article here: https://www.theleadernews.com/real_estate/two-new-developments-coming-to-heights/article_7ff28270-05f2-11ec-8fbc-dfcf7cd221a1.html

Leasing Flyer and Renderings: https://www.crexi.com/lease/widgets/238/properties/336541/texas-1st-floor-suites

Pictures of Retail, Office space located at 1515 Studemont St, Houston, TX 77007 for lease - image #2

Pictures of Retail, Office space located at 1515 Studemont St, Houston, TX 77007 for lease - image #1

Edited by swishafisha
tags
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to 10 And Heights: Mixed-Use At 1515 Studemont St.

If METRO decides to build the Studemont Inner-Katy BRT station, it would be super close to this project. It would be like a 250ftish walk? I think there's a low chance that they build it here, but it could definitely happen. I'm sure the developers would like that.

ncs9pfT.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, swishafisha said:

"The longstanding warehouse Party Boy at 1515 Studemont St. was a go-to for many locals to buy their party supplies. Soon it will be replaced by a mixed-use development that will bring the Heights more store outposts, dentists offices, restaurants and more.

Owned by Oxberry Group, the development will be called 10 and Heights, and is in the beginning stages of development."

Full article here: https://www.theleadernews.com/real_estate/two-new-developments-coming-to-heights/article_7ff28270-05f2-11ec-8fbc-dfcf7cd221a1.html

Leasing Flyer and Renderings: https://www.crexi.com/lease/widgets/238/properties/336541/texas-1st-floor-suites

Pictures of Retail, Office space located at 1515 Studemont St, Houston, TX 77007 for lease - image #2

Pictures of Retail, Office space located at 1515 Studemont St, Houston, TX 77007 for lease - image #1

I'm so tired of looking at parking lots. At least front the street.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wilcal said:

If METRO decides to build the Studemont Inner-Katy BRT station, it would be super close to this project. It would be like a 250ftish walk? I think there's a low chance that they build it here, but it could definitely happen. I'm sure the developers would like that.

 

 

This is the kind of transit project that looks great from the standpoint of number of dwelling units or square feet of retail within 1000 ft, but the actual pedestrian experience would be terrible.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said:

How are these developers so clueless? Not saying they need to build a parking garage, but putting parking in the back helps so much. I wish I could afford this chunk of land. I‘d do HAIF proud 😅

I feel like your $10+ million would be better spent elsewhere. This area is pretty soulless. The only thing going for it is the bayou trail. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I emailed them asking why parking wasn't placed in the back. This just seems like such a waste of time and money for an area of town that seems to not really know what direction it's going. You have some semi dense apartment complexes next to a suburban Kroger and future Home Depot that will sit next to a future car wash. And the pedestrian infrastructure is lacking along this corridor.

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2021 at 10:13 PM, j_cuevas713 said:

How are these developers so clueless? Not saying they need to build a parking garage, but putting parking in the back helps so much. I wish I could afford this chunk of land. I‘d do HAIF proud 😅

I don't get the love for back of the structure parking lots. I personally hate parking in the back, and just don't go to places that are built that way. It's also hard on the establishment, since they have to have two entryways, one in front, one in the back.  But, I'm a semi-old fart.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ross said:

I don't get the love for back of the structure parking lots. I personally hate parking in the back, and just don't go to places that are built that way. It's also hard on the establishment, since they have to have two entryways, one in front, one in the back.  But, I'm a semi-old fart.

It is because they aren't designed primarily for cars. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wilcal said:

It is because they aren't designed primarily for cars. 

How many people live within walking distance of that location? How many of them are likely to go there?

It's the developer's money, and they can do what they want, but I just don't see the point in rear parking. It's not like it's a hardship to walk 60 feet across a front parking lot. Again, that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ross said:

How many people live within walking distance of that location? How many of them are likely to go there?

It's the developer's money, and they can do what they want, but I just don't see the point in rear parking. It's not like it's a hardship to walk 60 feet across a front parking lot. Again, that's just me.

Some would say driving 60 feet across a property is even easier than walking 60 feet across a parking lot. 

As I mentioned above, there will likely be a BRT station built in an adjacent parcel. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/18/2021 at 8:43 PM, Ross said:

How many people live within walking distance of that location? How many of them are likely to go there?

It's the developer's money, and they can do what they want, but I just don't see the point in rear parking. It's not like it's a hardship to walk 60 feet across a front parking lot. Again, that's just me.

It’s a hardship for those with disabilities though. It’s even tougher during Summer months when those extra few steps seem like an eternity. That extra 60 ft is enough to deter business as well. If I’m a business, I’m trying to attract all types of clientele, not just motorists. Otherwise I’m losing potential income as a business owner because I’m only catering to one type of commuter. Parking in the back doesn’t create this massive inconvenience for property owners and aesthetically it’s just nicer. A great example is the shopping center on W Gray and Montrose. And to also ask how many people live in proximity is an even bigger reason we need to build smarter. Just because the current layout doesn’t cater to pedestrians doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be built to handle pedestrians. Especially when Metro is planning a station in this location. 

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

The site plan for 10 and Heights, located at  at 1515 Studewood St, was updated yesterday.


In addition to Wild Forks, other tenants include:

  • Palazio Nail Salon (1515 Studewood St, Suite 107)
  • Thaicoon - a local contemporary Thai restaurant (1515 Studewood St, Suite 109)
  • Yummy Seafood - local Vietnamese restaurant (1515 Studewood St, Suite 110)



https://www.crexi.com/lease/properties/336541/texas-1st-floor-suites

https://api-lease.crexi.com/assets/336541/flyer


D9fMyj9.jpg

Edited by IntheKnowHouston
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
On 10/17/2022 at 3:34 PM, steve1363 said:

I feel for you…maybe with greenery the parking lot can be disguised from the freeway?

On the other hand my beloved DaCapo’s is being turned into a dog bakery!  I’m so upset about that.

I love your optimism that the developer will actually invest in greenery. I have a feeling its gonna be a few sad builder grade bald cypress saplings that may or may not take hold...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 9/9/2022 at 6:07 AM, IntheKnowHouston said:

The site plan for 10 and Heights, located at  at 1515 Studewood St, was updated yesterday.


In addition to Wild Forks, other tenants include:

  • Palazio Nail Salon (1515 Studewood St, Suite 107)
  • Thaicoon - a local contemporary Thai restaurant (1515 Studewood St, Suite 109)
  • Yummy Seafood - local Vietnamese restaurant (1515 Studewood St, Suite 110)

 




Community Impact has more on Yummy Seafood's expansion to the 10 and Heights development at 1515 Studewood St. The estimated opening timeline is fall 2023.


From last week's article:

"Officials with Yummy Seafood & Oyster Bar in Katy Asian Town said they have signed a lease to bring a new location to a development coming to 1515 Studemont St., Houston, just south of the Katy Freeway, where Party Boy was formerly located."


https://communityimpact.com/houston/heights-river-oaks-montrose/dining/2022/10/25/yummy-seafood-in-katys-asian-town-signs-on-for-new-studemont-street-restaurant/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
On 9/20/2022 at 11:40 AM, j_cuevas713 said:

God I hate this with all my heart

I can’t believe that they have parking both on the side of Studewood and facing the trail!! Such disregard. This development could have easily been integrated right onto the trail with some walk up stairs or switchbacks

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmanume said:

I can’t believe that they have parking both on the side of Studewood and facing the trail!! Such disregard. This development could have easily been integrated right onto the trail with some walk up stairs or switchbacks

Exactly! So many developers in this city either don't care or are completely out of touch with what people want today. And to think that a Metro BRT stop will be right next to this!? Idiots

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said:

Exactly! So many developers in this city either don't care or are completely out of touch with what people want today. And to think that a Metro BRT stop will be right next to this!? Idiots

I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of people in Houston don't really care where the parking is, just that there is parking. If they can see that there are spaces, they are more likely to visit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yall remind me of this from steve jobs:

“Some people say, "Give the customers what they want." But that's not my approach. Our job is to figure out what they're going to want before they do. I think Henry Ford once said, "If I'd asked customers what they wanted, they would have told me, 'A faster horse!'" People don't know what they want until you show it to them. That's why I never rely on market research. Our task is to read things that are not yet on the page."

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ross said:

I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of people in Houston don't really care where the parking is, just that there is parking. If they can see that there are spaces, they are more likely to visit.

And that's the problem with how developers approach design. While there are parking minimums in this part of town, the design layout is lazy and lacks any level of creativity. You can maximize the space by properly placing parking while at the same time addressing pedestrian needs. A trail connection should have been a given right off the bat. There will also be a BRT station here, yet no thought was put in to how this development will interact with that. I guarantee you it's going to deter potential customers solely based on the idea that we as humans take the path of least resistance.

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, j_cuevas713 said:

And that's the problem with how developers approach design. While there are parking minimums in this part of town, the design layout is lazy and lacks any level of creativity. You can maximize the space by properly placing parking while at the same time addressing pedestrian needs. A trail connection should have been a given right off the bat. There will also be a BRT station here, yet no thought was put in to how this development will interact with that. I guarantee you it's going to deter potential customers solely based on the idea that we as humans take the path of least resistance.

Contact the developer and tell them what you've told us here. Maybe they don't know about the BRT, it's not mentioned in the leasing brochure. This is a 2 story building with office space(or whatever) on the top. It's a weird shaped piece of land that needs to have space for parking for customers and tenants, and a reasonable way for the dumpsters to be emptied.

Where would you put the building? Where would you put the dumpsters and service areas? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"P.J. Jamea, a partner at Oxberry Group, said that the wrought-iron fence was technically on the developers' property and that the contractors, believing it to be a remnant from the former Party Boy store that occupied the site until 2020, had torn it down without consulting anyone. He said that he has spoken with the Descendants of Olivewood and would re-erect the wrought-iron fence once the retaining wall is completed."

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/olivewood-cemetery-dispute-17624957.php#photo-23240549


kGqKVsv.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuse the roughness of this layout, I did it in like 5 mins, but the idea is there. It would have been nice for the developer to have put some thought in to the placement of the main building, but when cars are the only thing on a developers mind, then placing a building in a sea of parking makes sense. First I think dividing the main building in to 3 smaller structures would have laid out nicer than just one giant building. The smallest structure could front the street and the two larger ones could front the bayou, with all 3 buildings connected by a small plaza on the corner with connections to the trail and a possible future connection to the BRT station. That way parking is consolidated in the corner and surrounded by the building with one main entrance/exit on to Studemont. The plaza area could be simple with a couple of benches and trash cans. It doesn't have to be grand or expensive for the developers sake. All in all you would create a much more inviting/accessible place and not just this thing sitting next to the freeway. 

Studemont Building Site Plan.png

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...