Jump to content

Houston Planning on Walkable Places


Recommended Posts

  • 9 months later...
  • 1 month later...
On 3/9/2018 at 6:28 PM, BeerNut said:

Looks like they want to enlarge parking exempt area.

 

March meeting

parking.PNG

So are they wanting to expand it throughout Midtown? That doesn't seem like a big change at all. I would exempt all neighborhoods in the Loop. Either way this is pretty interesting because this is literally the tipping point change cities make when they are progressing to a new level of urbanism. There seems to be a more cohesive plan to future development. 

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Midtown's a solid first step, I wonder if there's just an assumption that it will result in the least political backlash.

 

The other obvious option to me is to tie it to the transit corridors, though that would leave out areas that could benefit, like much of Montrose and the Washington corridor. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On 9/29/2018 at 10:09 PM, EllenOlenska said:

I'm wondering why they don't extend it farther north to where the highway will be, and not where it is currently. Or am I somehow misreading the map?

 

Red is existing, not new. The measures were taken specifically to impact Midtown and EaDo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the reply to the email I received...

 

xxxxx,

Thank you for your comments, I will be presenting the market based parking area to the Planning Commission for their consideration on October 11th, 900 Bagby, 2:30PM. hope to see you there.

 

*For an expedited review for Planning and Development, please send an email request between 12-3pm to PD.expeditedreview@houstontx.gov 

Hector Rodriguez Administration Manager

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2018 at 7:58 AM, BeerNut said:

This is the reply to the email I received...

 

xxxxx,

Thank you for your comments, I will be presenting the market based parking area to the Planning Commission for their consideration on October 11th, 900 Bagby, 2:30PM. hope to see you there.

 

*For an expedited review for Planning and Development, please send an email request between 12-3pm to PD.expeditedreview@houstontx.gov 

Hector Rodriguez Administration Manager

Def keeping my attention all day. Are things like this ever streamed online?

Edited by j_cuevas713
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I couldn't figure out where to place this but this is great of the COH. I've expressed many times how the Spring St. Taylor crossing is dangerous to pedestrians. I've also submitted countless complaints on 311. Good to see them getting the important data to make these intersections safer for pedestrians. 

 

“We need to re-address our design standards and start thinking at a policy level,” she said. “We have to think about the support that we’re providing for people and not blame people for incidents that are happening to them.” 

 

http://swamplot.com/transportation-buffs-are-staking-out-houstons-most-dangerous-intersections-to-better-understand-whats-wrong-with-them/2019-01-31/

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said:

I couldn't figure out where to place this but this is great of the COH. I've expressed many times how the Spring St. Taylor crossing is dangerous to pedestrians. I've also submitted countless complaints on 311. Good to see them getting the important data to make these intersections safer for pedestrians. 

 

“We need to re-address our design standards and start thinking at a policy level,” she said. “We have to think about the support that we’re providing for people and not blame people for incidents that are happening to them.” 

 

http://swamplot.com/transportation-buffs-are-staking-out-houstons-most-dangerous-intersections-to-better-understand-whats-wrong-with-them/2019-01-31/

 

Completely agree. That crossing needs to be completely re-done. Very difficult to cross...and Houston Ave is another one too. I've witnessed two wrecks myself there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
15 minutes ago, cspwal said:

There's parking minimums in east downtown?

 

For now. They are trying to extend the no parking minimum district from downtown into east downtown and further south into Midtown, but it  hasn't happened yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wilcal said:

 

For now. They are trying to extend the no parking minimum district from downtown into east downtown and further south into Midtown, but it  hasn't happened yet. 

 

There are no parking minimums in the portion of EADO south of Texas Ave and west of Emancipation Ave. Under the city parking ordinance, that is defined as part of the Central Business District.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Houston19514 said:

 

There are no parking minimums in the portion of EADO south of Texas Ave and west of Emancipation Ave. Under the city parking ordinance, that is defined as part of the Central Business District.

 

That is totally right. I forgot that it does stick several blocks into East Downtown!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/1/2019 at 10:15 AM, Texasota said:

 

These are great improvements over the current code, especially mandatory compliance near transit stops and more stringent site planning standards. However, if I'm reading slide 21 correctly, development in Walkable Place zones will still have to meet 100% of the city's minimum parking requirements. That's disappointing—excessive parking is probably the biggest issue on corridors like Lower Westheimer, but at least with this new ordinance future lots will be placed behind buildings. Requiring additional bike parking doesn't offset the impact of surface parking lots on walkability. I wish the committee would have been a bit bolder here; if we want these Walkable Places to represent something other than the Houston status quo, parking needs to be completely optional.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, lithiumaneurysm said:

 

These are great improvements over the current code, especially mandatory compliance near transit stops and more stringent site planning standards. However, if I'm reading slide 21 correctly, development in Walkable Place zones will still have to meet 100% of the city's minimum parking requirements. That's disappointing—excessive parking is probably the biggest issue on corridors like Lower Westheimer, but at least with this new ordinance future lots will be placed behind buildings. Requiring additional bike parking doesn't offset the impact of surface parking lots on walkability. I wish the committee would have been a bit bolder here; if we want these Walkable Places to represent something other than the Houston status quo, parking needs to be completely optional.

 

But see, Slide #49 (I think), "Off-Street Parking Standards".  It seems to provide for reduced (and eliminated) parking requirements at least for some streets (TOD Streets and Primary TOD Streets)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Houston19514 said:

 

But see, Slide #49 (I think), "Off-Street Parking Standards".  It seems to provide for reduced (and eliminated) parking requirements at least for some streets (TOD Streets and Primary TOD Streets)

 

True, which is good. But TOD Streets are a much more limited classification than Walkable Places, which can be created anywhere if property owners support it. TOD Streets are, of course, limited to where fixed transit exists, which doesn't cover much of the city. Better than nothing, though.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, lithiumaneurysm said:

 

True, which is good. But TOD Streets are a much more limited classification than Walkable Places, which can be created anywhere if property owners support it. TOD Streets are, of course, limited to where fixed transit exists, which doesn't cover much of the city. Better than nothing, though.

 

So if 19th Street in the Heights were made a Walkable Place, new development would have to have building facades along the street, but would still have to meet minimum parking requirements behind the buildings. That's frustrating.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
30 minutes ago, Texasota said:

Woo! Except not all of Midtown, correct? Not east of San Jac for some reason?

Yeah which makes sense because most of that is residential anyways. Still this is great because originally it was only a small section of EaDo, now its all of the East End. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...