andre154 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 City Council is set to vote this week to declare the Houston Heights Waterworks Reservoir site as surplus property, and to have it appraised. http://t.co/DsQhvwFHV6 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tanith27 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 I would love for this to be a park or shared greenspace. But that won't happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Tract 1 should be street-facing retail. (Or Chase should move onto Tract 1 so their current site can be developed into mixed use w/ GFR.) It would help bridge the no-mans-land on 19th between Ashland and what is set to become a very lively cluster of restaurants at Shepherd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) This has apparently been sold, pending City Council approval, to an as-yet-unnamed buyer. Not clear from the article if the sale includes the second tract between 20th and 21st streets. Edited November 7, 2016 by Angostura Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamHouston Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 I heard that it's going to be a giant Bucee's once Prop One passes. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Whatever goes in there, part of the green space is almost certain to become a parking lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andre154 Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) Alliance Residential is set to acquire the sites. A public meeting will be held on November 29th to discuss their plans. Edited November 18, 2016 by andre154 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Multi-family complex with possible retail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EllenOlenska Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Tract 1 (Which I've puzzled at many times; I like the large dark bricked building.) Tract 2 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 Very interesting that they plan to save the historic structures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 On 11/19/2016 at 9:05 AM, Houston19514 said: Very interesting that they plan to save the historic structures. Don't think they have a choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HNathoo Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 Does anyone know the price they're paying to acquire these sites? It seems as if it would be information available to the public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poyea Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 Please continue the discussion in the existing topic below. http://swamplot.com/apartment-developer-ready-to-buy-landmarked-heights-waterworks-land-wants-to-know-whatcha-think/2016-11-18/ Passing this one along long since it is a huge piece of land and on 19th street (with a second parcel on 20th). Please let it not be another apt complex. Note the public meeting slated for next Tuesday at the 12th St fire station. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s3mh Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 Dear Admin: Please let this thread stay up in the Heights forum and do not merge with the going up thread. There are very few big projects in the Heights and when threads about them get merged into going up, a lot of Heights people miss out on the discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 AFAIK, City Council will have to approve the sale, at which point the amount will be public, if it's not already. Apparently there were 19 bidders and Alliance submitted the highest bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 i love that dark brick building too!!! love that 4th shot and i cannot wait to do a photoshoot in front of it!!! thanks for posting! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAG Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 Wondering how Alliance Residential will balance the landmark status with building a mega-complex. Anyone know what the historical status actually protects/does not protect? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bedmondson Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 I believe it requires notifications and waiting periods before you tear down a city recognized building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 37 minutes ago, bedmondson said: I believe it requires notifications and waiting periods before you tear down a city recognized building. The water works is a protected landmark, which means they can't be demolished without a Certificate of Appropriateness from the HAHC, which is unlikely to be forthcoming. Anything Alliance plans for that site will have to either incorporate or build around the three existing buildings. AFAIK, this only applies to the exterior of the buildings. Alliance can pretty much do what they want with the interiors without needing a CoA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
innerloop Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 I don't know about the other two buildings, but my first thought of the best way to save the water tank is to take the top off and make it the pool. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bedmondson Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 20 hours ago, Angostura said: The water works is a protected landmark, which means they can't be demolished without a Certificate of Appropriateness from the HAHC, which is unlikely to be forthcoming. Anything Alliance plans for that site will have to either incorporate or build around the three existing buildings. AFAIK, this only applies to the exterior of the buildings. Alliance can pretty much do what they want with the interiors without needing a CoA. http://www.chron.com/homes/article/What-does-it-take-to-protect-a-historic-Houston-6075235.php "The 'protected' designation means that the structure cannot be demolished or altered without the approval of the Commission," Hartgrove says. "The landmarks can proceed with an inappropriate alteration or demolition after the Commission denies their application for that activity once 90 days is up." Is this Houston Chronicle article incorrect on this? Edited November 23, 2016 by bedmondson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 The wording in the article is confusing. They're contrasting Protected Landmark status with just Landmark status. Landmarks may be altered or demoed after a 90-day waiting period; Protected Landmarks may not. The Alabama Theater (mentioned in the article) only had Landmark status. The water works has Protected Landmark status. Anyone can apply for a building to be designated a Landmark, but only the property owner can apply for Protected Landmark status, which CoH did as then-owner of the water works site. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Angostura said: The wording in the article is confusing. They're contrasting Protected Landmark status with just Landmark status. Landmarks may be altered or demoed after a 90-day waiting period; Protected Landmarks may not. The Alabama Theater (mentioned in the article) only had Landmark status. The water works has Protected Landmark status. Anyone can apply for a building to be designated a Landmark, but only the property owner can apply for Protected Landmark status, which CoH did as then-owner of the water works site. The city website indicates that the waterworks has just landmark status. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 The City could sell the property with deed restrictions that limit what can be done with the existing buildings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-Town Man Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 I care more about those massive trees on the southeast corner of Tract 2 than those buildings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdm1130 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 13 hours ago, H-Town Man said: I care more about those massive trees on the southeast corner of Tract 2 than those buildings. Same here! I'd love to see tract 2 turned in to a park (although, I know that won't happen). The Heights could use some more parks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 On 11/23/2016 at 1:48 PM, Houston19514 said: The city website indicates that the waterworks has just landmark status. The website is incorrect. Well, partially correct. It has both Landmark and Protected Landmark status. HAHC Report: https://www.houstontx.gov/planning/HistoricPres/landmarks/15PL123_Heights_Water_Works.pdf City Council Minutes: http://houston.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/DisplayAgendaPDF.ashx?MinutesMeetingID=176 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Angostura Posted November 30, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted November 30, 2016 Public meeting on the development tonight. Some very quick details: Tract 2 (NW corner of Nicholson & 20th) will be an 8-story, 275-unit apartment building (80% 1BR, rest 2BR) East half of Tract 1 (SE corner of Nicholson & 20th) will be a 63-unit "boutique" apartment bldg (90% 2BR, rest 3BR) Harres Exezidis (Cottonwood, Lagrange, Liberty Station) is a partner in the development for the restaurant spaces Each of the existing buildings (4000 sf reservoir, 1700 sf and 4000 sf pumping buidlings) will be restaurant spaces, with additional patio space, as well as space for food trucks. Up to 5000 s.f. will be community garden. They want to commission a sculpture made from the salvaged, excavated pipework. Planned construction start, late summer 2017, for 2019 completion. (Harres expressed a hope that the restaurant spaces would open earlier than that.) All of this is preliminary, of course. Deal is not closed, and permits have not been issued. Some photos of the posters at the event are below. 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Could use some tree facing the street but maybe not if the street is to be widened down the line? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmitch94 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Wow very promising. I hope this comes to fruition. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 7 hours ago, jmitch94 said: Wow very promising. I hope this comes to fruition. There was a fair amount of hand-wringing and pearl-clutching at the meeting, as one might imagine. Concerns expressed included: "How will this affect children coming to and going from Helms ES?" (across 21st from the 275-unit building) "It's already hard enough to cross 20th at the bike trail, now it will be impossible" "Where will all the poop go?" "That sure seems like a lot of apartments. Couldn't you build fewer?" "If people park on Nicholson (like they do around the apartments on 23rd & Nicholson) it will be impassible." The irony of wanting ever more walkability but opposing every apartment development is apparently lost on the Heights. Also, the renderings kind of make these building stick out, but they're adjacent to a hospital and across from a medical building of similar height. The value of Alliance's bid won't become public until city council votes to approve the sale, but I'm guessing it's in the low 8-figures. I wonder what will happen when Chase realizes that their drive-thru lanes are sitting on $5M worth of dirt? 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 http://theleadernews.com/initial-plans-for-19th-street-waterworks-site-revealed/ Cyrus Bahrami, who oversees development, investment and construction operations for the Houston office of Alliance, said he previously lived in the Heights and has been looking at the site for some time. Council member Cohen stated that the property would most likely have been multi-residential property regardless, because that’s what the highest bidders were proposing. Bahrami said that the orientation for both would face the commercial areas with entrances facing 20th Street. He also said that in large part the parking for both structures would be underground, with an additional wraparound so that the public won’t see the parking. Exezidis has plans for two to three restaurants on the waterworks site. Because of the dry statute, they would follow the private club route. Since the decommissioned water plant is a City of Houston protected landmark, it cannot be demolished, and Exezidis he plans to keep the structures much the same as they are, particularly on the outside. He told the group of his work on La Grange in Montrose which used to be a horse hospital in the 1920s, and pledges to do something similar with the waterworks site with regard to repurposing elements and keeping as much as possible of the architectural features. “We let the building tell us what the concept is going to be,” he said. In addition to the restaurants Exezidis proposes a 5,000 square foot community garden, with a shed, and irrigation. The space could also host farmers markets and special events. Exezidis is also talking to artists about excavating the old water pipes in the ground and turning them into sculptures. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Another meeting being held this evening. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Anybody attend this meeting? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andre154 Posted December 13, 2016 Author Share Posted December 13, 2016 Saw an article from yesterday that summarized the meeting. Not much to add to the discussion. http://www.houstonchronicle.com/neighborhood/heights/news/article/Heights-residents-grill-city-on-apartment-10791049.php?t=d49561d47e&utm_content=buffer3bc8e&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer&cmpid=twitter-premium 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 (edited) Counting the square footage occupied by buildings they can't knock down, that's over $90/s.f., which is... high. Even so, given the size of the project, I'd guess the dirt is only about 1/4 of the total cost. Chase should approach whoever submitted the 2nd highest bid, and sell them the land their drive-through is on. Edited December 21, 2016 by Angostura Corrected price per s.f. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EllenOlenska Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 There is a lot of work going on around the property. Men are digging up the ground between the road and the Nicholson facing property line, and there are people working on 19th street. The gates to the water work plant open. A lot of energy expended but little else to report. The Chase Bank building has for sale signs up. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 On 3/13/2017 at 4:40 PM, EllenOlenska said: The Chase Bank building has for sale signs up. So... There are for sale signs up for the areas currently occupied by the Chase drive-thru and associated 2-story building (essentially the entire block bounded by 19th, Lawrence, 20th and Nicholson, except for the two properties at 527 and 527 w 19th) as well as the Chase parking lot on the south side of 19th. There is also a for-sale sign up for the former Water Works tract, though NOT for the empty tract at the NW corner of Nicholson and 20th. My guess is that, rather than develop the two catty-corner sites they acquired at auction from CoH, Alliance will develop JUST the empty site, and try to sell the site with the water works buildings to be co-developed with the Chase site. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Just saw the for sale signs myself. This is all so exciting. Hopefully we can slowly connect downtown Heights to all the development along Shepherd. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EllenOlenska Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 It strikes me that this thread may have to proliferate. http://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/real-estate/article/Chase-bank-puts-Heights-land-up-for-sale-11019760.php 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mab Posted June 8, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted June 8, 2017 Quote Braun Enterprises plans to redevelop the historic Heights waterworks, a city-owned property on 19th Street, into a collection of restaurants in the neighborhood near downtown. The Houston-based company is under contract to acquire the site from Alliance Residential in late September, according to Zach Wolf, director of leasing for Braun Enterprises. It will purchase the property, which sits on more than 1.5 acres at the northeast corner of 19th and Nicholson, from the Phoenix-based apartment developer. Alliance Residential is buying two catty-corner lots along Nicholson at West 20th streets from the city of Houston, and will in turn sell the lot with the waterworks buildings to Braun Enterprises. "This is our 25th project in the Heights area," Braun Enterprises president Dan Braun said in an email. "Our intent is to embrace the walkability and help continue to connect Yale to Shepherd along 19th Street," he said, adding that 19th "has always been the bull's-eye in the Heights for retail and by adding four freestanding restaurants, we hope to make this an area for the community to gather in the Heights." Art Deco pumping station from 1939; and a pump building constructed in 1949. A proposed building along 19th Street would add 5,000 square feet to the project, which is being designed by Jared Tipps of Tipps Architecture. A lawn area would be created in the center of the existing buildings, which total almost 12,000 square feet. One of the buildings could be expanded by nearly 1,300 square feet. "We are incorporating a considerable amount of greenery and outdoor space to make it very pedestrian friendly," Wolf said. "The Heights Hike and Bike Trail runs adjacent to the western side of our property and we expect to generate considerable pedestrian traffic off of the trail." Braun Enterprises' area developments have attracted tenants such as Harold's Restaurant, Bar & Terrace and Torchy's Tacos at nearby Harold's in the Heights, Mellow Mushroom at 1919 N. Shepherd and Bernie's Burger Bus at 2200 Yale. The site is directly across from another potential redevelopment site. Earlier this year, JPMorgan Chase Bank put its two-story bank building and land on the market. It is reserving a portion as the site for a new modern building. Just north of that, Alliance Residential plans to develop a Broadstone apartment midrise. Braun Enterprises would begin work as soon as the property purchase is finalized, with completion targeted in the second quarter, according to Wolf, who anticipates plenty of interest from both national and local restaurants. "Nineteenth Street has always been the main street. It's where everyone wants to be," Wolf said. "There just hasn't been any space available." 4 http://www.chron.com/business/real-estate/article/Heights-waterworks-plan-now-includes-retail-11206224.php#item-38488 15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_cuevas713 Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 Not sure if this has a thread already. http://www.chron.com/business/real-estate/article/Heights-waterworks-plan-now-includes-retail-11206224.php?ipid=ntk#photo-13051430 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 This makes a lot of sense. Re-developing the waterworks site was never in Alliance's wheelhouse, and Braun has some credibility and history in re-purposing older structures like this. Probably means two multifamily projects, on the NW and SW corners of Nicholson and 20th; probably >500 units total. What I'd really like to see is a parking structure on the SE corner of the waterworks site, which could serve the Harold's development as well as this one. That would free up one or both of the two parcels of land on 18th dedicated to parking for that development. Renderings seem to show surface parking on the east half of the site, though. Wonder if Braun is getting close to a critical mass of properties along 19th/20th to start looking into a special parking area. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Note dupe topics merged. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EllenOlenska Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Look at all that green space. I'm being facetious. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUCAJUN Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) Why are we always getting these Dallas based restaurants in our new developments like this one? Is it the same the other way around? Edited June 19, 2017 by HOUCAJUN 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 That's a pretty impressive set of tenants so far. It looks like they're meeting their parking requirements fully on-site. Depending on the final square footages and use classifications, with the 40% break for historical buildings (provided they get a CoA), they'll need something between 120 and 130, which is about what's on the site plan. I was hoping for structured parking here, as it would let them re-purpose some of the land used for parking at the Harold's development, but I guess they couldn't make those numbers work. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angostura Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 2 hours ago, CrockpotandGravel said: I was hoping for structured parking too. What's being proposed won't be enough for surface parking. This development will bring in people from all parts of town, and there needs to be structured parking to provide enough room and limit the number of parked cars on the street. Both Nicholson and 20th are no-parking. 19th has a couple dozen street spaces, but probably not enough to absorb demand, especially with the 40% break they'll get for re-developing historic buildings. So some of the people that park on the street will have to do so on 18th and 21st. There are also surface lots for the hospital at 19th & Ashland and 20th & Ashland that could be developed if Braun were to go vertical here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texasota Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 8 hours ago, CrockpotandGravel said: I was hoping for structured parking too. What's being proposed won't be enough for surface parking. This development will bring in people from all parts of town, and there needs to be structured parking to provide enough room and limit the number of parked cars on the street. Why is limiting cars parked on the street a good thing? If there's street parking available than that's exactly what's it's for, and I have to imagine that the vast majority of Heights residents have off-street parking. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
innerloop Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 There's already a four story parking deck across the street for the Heights Medical Tower that I bet doesn't get much use in the evenings and on weekends. Maybe they could arrange something with those guys. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.