Jump to content

Development List For Buildings In Houston


Urbannizer

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
7 hours ago, ArtNsf said:

so, surely Houston won't allow Austin to have the tallest building in Texas for long ?  as a native Houstonian, I find that appalling, although I'm a bit proud of Austin for scoring so well.

Think of it as the booby prize for them losing out to us on pretty much everything else that matters. 😛

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ArtNsf said:

so, surely Houston won't allow Austin to have the tallest building in Texas for long ?  as a native Houstonian, I find that appalling, although I'm a bit proud of Austin for scoring so well.

Austin is able to build due to residential demand.  Do you live downtown?

Most of us cry about the lack of urbanity in Houston while enjoying the patios/backyards in our detached SFH.

I’m more interested in the QOL in Houston.  In terms of amenities no city in Texas rivals Houston.  
Austin can have their weird looking super-tall.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Austin has pressures that Houston doesn’t- land is expensive, cost to develop is expensive, zoning means they can’t just plop down skyscrapers wherever they want. (Though I’m unsure if they wound up passing zoning reform- anyone know?) 

I don’t think detached homes and urbanity are mutually exclusive. I mean, the city I immediately think of is Tokyo. They have a lot of SF detached homes in the city and they’re about as urban as it gets. (Though I don’t think I’ve seen as many 4-story homes as here in Houston. Lots of them have carports though.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tokyo single-family homes are about 1,000sf. With maybe one subcompact car, and extensive and reliable public transit. Hardly comparable to Houston. And only about a third of Tokyo residents live in single-family homes. In Houston, I think single-family homes are about 50% of the total housing stock. The Houston larger 2,000+ sf homes (plus a yard) are generally nice for the owner but the lower density and vast, dividing, and expensive highway system diminishes any real urbanism or cultural energy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Townhouses have done a lot to curb the spiraling property sizes in the city at least. ~2400 sf on a lot not much bigger than the building footprint isn't *small*, but it's at least comparable to older east coast (and UK) rowhouse/terrace house sizing and is 100% compatible with urbanism and transit.

So not Tokyo, but plenty of neighborhoods in Philly or London. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
On 9/9/2023 at 12:49 PM, Bassclef said:

Quite sad, and doesn’t look like it’ll happen anytime soon.

Until there is a turnaround in office leasing, there will probably not be any supertalls anywhere in the country outside of New York or Miami. If Houston were a place where supertall residential or mixed-use highrises were occurring, it would be more likely, but right now the limit seems to be around 600 feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...