Spaceport Houston Developments

[ArtNsf]

wonder if anyone knows of any updates to this project and/or has photos they can post of the construction at Ellington Field (Spaceport Houston) ?  Such an exciting project that needs some light on it in this forum. 

[Avossos]

Flew over it recently. No construction nor air traffic there.

[gene]

My friend sent me a text yesterday saying they just put up a sign on the fence at Ellington saying something about Spaceport. She is going to try to go by there again soon to see what it said exactly. 

[EllenOlenska]

The air traffic control tower is going up there. 

[mattyt36]

There’s really nothing to report.

 

Those renderings were conceptual marketing drawings ... those buildings were never going to be built as such.

 

Its only real chances for success is to attract companies to locate on EFD property, but even that’s a longshot. 

 

Not saying it’s a bad a concept but anyone who interpreted that as something “real” had their head in the stars.

 

HAS was doing things at IAH and HOU ... it was EFD’s turn. Definitely EFD’s best long-term hope but it really is a marketing gambit.

 

The idea that spacecraft need a control tower ...

Edited April 19, 2018 by mattyt36

[EllenOlenska]

I'm not aerospace engineer, but I figure a horizontal takeoff and landing spaceplane really needs a control tower. I'm sorry I'm on this control tower, but it's there and it's big. 

[Mr.Clean19]

I'm sure it is tied in with the testing of supersonic speeds over Galveston. 

[mattyt36]

4 hours ago, Mr.Clean19 said:

I'm sure it is tied in with the testing of supersonic speeds over Galveston. 

 

What is tied in?

[mattyt36]

6 hours ago, EllenOlenska said:

I'm not aerospace engineer, but I figure a horizontal takeoff and landing spaceplane really needs a control tower. I'm sorry I'm on this control tower, but it's there and it's big. 

 

Control towers in general are becoming obsolete.

 

http://www.travelandleisure.com/travel-news/air-traffic-control-towers-removed-from-airports

 

But their advantage is really to monitor ground traffic.  It's not like there will be a lot of spacecraft taking off, landing, and taxiing at any given time.

 

The control tower was more of a vanity project.

[cspwal]

Even with a remote control location, you still need to have an elevated platform for the camera systems.  In the US, it is still in the developmental stages - a demonstration airport is in Leesburg, VA https://www.leesburgva.gov/government/departments/airport/remote-air-traffic-control-tower 

 

Current space launch operations are done by remote - the launch control center at Kennedy Space Center for example has windows facing the launchpads, but everyone inside is actually facing away from the windows

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_Control_Center)

 

For horizontal take-off and landing space ships, I suspect that it will be treated more like aircraft - and for now that means a control tower.

[mattyt36]

7 hours ago, cspwal said:

Even with a remote control location, you still need to have an elevated platform for the camera systems.  In the US, it is still in the developmental stages - a demonstration airport is in Leesburg, VA https://www.leesburgva.gov/government/departments/airport/remote-air-traffic-control-tower 

 

Current space launch operations are done by remote - the launch control center at Kennedy Space Center for example has windows facing the launchpads, but everyone inside is actually facing away from the windows

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_Control_Center)

 

For horizontal take-off and landing space ships, I suspect that it will be treated more like aircraft - and for now that means a control tower.

 

Trust me, the EFD control tower has absolutely nothing to do with the Spaceport. It was spun that way, but I can assure you it doesn’t. 

[cspwal]

Probably a response to the air traffic then. With hobby nearby, a VFR approach seems ill advised

[mattyt36]

7 hours ago, cspwal said:

Probably a response to the air traffic then. With hobby nearby, a VFR approach seems ill advised

 

What does VFR have to do with a control tower?

 

What does VFR have to with proximity to HOU? IFR doesn’t make a difference when it comes to avoiding traffic.

 

If I had to guess 99% of operations at EFD are VFR as it is.

[Luminare]

Some new info about the Space Port this morning on archdaily

 

https://www.archdaily.com/909686/aerial-futures-explores-commercial-space-travel-at-the-houston-spaceport

 

Video:

 

 

[AREJAY]

Do we know what phase 2B consists of?

 

www.cohtora.houstontx.gov/ibi_apps/WFServlet.ibfs?IBIF_webapp=/ibi_apps&IBIC_server=EDASERVE&IBIWF_msgviewer=OFF&IBIAPP_app=soldpermits&IBIF_ex=sold_permit_d&CLICKED_ON=&PN=19057550&PT=13

 

Quote

ELLINGTON SPACE PORT INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE 2B (BSG-2019-27-EFD)

Project No:	19057550
Date :	2019/06/07 00:00:00
USE :	ELLINGTON SPACE PORT INFRASTRUCTURE PHAS
Owner/Occupant :	**
Job Address :	13200 SPACE CENTER BLVD 77059
Valuation :	$ 17,200,000
Permit Type :	13
FCC Group :
Buyer :	*TEXAS STERLING-BANICKI, LLC
Address :	20810 FERNBUSH LN 77073
Phone :	(480) 320-4358

[Timoric]

-

 

 

 

Edited July 12, 2019 by Timoric

[ZRFkris]

[ArtNsf]

Great news !  This will be an exciting project once it gets going in earnest.  Look forward to competing with California for Space Travel ports !!!

[mattyt36]

FYI, phase I is infrastructure + a 50,000 sf building only.

 

From the article:

 

The Houston Airport System will celebrate the groundbreaking of phase 1 — an $18.8 million project — with a ceremony at Ellington Airport at 13150 Space Center Blvd. The scope of the project’s first phase includes streets, water, wastewater, electrical power and distribution, fiber optics and communications facilities, according to a June 26 media advisory from HAS. The first phase will also include the construction of 53,000 square feet of lab and office space, according to the HAS website. Some 154 acres of land are set aside for phase 1.

[Urbannizer]

https://www.constructionequipmentguide.com/phase-one-of-houston-spaceport-under-way/45972

 

 

 

 

 

[Purdueenginerd]

This project (the spaceport in general) doesnt pass my sniff test. There's clearly a future for private ventures into space, but right now the economic of space flights appear to break down into 3 groups. 

 

1.) Governments, Spycraft, Defense, scientific research. 

2.) Telecommunications 

3.) Stupidly Rich Tourists. 

 

To me, Private companies are mostly going after contracts in the 1 and 2 categories. Is there any indications that there's sufficient demand to build a spaceport, much less in Houston?  I dont know... convince me I'm wrong. I'm a Star Trek fan, so I want to like this, but call me a healthy skeptic. 

 

 

[Luminare]

2 hours ago, Toopicky said:

 

Wow, that is hardly "ground breaking" news .... this site work is necessary for just about any type of modern development, and the lab and office space could be used by almost any  company.

 

So is East River building infrastructure not "ground breaking" news? Just because it happens in all projects doesn't mean its not momentous or "ground breaking". All things have humble beginnings and this is just that, the beginning. These things don't just happen over night, and if you were in the industry you would know this. I'm currently working on a project that isn't the greatest of all time, and in fact to many would seem very mundane, but because I've been on it now for a year, and it still is slogging through the design process I'll be relieved when it breaks ground. I can't even imagine the prep work, the bureaucracy, and negotiating it took to even make this happen in the first place. This is a big deal even if its just roads. Where roads are laid is where the people will go. They even say it in the article itself. Just building the infrastructure will be the first step into making this more possible than ever before because of how expensive a barrier to entry laying out infrastructure can be. They aren't thinking about right now. They are thinking about the future, and that is how they will pitch this to everyone. Its just roads now, but think about what the future will hold. Lots of possibilities.

 

14 minutes ago, Purdueenginerd said:

This project (the spaceport in general) doesnt pass my sniff test. There's clearly a future for private ventures into space, but right now the economic of space flights appear to break down into 3 groups. 

 

1.) Governments, Spycraft, Defense, scientific research. 

2.) Telecommunications 

3.) Stupidly Rich Tourists. 

 

To me, Private companies are mostly going after contracts in the 1 and 2 categories. Is there any indications that there's sufficient demand to build a spaceport, much less in Houston?  I dont know... convince me I'm wrong. I'm a Star Trek fan, so I want to like this, but call me a healthy skeptic. 

 

 

 

I'm in the same boat. Not because of this project, but because of where we are at as a country today. People are just to focused on the numerous wicked problems we have in culture, the economy, and in government to really even consider anything beyond. Going to space is something that will have to be a priority in this country again if we really want to go further ahead, and the national consciousness is just nowhere near there. Its why though I like guys like Elon Musk. He doesn't care about any of that. He has a dream and is going to do it no matter what. As long as there is that one person who is that daring then eventually others will take notice. If he can send a Tesla into space just for fun then the possibilities are endless with that guy. Even with that being said the argument of national consciousness is a real thing that can not be ignored. We aren't in the 60's where people were inspired by the moon landings which made everyone want to be astronauts or scientists or engineers. Today everyone wants to be a youtube star, or be famous. Not like they are bad things, but these don't get us closer to the stars, or build a nation to get to that Star Trek dream. Your healthy skepticism is valid, but I wouldn't place it on the development itself, but the trend, and outside forces its trying to go against.

[102IAHexpress]

1 hour ago, Purdueenginerd said:

This project (the spaceport in general) doesnt pass my sniff test. There's clearly a future for private ventures into space, but right now the economic of space flights appear to break down into 3 groups. 

 

1.) Governments, Spycraft, Defense, scientific research. 

2.) Telecommunications 

3.) Stupidly Rich Tourists. 

 

To me, Private companies are mostly going after contracts in the 1 and 2 categories. Is there any indications that there's sufficient demand to build a spaceport, much less in Houston?  I dont know... convince me I'm wrong. I'm a Star Trek fan, so I want to like this, but call me a healthy skeptic. 

 

 

 

You are correct about spaceports in general. Last year Wired had an interesting article about the boom and bust of spaceports in general. https://www.wired.com/story/americas-spaceport-boom-is-outpacing-the-need-to-go-to-space/?CNDID=13660475&mbid=nl_090518_daily_list3_p4

 

Essentially, there is an oversupply of spaceports in the US. And it is correct to question the need for Houston's Spaceport, especially when the airport system could use funds for sooo many other projects. I'm afraid we may have another Bayport Cruise Terminal fiasco on our hands. 

 

At this point, we have the FAA horizonal license, so I am all for utilizing it. However, I'm not sure why we need to spend so much money on capital costs for a port without tenants. IMO, the best play (in Houston) of the three options above is number three. Stupidly rich tourists. You don't need any new construction. Just market Space Center Houston as the "terminal" and have the tourists ride in one those silver Airstreams to the runway at Ellington. It's marketing gold for the city. But of course we will not take advantage of it. We don't need a bunch of tenants at the port. We just need -one- to operate the space tourism flights. 

[bobruss]

After reading your responses in several different posts, I'd have to say that your moniker is very appropriate.

[Luminare]

Just now, bobruss said:

After reading your responses in several different posts, I'd have to say that your moniker is very appropriate.

 

By this persons metric I'm sure this person is the same kind of person who would claim TCR isn't a railroad because they don't have a functioning railroad yet. Its the most faulty logic ever. It essentially is based on the premise that a person can mind-read or know the future before it happens which is impossible. Its like saying I can't be in architecture because I'm not licensed. There is saying that you are doing it. Then putting it into practice (where I'm at). Then certifying or accrediting the result of all the previous. NASA and SpaceX were space organizations before they ever put anything into space. Again, this makes zero sense when you think beyond the present or what you can see in front of you.

[Naviguessor]

2 hours ago, Toopicky said:

Why call a Ellington a "Spaceport" when there are no flights into/out of  space from it? In fact, there are not even any facilities there, but only a few nifty PowerPoint shows and a few pieces of paper ..... that is called "Hopeium" in my vernacular.  Call Ellington what it is, an airport, until they actually get a contract for space travel.

 

Maybe it's because Ellington IS a Licensed Spaceport. 

 

https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=19074

 

QTE from FAA Site:

Spaceports

• The FAA licenses commercial launch and reentry sites in the United States. The following are FAA currently licensed launch sites:
  – California Spaceport, CA
  – Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL
  – Cape Canaveral Spaceport/Shuttle Landing Facility, FL
  – Cecil Field, FL
  – Colorado Air & Space Port, CO
  – Ellington Airport, TX
  – Midland International Airport, TX
  – Mojave Air and Space Port, CA
  – Oklahoma Air and Space Ports, OK
  – Pacific Spaceport Complex Alaska, AK
  – Spaceport America, NM
  – Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport, VA

 

 

Edited September 24, 2019 by Naviguessor

[Luminare]

10 minutes ago, Toopicky said:

 

"Never assume, because when you assume you make an ASS out of U and ME" quote from Jerry Belson

 

One assumes when evidence is not presented. One infers when evidence is presented. I can infer through the statements which you have presented and through logical reasoning that this is a likely thing which you might do along with evidence of others who have done so in the past. Therefore I do not have to assume anything and therefore this statement isn't valid to this current context.

...Oh and also simply quoting someone isn't an argument, or know what it means.

 

I can probably teach a parrot to recite this quote, but that doesn't mean it understands what its saying.

[mattyt36]

3 hours ago, Toopicky said:

 

Why call a Ellington a "Spaceport" when there are no flights into/out of  space from it? In fact, there are not even any facilities there, but only a few nifty PowerPoint shows and a few pieces of paper ..... that is called "Hopeium" in my vernacular.  Call Ellington what it is, an airport, until they actually get a contract for space travel.

 

The City has (and is annually maintaining) a spaceport operating license from the federal government.

 

That said, there is no "Ellington Spaceport," there is a "Houston Spaceport," which is a really a real estate development, at "Ellington Airport."

4 hours ago, CrockpotandGravel said:

More on Spaceport Houston from Houston Chronicle yesterday:

 

The Houston Spaceport has inked a deal with pilot training company FlightSafety International, the third tenant of what the Houston Airport System hopes will become a cluster of aerospace companies.
 

Houston City Council approved a 30-year lease, with the option for two additional five-year periods, for an aeronautical training facility at the Houston Spaceport at Ellington Airport. New York-based FlightSafety International is seeking to relocate and expand its current operations near Hobby Airport.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/bizfeed/article/Houston-Spaceport-inks-deal-with-its-third-tenant-14461004.php

 

Spin for poaching from existing tenants (at HOU) and adding a company with no existing ties to the space industry.

[Luminare]

Went to check out the progress on the Spaceport. Still lots of civil work going on. Safe to say that we won't need to visit this site for a little while longer, maybe another 6 months or so. Hopefully by then they'll get some of the roads done.

 

 

 

[Ross]

On 9/24/2019 at 11:21 AM, Naviguessor said:

 

Maybe it's because Ellington IS a Licensed Spaceport. 

 

https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=19074

 

QTE from FAA Site:

Spaceports

• The FAA licenses commercial launch and reentry sites in the United States. The following are FAA currently licensed launch sites:
  – California Spaceport, CA
  – Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL
  – Cape Canaveral Spaceport/Shuttle Landing Facility, FL
  – Cecil Field, FL
  – Colorado Air & Space Port, CO
  – Ellington Airport, TX
  – Midland International Airport, TX
  – Mojave Air and Space Port, CA
  – Oklahoma Air and Space Ports, OK
  – Pacific Spaceport Complex Alaska, AK
  – Spaceport America, NM
  – Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport, VA

 

 

The Oklahoma site is near the great town of Burns Flat, Oklahoma. A thriving metropolis of about 2,000 people. The only real attraction there is the Clinton Sherman Airpark, which has a 13,503 foot runway, built by the USAF decades ago. It was an alternate landing site for the Space shuttle. A friend's parents were from there, and I was shocked when I looked at it on a map, and saw how small the town is.

[Urbannizer]

https://communityimpact.com/houston/bay-area/development/2020/02/26/houston-city-council-grants-spaceport-development-extra-375-million/

 

Due to an unforeseen electrical power distribution cost and the need for the creation of a sign, an extra $3.75 million will fund the development of the Houston Spaceport after Houston City Council’s vote Feb. 26.

 

According to a memo from the city, changes in the power distribution route and added transformer work created unexpected additional costs to supply the spaceport, which is still under development, with its planned 10 megawatts of power. As a result, the energy budget for the project had to increase by $2.8 million.

Additionally, about $934,000 is needed to create and install a Houston Space monument sign, similar to the ones at the George Bush Intercontinental, William Hobby and Ellington airports, according to the memo.

Finally, about $16,000 will go toward Houston’s Civic Art Program. Since 1999, 1.75% of the budget for city-funded construction projects has gone toward projects to integrate artwork in Houston’s public spaces.

[Purdueenginerd]

Quote

Additionally, about $934,000 is needed to create and install a Houston Space monument sign, similar to the ones at the George Bush Intercontinental, William Hobby and Ellington airports, according to the memo.

 

😕

[texas911]

$934K for signs? There's gotta be something going on there.

[Montrose1100]

16 hours ago, texas911 said:

$934K for signs? There's gotta be something going on there.

Have you seen the IAH and HOU signs? Giant sculptures with LED lights and some with screens. Not to mention the landscaping.

[Luminare]

21 minutes ago, Montrose1100 said:

Have you seen the IAH and HOU signs? Giant sculptures with LED lights and some with screens. Not to mention the landscaping.

 

Priorities!

[Purdueenginerd]

Yeah, the sign price I actually think sounds about normal for what I would expect fom IAH and HOU Signs. My smirk is more of a, "why spend a million dollars of tax-payer dollars on a sign". I'm being a bit of a debbie downer on this one, sorry. 

[Luminare]

1 minute ago, Purdueenginerd said:

Yeah, the sign price I actually think sounds about normal for what I would expect fom IAH and HOU Signs. My smirk is more of a, "why spend a million dollars of tax-payer dollars on a sign". I'm being a bit of a debbie downer on this one, sorry. 

 

Its really more like...we gotta build this giant new awesome spaceport...but wait! We can't do this without a proper marquee sign!

 

Its just a bit ridiculous.

[Montrose1100]

41 minutes ago, Luminare said:

 

Its really more like...we gotta build this giant new awesome spaceport...but wait! We can't do this without a proper marquee sign!

 

Its just a bit ridiculous.

Do it right or don't do it all. After all, this is the first sign the aliens/martians will see upon entering not only Houston, but potentially Earth.

[Moore713]

Well it appears the Spaceport is chugging along 

 Estimate say  could create up to 1000 jobs there

Edited December 22, 2020 by Moore713
Update

[HOUCAJUN]

This is great news! 1000 people employed. This is probably one of the biggest projects in Houston under the radar.

[texan]

Just want to make sure everyone understands the gravity (pun intended) of this. There are three space stations (realistically) under development in the world. China's space station, the lunar gateway, and Axiom's station. The lunar gateway is being led by NASA Johnson and Axiom's will be developed and built right here in Houston. Axiom's station is the first commercial space station that I believe will actually make it up, NASA has already given them money and access to a port on the ISS. There have been many proposals but this one is the most serious to date. They are building modules to attach to the ISS then eventually will break their station off which will be used for tourism and on-orbit manufacturing. In spaceflight, this is a huge deal and Houston could become the center of space manufacturing and space tourism because of it. I am extremely excited to see what this does for Houston.

[Moore713]

2 hours ago, texan said:

Just want to make sure everyone understands the gravity (pun intended) of this. There are three space stations (realistically) under development in the world. China's space station, the lunar gateway, and Axiom's station. The lunar gateway is being led by NASA Johnson and Axiom's will be developed and built right here in Houston. Axiom's station is the first commercial space station that I believe will actually make it up, NASA has already given them money and access to a port on the ISS. There have been many proposals but this one is the most serious to date. They are building modules to attach to the ISS then eventually will break their station off which will be used for tourism and on-orbit manufacturing. In spaceflight, this is a huge deal and Houston could become the center of space manufacturing and space tourism because of it. I am extremely excited to see what this does for Houston.

Exactly plus these kind of projects spur other projects and businesses. If done right i really dont see how this can't become a major space complex..

 

Who knows in 40 years Ellington could be to Houston space industry what TMC is to our medical. 

[texan]

20 hours ago, Moore713 said:

Exactly plus these kind of projects spur other projects and businesses. If done right i really dont see how this can't become a major space complex..

 

Who knows in 40 years Ellington could be to Houston space industry what TMC is to our medical. 

Yep. JSC has been an uncapitalized asset for decades. That is changing. It seems inevitable that Clear Lake will become the "space TMC" but engaged leaders can help it be more successful. Just at Houston Spaceport you already have a major astronaut training facility (jets and the Neutral Buoyancy Lab) so with Axiom I think this has the potential to launch (again, pun intended) the Houston Spaceport. I really hope the whole area reaps the benefits and I think it will. Clear Lake needs some work and redevelopment to support world class work like this. Just last week Nanoracks (headquartered here) installed the first commercial airlock on the ISS which will be used for research and business purposes. In addition, Collins Aerospace (business unit of Raytheon Technologies) is growing their workforce by a considerable amount at their offices in Houston. It's an exciting time for the area and I hope they seize on the opportunities to make it the best it can be. Houston has the ability to become the center of the space economy and I really hope it seizes on that opportunity.

Edited December 24, 2020 by texan

[texan]

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/space/article/Houston-Spaceport-announces-Collins-Aerospace-as-16188126.php

This is huge! Collins Aerospace will be building a manufacturing and startup incubator facility at the Houston Spaceport. It looks like the city will be lending $25.6 million to build a 120,000 sf building on an 8 acre site? Construction starts in June. Collins does lots of life support equipment work, especially with space suits. They’ll be expanding their presence in Clear Lake as they have a campus at Saturn Lane and NASA Parkway currently. This is especially awesome as Collins is a subsidiary of Raytheon Technologies (created from the merger of Rockwell-Collins, Raytheon, and United Technologies Corporation), a Fortune 100 company (I believe).

 

[texan]

4 hours ago, texan said:

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/space/article/Houston-Spaceport-announces-Collins-Aerospace-as-16188126.php

This is huge! Collins Aerospace will be building a manufacturing and startup incubator facility at the Houston Spaceport. It looks like the city will be lending $25.6 million to build a 120,000 sf building on an 8 acre site? Construction starts in June. Collins does lots of life support equipment work, especially with space suits. They’ll be expanding their presence in Clear Lake as they have a campus at Saturn Lane and NASA Parkway currently. This is especially awesome as Collins is a subsidiary of Raytheon Technologies (created from the merger of Rockwell-Collins, Raytheon, and United Technologies Corporation), a Fortune 100 company (I believe).

 

More details (compilation of Houston Chronicle and Houston Business Journal articles):

Collins Aerospace: Collins (through their Hamilton Sundstrand subsidiary) will be building a $25.6 million 120,000 sf manufacturing and office building to be complete by the end of 2022 on 8.4 acres with a 10,000 sf spaceflight startup incubator. This will have capacity for 250 employees and will be used for manufacturing life support systems for civil spaceflight (I'm speculating that they have an agreement to provide ECLSS for Axiom's space station). The city will own this facility. Collins has a right of first refusal option to purchase an additional 8 acres within 3 years.

 

Axiom Space: Axiom will be using $4 million of airport system money and a memorandum of agreement to begin design of their complex. This will be a $120 million, 430,000 sf facility that will include high bay, hangar, flight development and testing, office, and astronaut facility space on 22.5 acres with a right of first refusal on another 9.8 acres. The airport system/city are expected to provide financing later this year for the rest of Axiom's facilities which will begin construction in late 2021 or early 2022. The city will own this facility. Below are progress pictures of their space station.

And their assembly plan:

 

Next anchor tenant: A third major anchor tenant is expected to be announced soon.

 

Great quote here from City Council Member Abbie Kamin: “The fact that we are revitalizing the space industry here in Houston is remarkable, that we’re bringing business, we’re bringing jobs and space exploration back to Space City.”

 

[gene]

amen to that quote!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 🚀🖤

[texan]

I'm so sorry for seemingly spamming this thread but this is my industry area (which I'm obsessively passionate about) and I think I'm bringing new information in each time. Let me know if I should post less!

 

From the Community Impact, a map of the new developments at the Houston Spaceport. That third anchor tenant could be announced next month! In January, Intuitive Machines, a smaller company already at the spaceport will send it's NOVA-C lander to the surface of the moon.

https://communityimpact.com/houston/bay-area/development/2021/05/22/the-future-of-space-city-houston-spaceport-growing-as-officials-draw-attention-to-industry/

 

Additionally, a space-focused economic development organization, TexSpace, has been founded to help bring more space companies to the Galveston Bay Area. Hopefully they are successful and lead to a lot of redevelopment in the Clear Lake area (maybe even some urbanization???).

https://www.texspace.org

 

A small company called Venus Aerospace is relocating to the spaceport from California. Their goal is to design and build a hypersonic aircraft traveling at Mach 12.

https://communityimpact.com/houston/bay-area/impacts/2021/05/07/impacts-roundup-spaceplane-developer-coming-to-clear-lake-and-more-aerospace-news/

 

Lastly, the new NASA administrator, former Senator Bill Nelson, this week began lobbying Congress for $11 billion out of the infrastructure bill. Of this, $5.4 billion would go to construction and renovation projects at NASA field centers. I expect Johnson Space Center to be a big winner as it is one of the largest and most important NASA field centers and has quite a few asbestos-filled, aging buildings. So stay tuned on that, if the bill passes, hopefully we see quite a bit of construction and renovation at JSC in the next few years.

https://spacenews.com/nelson-uses-chinese-mars-landing-as-a-warning-to-congress/

[j_cuevas713]

59 minutes ago, texan said:

I'm so sorry for seemingly spamming this thread but this is my industry area (which I'm obsessively passionate about) and I think I'm bringing new information in each time. Let me know if I should post less!

 

From the Community Impact, a map of the new developments at the Houston Spaceport. That third anchor tenant could be announced next month! In January, Intuitive Machines, a smaller company already at the spaceport will send it's NOVA-C lander to the surface of the moon.

https://communityimpact.com/houston/bay-area/development/2021/05/22/the-future-of-space-city-houston-spaceport-growing-as-officials-draw-attention-to-industry/

 

Additionally, a space-focused economic development organization, TexSpace, has been founded to help bring more space companies to the Galveston Bay Area. Hopefully they are successful and lead to a lot of redevelopment in the Clear Lake area (maybe even some urbanization???).

https://www.texspace.org

 

A small company called Venus Aerospace is relocating to the spaceport from California. Their goal is to design and build a hypersonic aircraft traveling at Mach 12.

https://communityimpact.com/houston/bay-area/impacts/2021/05/07/impacts-roundup-spaceplane-developer-coming-to-clear-lake-and-more-aerospace-news/

 

Lastly, the new NASA administrator, former Senator Bill Nelson, this week began lobbying Congress for $11 billion out of the infrastructure bill. Of this, $5.4 billion would go to construction and renovation projects at NASA field centers. I expect Johnson Space Center to be a big winner as it is one of the largest and most important NASA field centers and has quite a few asbestos-filled, aging buildings. So stay tuned on that, if the bill passes, hopefully we see quite a bit of construction and renovation at JSC in the next few years.

https://spacenews.com/nelson-uses-chinese-mars-landing-as-a-warning-to-congress/

Great news!!! 

[Tumbleweed_Tx]

Ray Manzerik once told me "I liked the way you accented that, that was cool, do it more, don't be shy." 

So, yeah, if you have info, post it! That's what this site is for

[thatguysly]

https://abc13.com/science/120k-square-foot-campus-breaking-ground-at-houston-spaceport/10756941/