Jump to content

Forbes article addressing common flaws in modern city planning.


Recommended Posts

Instead, plans discuss and advance a set of what appear to be measures of city health that are clearly more faddish than practical. 

 

I am willing to bet that this article, if anyone reads it at all, will be thoroughly dissed on this forum, where all of the urbanistas speak of faddish ideas and dis Houston for not employing more faddish rules. I look forward to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am willing to bet that this article, if anyone reads it at all, will be thoroughly dissed on this forum, where all of the urbanistas speak of faddish ideas and dis Houston for not employing more faddish rules. I look forward to it.

Did anyone post the WSJ love letter on Annise Parker and the city yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am willing to bet that this article, if anyone reads it at all, will be thoroughly dissed on this forum, where all of the urbanistas speak of faddish ideas and dis Houston for not employing more faddish rules. I look forward to it.

 

Precisely why I posted this article, considering most everyone on this forum is an amateur city planner who subscribes to the arts district, walkable urban center, mixed use, diverse, rail, "insert other trend here", etc... definition of city success. Never mind all of that pesky economic and free choice nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...