boounce Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Tone2002... a member since 2008. He makes a single post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 i thought the same thing, only i know of commercial real estate people who have very few posts on haif but are big time lurkers. maybe tone2002 is full of it or maybe he/she just couldn't take it anymore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 DOH!!!! http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/courier/news/camp-strake-to-become-next-market-street-whispers-of-an/article_68a5253f-48a2-5346-a8f7-195987aab7c0.html Despite rumors of another oil & gas company campus, Conroe officials have confirmed that the Camp Strake site will be home to a commercial/residential development and possibly a minor league baseball field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muralpainter Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 I was talking to a friend who works for an unnamed firm up in The Woodlands, and they are saying that Shell did buy the Camp Strake land and will build there soon enough. Maybe a Shell gas station. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted July 18, 2013 Author Share Posted July 18, 2013 Same source told me that they put in a bid for a shell building on the Boy Scouts property Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 the article about the sale to johnson states that residential is only 50 percent of the 2100 acres. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 the article about the sale to johnson states that residential is only 50 percent of the 2100 acres. The rest of the property will be a park, as it's mostly flood plain and floodway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 I was excited about the idea of The Woodlands getting a 35-40 story highrise for Shell because it would have helped develop the already existing skyline in The Woodlands, but wow way up at the camp strake site I'm kinda disappointed about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted July 19, 2013 Author Share Posted July 19, 2013 Just to clarify, my source didn't mention anything about height Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 My elevator guy just told me Shell is planning on building a 35-40 story tower in The Woodlands and that Anadarko wants to build another one too.Can anyone confirm this?Just to clarify, my source didn't mention anything about heightSo are these two different sources? Two different buildings ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted July 19, 2013 Author Share Posted July 19, 2013 So are these two different sources? Two different buildings ?Same source. He didn't say anything about height this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 It is mind blowing how much Houston is expanding... The only thing I wish for the Northern Suburbs & Exurbs is that they keep and/or replant trees. Those Pines are about the only natural beauty that area has. I hope they follow the Woodlands' example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 It is mind blowing how much Houston is expanding... The only thing I wish for the Northern Suburbs & Exurbs is that they keep and/or replant trees. Those Pines are about the only natural beauty that area has. I hope they follow the Woodlands' example. the camp strake buyer is required to maintain a 50 ft natural buffer by the city of conroe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muralpainter Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 You mean the 50-foot swath they just cut down for the pipeline? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 You mean the 50-foot swath they just cut down for the pipeline? no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muralpainter Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 no Sorry. Failed attempt at sarcasm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Sorry. Failed attempt at sarcasm. no worries. i make the same mistake, thinking everyone should know the tone of voice in my head. i too wondered if the 50 foot buffer was lost because of the 50 foot clearance for the pipeline........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Shell will build a large campus between the Woodlands and Conroe. Location is north of 1488. Source: High-up Kinder Morgan consultant who works with Shell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted January 1, 2014 Author Share Posted January 1, 2014 This is awful news. They're gonna need to widen 45 up north the way they did I-10. The Woodlands area is a nice bedroom community but awful to travel to. It better at least have direct access to the freeway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intencity77 Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Shell will build a large campus between the Woodlands and Conroe. Location is north of 1488. Source: High-up Kinder Morgan consultant who works with Shell.Bad news since this sounds like Shell will be vacating their downtown offices...IF this is true and IF Exxon and Shell turn out to be proof of some kind of suburban campus pattern taking root, this is definitely going to be a huge threat to future downtown office vacancy rates and office tower construction. Let's hope Chevron isn't thinking of jumping ship too and doing a suburban campus instead, especially since their proposed downtown tower was recently put on hold. Meanwhile, the City of Houston better up the ante on enticing the major energy companies downtown from flying out to the suburbs or Montgomery County. Not to knock our neighbor to the North, but it would be awful for downtown to end up with empty buildings, high vacancy rates and very little office construction as downtown Dallas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToryGattis Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Bad news since this sounds like Shell will be vacating their downtown offices...IF this is true and IF Exxon and Shell turn out to be proof of some kind of suburban campus pattern taking root, this is definitely going to be a huge threat to future downtown office vacancy rates and office tower construction. Let's hope Chevron isn't thinking of jumping ship too and doing a suburban campus instead, especially since their proposed downtown tower was recently put on hold. Meanwhile, the City of Houston better up the ante on enticing the major energy companies downtown from flying out to the suburbs or Montgomery County. Not to knock our neighbor to the North, but it would be awful for downtown to end up with empty buildings, high vacancy rates and very little office construction as downtown Dallas. I agree. I've been worried that the Exxon campus is the canary in the coal mine. Rush hour traffic has gotten so bad they're looking at getting out of the core for suburban campuses. I've always said Houston needs to step it up with a more comprehensive network of HOT lanes and express bus services to all of the core job centers, or we could end up like stagnant downtown Dallas. Houston has been lucky to have thriving suburbs all around it with most of the jobs in the core. If that switches to a thriving arc of jobs and residents from Sugar Land to the Energy Corridor to The Woodlands, the core and east of Houston will suffer, just like it has in Dallas vs. their northwestern suburbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Bad news since this sounds like Shell will be vacating their downtown offices...IF this is true and IF Exxon and Shell turn out to be proof of some kind of suburban campus pattern taking root, this is definitely going to be a huge threat to future downtown office vacancy rates and office tower construction. Let's hope Chevron isn't thinking of jumping ship too and doing a suburban campus instead, especially since their proposed downtown tower was recently put on hold. Meanwhile, the City of Houston better up the ante on enticing the major energy companies downtown from flying out to the suburbs or Montgomery County. Not to knock our neighbor to the North, but it would be awful for downtown to end up with empty buildings, high vacancy rates and very little office construction as downtown Dallas.Shell has One and Two Shell Plaza through 2025. They also just moved their trading operations into 1000 Main in 2012. I don't think there is any reason think Shell will be abandoning downtown any time very soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Shell will build a large campus between the Woodlands and Conroe. Location is north of 1488. Source: High-up Kinder Morgan consultant who works with Shell. that would be the camp strake site......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 that would be the camp strake site.........http://blog.chron.com/primeproperty/2013/11/camp-strake-sale-finalized/#14048101=0 I'm not sure about that. I don't want to lie and say I know where it's being built. I was simply told north of 1488. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
august948 Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 I agree. I've been worried that the Exxon campus is the canary in the coal mine. Rush hour traffic has gotten so bad they're looking at getting out of the core for suburban campuses. I've always said Houston needs to step it up with a more comprehensive network of HOT lanes and express bus services to all of the core job centers, or we could end up like stagnant downtown Dallas. Houston has been lucky to have thriving suburbs all around it with most of the jobs in the core. If that switches to a thriving arc of jobs and residents from Sugar Land to the Energy Corridor to The Woodlands, the core and east of Houston will suffer, just like it has in Dallas vs. their northwestern suburbs. If there is a long-term trend to pulling out of downtown in favor of the suburbs, could some of the existing downtown buildings be converted to residential? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
august948 Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 I agree. I've been worried that the Exxon campus is the canary in the coal mine. Rush hour traffic has gotten so bad they're looking at getting out of the core for suburban campuses. I've always said Houston needs to step it up with a more comprehensive network of HOT lanes and express bus services to all of the core job centers, or we could end up like stagnant downtown Dallas. Houston has been lucky to have thriving suburbs all around it with most of the jobs in the core. If that switches to a thriving arc of jobs and residents from Sugar Land to the Energy Corridor to The Woodlands, the core and east of Houston will suffer, just like it has in Dallas vs. their northwestern suburbs. It'll be interesting to see what Metro's reinvention plan turns out to be with regards to this. I, too, advocate expanded express or park and ride service to core centers around town. Then local bus routes could tie into those. With energy business cores located in downtown, The Woodlands and the energy corridor I would imagine it would be quite useful to have express bus service between all three so employees could shuttle back and forth for meetings and such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 http://blog.chron.com/primeproperty/2013/11/camp-strake-sale-finalized/#14048101=0 I'm not sure about that. I don't want to lie and say I know where it's being built. I was simply told north of 1488. well, except for the fact that three other people have heard rumors regarding a major energy company building at camp strake since june. also, rumored that shell bid on the camp strake property (north of 1488, south of conroe). that said, there are other properties north of 1488. but, just as springwoods development was announced prior to exxonmobil; johnson development company has announced their development plans prior to the shell information. camp strake or not, the woodlands will be "bookended" (new word) by two of the world's top oil companies. i wonder what home prices are like in the river plantation and crighton ridge subdivisions these days? it might be a good time to buy something. http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Conroe-TX-77302/91832_rid/days_sort/30.266388,-95.427568,30.241847,-95.469582_rect/14_zm/1_fr/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muralpainter Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 http://blog.chron.com/primeproperty/2013/11/camp-strake-sale-finalized/#14048101=0 I'm not sure about that. I don't want to lie and say I know where it's being built. I was simply told north of 1488. Interesting that the previous Camp Strake / Grand Lake Park website recently went down. Will only add to the rumor and speculation process.http://www.grandlakepark.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Highly skeptical that Shell will be making a wholesale move to a new Camp Strake campus... for a variety of reasons. 1. Why would someone, anyone, at Kinder Morgan be privy to confidential Shell information?2. As noted above, Shell recently entered into new long-term leases for their HQ space downtown and their trading space downtown.3. Shell has recently expanded/is currently expanding their large Woodcreek campus.4. A massive corporate campus does not appear to be in Johnson Development's plans for the Camp Strake property.5. The Camp Strake site would be a horrible location for a corporate consolidation. The ExxonMobil site suffers from being far north, but it is/will be at the intersection of three major expressways (I-45, Hardy Tollroad and Grand Parkway) and is 11+ miles closer in than Camp Strake.6. Shell is moving to Oklahoma City. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 First off, let me just say my source knows what he is talking about. Without revealing too much of my profession, I work with a wide range of clientele. That's how I know about the new facade coming to One Allen Center. My source is a senior consultant (in his 60s) that used to work for El Paso and now does the major consultation with Shell for Kinder Morgan. He clearly would be the one to know this information since he knows a great deal about the inner-workings of Shell. Now here's the nail in the coffin for how I KNOW Shell is building a campus:My source planned on selling one of his homes that he happens to have in Jacobs Reserve. He was told NOT to sell his home just yet. Shell knows when they build this campus, the property values in the area will increase. They advised him to wait but he can sell it whenever, of course. After that, he is now waiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.