Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Slipping off topic again, but Thirteen Pies, de Boulle Jeweler's, American Food + Drink, Toulouse and soon St. Bernard. However, to make it relevant, some of these could make good gfr for 609...especially the restaurants and a high end jeweler.

What benefit does a high end jewelry store, Louis Vuitton, or Tiffanys, provide to downtown Houston and Hines tenants? An Apple store I agree would be awesome, and you can't go wrong with a solid restaurant. Maybe after all the new residential towers fill up with wealthy residents the market will warrant some high end retail, but don't those kind of retailers generally prefer co tenancy? They'd be better off at GreenStreet or along Dallas Ave than segregated in the ground floor of an office building.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DT Houston is missing major retail $$$$, because its retail is mediocre at best.

 

If they can secure Bloomingdale's (to the old Sakowitz building), bring Macy's back (at the base of the Marlowe), and add a Nordstrom (at the base of a tower further down Dallas Street), all the other retail requisites will fall into place along the corridor. DT Houston would never be the same, and this retail catalyst would cause DT to erupt into a new wave of development that would make this most recent/current boom look tame. If they can get this underway, there wouldn't be one vacant lot left in DT Houston...every one of them would be under development.

There you go bashing on Houston again you hater!  

 

But I'm sure all this retail will happen in downtown if we can just get the people who are trying to destroy the US and Israel out of office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way they are bigger is that they are taller.  The floor plates of 609 Main @ Texas are about 28,000 square feet.  Wells Fargo Plaza I think is about 25,000 sq feet.  I think 600 Travis (the former Chase Tower) is closer to 22,000 square feet.

 

And 609 Main is supposed to be only 24 feet shorter than Bank of America Center, so it doesn't exactly pale in comparison.

 

Interesting, I really would have thought that Wells Fargo had a much bigger floor plan. I stand corrected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummmm, square footage is just a result of height, width and depth. The post to which I was responding stated that the older towers were not just taller, but bigger as well. Since height was already mentioned, it seemed he had to have been talking about the other two dimensions. I just pointed out that in fact the only sense in which they are bigger is height. That's all.

But thanks for providing the square footage information.

I think you are confusing square footage with cubic footage.

Most people in the real estate world as well as the skyscraper enthusiast world measure a building's size by its square footage. jmitch's "bigger as well" point captures something that your response to him ignores, which is that the degree to which those older buildings are bigger than 609 is even greater than the degree to which they are taller.

Edited by H-Town Man
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There you go bashing on Houston again you hater!  

 

But I'm sure all this retail will happen in downtown if we can just get the people who are trying to destroy the US and Israel out of office.

Yeah because the administration has so much control over what buildings and department stores come to Houston...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Chase and Wells Fargo cover almost the entire block where as 609's tower portion is only half. 

 

If you look at the Chase Tower it actually has a significant set back on Capitol and Milam. I would say its probably only built on half of the block as well. I have actually always thought that the plates of chase Tower were rather small. I imagine as someone metioned earlier they did this to go higher. Wells also has a pretty big setback on Louisiana and and is by no means built to the edge on the other sides.

 

I do agree with you on the beefier comment thought. For some reason those towers just seem huge. I think its probably just perspective. I was just admiring the dominant presense of Williams Tower in the Galleria yesterday but if you dropped it in downtown it would be ther third tallest and just look like one of the other towers in downtown. By no means am I diminishing Williams either just saying there is something to be said about perspective.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the total square footage of Wells vs Chase? I would figure Wells is significantly more. The Capitol/Milam setback of Chase is pretty significant. Wells feels fairly "centered", offset toward Smith a bit, but pretty equal in the other direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the total square footage of Wells vs Chase? I would figure Wells is significantly more. The Capitol/Milam setback of Chase is pretty significant. Wells feels fairly "centered", offset toward Smith a bit, but pretty equal in the other direction.

 

Chase - 1,980,000 SF

Wells Fargo - 1,833,760 SF

 

The plot thickens...

 

(I'm not sure if that's TOTAL sf or just usable - My calculations were based on what I could measure on foot  :ph34r: )

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chase tower - 1,656,529

Wells Fargo Plaza - 1,721,242

Thank you.

So with 71 floors, Wells Fargo has a floor plate of approximately 24,242 square feet.

600 Travis, with 75 floors, has approximately 22,000 square foot floor plates.

609 Main @Travis floor plates are 28,000 square feet.

Simple math tells us the 609 Main tower takes up more of the block than either 600 Travis or Wells Fargo.

I can't account for peoples' (mis)perceptions, (except to remind once again that 609 Main is far from complete), but the fact is, the 609 Main tower is bulkier than either of the tall boys.

Edited by Houston19514
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wells Fargo certainly looks bulkier than 600 Travis( p.s. when did the name change ?). The old World Trade Center towers make those two small in comparison. There some image overlay of them in downtown houston.

Indeed. The old World Trade Center towera had floor plates of more than 40,000 square feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the just seem beefier for lack of better words. Also do they have parking like 609 main will have?

 

Chase and Wells (and Pennzoil, One Shell, Bank of America, etc.) do not sit on above ground parking podiums, although they do have a very limited amount of parking in the sub basement levels.  Chase does have a garage across the street that was built at the same time; its upper floors at one time housed the "back office" functions that don't take as much square footage now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chase tower - 1,656,529

Wells Fargo Plaza - 1,721,242

 

Did you get these from Costar? I wonder what would account for the Chase tower number being so much lower than the oft-published figure of 1,980,000. Certainly the building doesn't have that much common area, that it would be a GBA/NRA difference. I wonder if the larger figure included 601 Travis across the street, which I see has a surprising 415,390 SF (office + retail). Maybe the 1.98M was the office space total of the two buildings together....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting, the Hines website says it's 1.7 million square feet, but the building's website (linked from the Hines site) says 1.98 million square feet of gross office building space

 

I wonder if maybe the owner allocated a chunk of 600 Travis to 601 Travis. There is no way that 601 Travis has 415,000 SF on just 3 or however many floors. That's almost the size of the Hilcorp tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if maybe the owner allocated a chunk of 600 Travis to 601 Travis. There is no way that 601 Travis has 415,000 SF on just 3 or however many floors. That's almost the size of the Hilcorp tower.

The building is listed as 20 floors with 12 floors of parking, so about 8 floors of lease space, at least some of which are almost 53,000 square feet. There's also lease space on the ground and tunnel levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The building is listed as 20 floors with 12 floors of parking, so about 8 floors of lease space, at least some of which are almost 53,000 square feet. There's also lease space on the ground and tunnel levels.

 

There is additional space in sub basements - that's where Texas Commerce Bank ran its back of the house operations, and where the armored trucks come in to this day.  

 

Think of it as a TARDIS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is additional space in sub basements - that's where Texas Commerce Bank ran its back of the house operations, and where the armored trucks come in to this day.  

 

Think of it as a TARDIS.

So you are a time lord Mollusk. I hope Davros or The Master are not Haifers or your cover is blown!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if maybe the owner allocated a chunk of 600 Travis to 601 Travis. There is no way that 601 Travis has 415,000 SF on just 3 or however many floors. That's almost the size of the Hilcorp tower.

 

it does - it has 7 true office floors of which 4 of the floor plates are around 65-70K RSF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to 609 Main at Texas
  • The title was changed to 609 Main At Texas

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...