Jump to content

Dome over Houston


Highway6

Recommended Posts

It looked to be more than 1 mile in diameter to me, but let's go with that. That's .785 square miles covered, and if we had a 6-inch downpour as cited in the Category 2 hurricane scene, that's a runoff of 251.2 acre feet of water. Hopefully Original Timmy Chan is reading this and can give us his engineer's opinion on how to deal with that (if it's possible).

What I'd like to see is a gigantic concrete-lined channel. Think Brays Bayou, but without all the trees and jogging trails. Lots of chain-link fences and guard rails along the edges. Hopefully the channel wouldn't be required to follow the curve of the dome...I much prefer straight lines (and 90-deg angles if possible) to anything with a curve. Maybe that's just the engineer in me.

You asked how to deal with it "if it's possible." You should know that ANYTHING'S possible, with enough time and $$$.

Actually I wouldn't think that the runoff would be too terribly bad. 250 acre-feet is really not a frightening volume of water...HCFCD has built many detention ponds that exceed that size. For example, the basins at Art Storey Park hold somewhere in the range of 3,400 ac-ft of water (or put another way, that's about 700,000 dump truck loads of dirt.)

I think the cost of drainage would be relatively minor in the scheme of things for this project.

Think of it this way...if you were going to go develop 0.785 square miles (500 ac) of raw land, you'd be required by HCFCD to store at least 275 ac-ft of runoff anyways (0.55 ac-ft/ac). That's just a standard minimum requirement by HCFCD...and developments exceed that minimum requirement pretty regularly due to various site conditions.

In any event, I don't think you need to worry about drainage for this project. Don't think we'll see this in our lifetimes. Seems pretty silly to me...but maybe they made a better case for it in the TV show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine that the modular panels would HAVE be a very sophisticated skin system which at a minimum would entail solutions for heat exchange, silica dehumidification, external rain water collection, filtering, and purging (yes, clean rain inside the dome). It would also have to "touch the earth lightly," meaning that it's structural basis might be in the form of a gigantic central umbrella or series of mushroom structures, or linear ribs spoking from the CBD and based on our existing infrastructural ROW's, or even a series of outer space based matrix trusses (of course they would need extensive stabilizers you know for those pesky solar winds).

Missed this show but it sounds interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After watching this, some observations and questions:

I think it's funny how they see Houston "in peril" as if this doens't happen, Houston will dissapear and become inhabitabel.

How soon could this be built? Hurricane season is about 5 months, right? It takes over a year to two years to build a high-rise. Could a partially finished dome survive a hurricane that even partially hits Houston?

If those people are so confident in the strength of their material, why aren't they jumping on it like a trampoline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After watching this, some observations and questions:

I think it's funny how they see Houston "in peril" as if this doens't happen, Houston will dissapear and become inhabitabel.

I for one believe that the earth is getting hotter (that's recordable on surface temp, up 1 degree centigrade in about the last 100 years)...so we are likely to see more and more storms on the Katrina level.

I think a major concern is if something like Katrina hit Houston directly, the country would have a gasoline shortage fairly quickly. So again...why would this dome not be focused on protecting the port where all the oil comes in and the refinery sector where all the petrol products are made?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a major concern is if something like Katrina hit Houston directly, the country would have a gasoline shortage fairly quickly. So again...why would this dome not be focused on protecting the port where all the oil comes in and the refinery sector where all the petrol products are made?

REALLY bad idea. It is dangerous (and stinky) enough when the wind is too calm around there. Ambient levels of lots of pollutants would be much higher than they are now if it were a closed system (even if force-ventilated, I don't think it would approache the dispersion you get from wind and open atmosphere). That much combustion and those amounts of chemicals/crudes/refined petroleum kept in a bubble with people is a recipe for disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they just talked about the dome on channel 2 news.

come on, its not like its realistic enough to really cover on the city news.

seems rediculous to me

I was at Cedar Creek (damn packed) and saw this is. Needless to say that I didn't hear anything, and even though drunk, I thougth it was weird that they covered like actual news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one believe that the earth is getting hotter (that's recordable on surface temp, up 1 degree centigrade in about the last 100 years)...so we are likely to see more and more storms on the Katrina level.

I think a major concern is if something like Katrina hit Houston directly, the country would have a gasoline shortage fairly quickly. So again...why would this dome not be focused on protecting the port where all the oil comes in and the refinery sector where all the petrol products are made?

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG...OMG, WRONG!!!!!!!!!!! Jesus, now I need a drink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So again...why would this dome not be focused on protecting the port where all the oil comes in and the refinery sector where all the petrol products are made?

That sounds like a good entrepreneurial idea! I think it could work, but it would have to be modified specifically for refining.

I personally don't like the idea a dome over downtown Houston. It would limit the height of and future building and it would also mess up the view. But, I think that It could work if a developer wanted to create a shopping district or something similar where people could walk around and shop no matter what the weather is like. It would also attract people to it just because that are interested in what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds like a good entrepreneurial idea! I think it could work, but it would have to be modified specifically or refining.

Still a VERY BAD idea. See post #44. Pollution is tolerable and "safe" based on the fact that it will disperse as it is emitted. Bottling it up would be deadly, even if it's piped out of the top you have a huge potential for releases/spills/fires within a closed space and it'll never be worth the risk to those living/working in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the stupidest, dumbass thing that I have heard in a long time. Can you imagine the cost to cool this thing? Look at what it costs to keep your home livable. What about the cost to keep the air clean, we can't even do that without a dome. Get real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 posts and not a single reference yet to Logan's Run???????

I'll be like the wise old dude on the outside with the cats and the ruins of DC. Everyone can risk death to escape the domed city and come live out their natural lives with me in freedom, on the weedy, decaying east side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We must really be bored to even spend time discussing this. It was a stupid idea on the TV show and it's not getting any better with further discussion.

Geesh, what a Captain Bringdown! Let us have fun mocking this already self-mocking prospect. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...