Jump to content

Houston Methodist Inpatient North Campus TMC


Jax

Recommended Posts

  • 2 years later...

I was in the area last weekend, does anyone know what the parcel directly south from the phase I bldg is intended for?

The site I speak of has been cleared and it has a couple of boolean merged cylinders in the above rendering. It also looks like the existing bldg on the site is being demo'd by the looks of it's empty fenestration.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in the area last weekend, does anyone know what the parcel directly south from the phase I bldg is intended for?

The site I speak of has been cleared and it has a couple of boolean merged cylinders in the above rendering. It also looks like the existing bldg on the site is being demo'd by the looks of it's empty fenestration.

I don't know what it is, but per the HCAD map, that's part of the St. Luke's parcel. http://www.hcad.org/iMaps/Tiles/Color/5355C3.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like this is a no-go - for now. According to this article by Nancy (and posted by Editor on a different thread): http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/sarnoff/7595071.html

A building project for Methodist Hospital in the Texas Medical Center has been shelved amid an uncertain economy and health care policy changes.

The 1.8 million square-foot project was designed for a site at the corner of John Freeman and Bertner. Ground breaking was scheduled for the first quarter of next year.

Too bad. It's a nice looking complex. Perhaps it'll be built in the future.

I wonder what this means for the overall expansion of the TMC. Obviously, 1.8 million square ft is a lot, but what about other expansion efforts? Are they halted too?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in the area last weekend, does anyone know what the parcel directly south from the phase I bldg is intended for?

The site I speak of has been cleared and it has a couple of boolean merged cylinders in the above rendering. It also looks like the existing bldg on the site is being demo'd by the looks of it's empty fenestration.

Per Stephen, yes it looks to be on parcel 2A-10 or as you said to the south on the St Luke's parcel.

Here's what I think is the existing bldg I mentioned before:

http://www.cardcow.com/289886/texas-childrens-hospital-houston/

Edited by infinite_jim
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

What is the construction going on south of the existing shorter hospital building next to this site? Does it have anything to do with this Methodist expansion? I like the flow of the planned buildings.

That would be St Luke's on going deconstruction of their orginal 1954 buiding. Thay have started and stopped this project several times in the past years. Now that they have a new owner they may get the thing finally deomolished.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

It looks like it's hitting it's stride again after a short breather! First the Hotel/Apartment project, then MemorialHermann, and now Methodist are all proposing new towers that should begin shortly! I also forgot St. Lukes is planning some growth plans although if I recall correctly they are mainly just replacing old space. The primary hospitals as well as TMC's efforts to get some for profit businesses in the area are going to create some good years ahead. Combined with the residential boom that is beginning to happen in the area and the Texas Medical Center is again going to be a very busy part of town!

http://www.chron.com/business/medical/article/Houston-Methodist-to-build-Woodlands-hospital-5513231.php#photo-6371297

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

H-Town. The provocative mural not withstanding, what is it that you find great? Or at least better than the initial design.

Looking for a conversation not an argument.

 

Well, I definitely like the side view more than the rendering Triton posted. Like the articulation of floors - reminds me of mid-century modernism.

 

I don't think the mural is provocative. What does it provoke, other than the recollection that Methodism is a Christian denomination?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

idk what some of you are talking about but the first building was boring looking. Not to mention that was clearly a conceptual model. By the way I don't want people complaining on here that all we do is boring plain glass buildings, but defend the boring first rendering as "sleek, and sexy". What is "sleek, and sexy" is this latest iteration. It is visually more interesting than the other and is a more refined design. Stop falling in love with conceptual renderings guys (for any building). All they are there for is to display possibilities, not actuality. 

Edited by Luminare
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I liked about the initial concept that it blended and flowed so well with the Research Institute, which is a handsome, well executed quality building. It took the RI's scale and blended it elegantly into the taller structure which would more match Methodist's Outpatient Building which faces Main, which has to be seen as The institution's identity in the skyline. This is what is so sexy. Didn't seem boxy to me. The new rendering doesn't seem to want to have anything to do with the rest of Methodist's collection of buildings. In fact it seems to compete with them. Doesn't it?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

idk what some of you are talking about but the first building was boring looking. Not to mention that was clearly a conceptual model. By the way I don't want people complaining on here that all we do is boring plain glass buildings, but defend the boring first rendering as "sleek, and sexy". What is "sleek, and sexy" is this latest iteration. It is visually more interesting than the other and is a more refined design. Stop falling in love with conceptual renderings guys (for any building). All they are there for is to display possibilities, not actuality. 

you do realize the Research Institute (the shorter wave building) already exists, right? what would make you think the first renderings were conceptual when they blend perfectly well with what is already there?

Thought the view Triton posted was the garage at first. This sucks. Also Luminare the first rendering was nothing like what HAIF complains about. No idea where you pulled that one from

yeah dude... :/ thats the rendering i was referring to in my post about the building being as wide as it is tall and the side facade being completely bare.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't quite understand the hostility towards this, and the open praise for the silly looking 6 Houston Center?  Neither are great architectural works, yet both are better than other buildings that have been built in this town over the years.

 

Also, why would any religious imagery in a Methodist afliated institution cause an uproar?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't quite understand the hostility towards this, and the open praise for the silly looking 6 Houston Center?  Neither are great architectural works, yet both are better than other buildings that have been built in this town over the years.

 

Also, why would any religious imagery in a Methodist afliated institution cause an uproar?

 

I don't know why either. If I was the reason for it then I'm sorry, but not for my comment. I think it's a fair assessment that I made stating that many always complain that we build the same all glass buildings, but because this one a little more curvy then all the sudden it's the best thing ever.

 

You are right it wouldn't have been any different than any other building in the area or in Houston at all. This one at least now has an identity of its own instead of being some curvy glass tower.

 

Quite frankly though it's not that big of a deal. I didn't know so many people were so attached to that rendering.

 

Lets also talk about it relating to the research institute. If both were serving the same function like (research building 1 and now we are building research building 2) then ok I can by that, but this one is a completely different building. It's also not like the research institute was blazing a new trail in Architecture even for the Medical Center. It's quite tame imo and very conservative so I don't see why this new building which is double the floors has to play it safe as well.

 

I don't know....if y'all really like the other rendering then that's cool. I just have to disagree with that.

Edited by Luminare
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


11557_hr.jpg

11558_hr.jpg

 

this original HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL concept, is a design TOUR DE FORCE!  something that houston methodist hospital has become known for, as per the last decade or so.  not to mention, this particular concept is definitely worth the estimated cost of $540 million dollars... that shall now be utilized as per this very latest concept noted below.  the latest concept, that is indeed dull, and quite uninspiring to say the least.  trust me, we are not trying in earnest to become brash / crude, as per our approach to houston methodist hospital progress.  it is just that houston methodist, has so indeed spoiled us over these decades.. with their state of the art edifice design concepts, never before seen throughout the houston medical landscape.

 

 

14113831409_17bdca00b4_b.jpg

 

Edited by monarch
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why either. If I was the reason for it then I'm sorry, but not for my comment. I think it's a fair assessment that I made stating that many always complain that we build the same all glass buildings, but because this one a little more curvy then all the sudden it's the best thing ever.

 

You are right it wouldn't have been any different than any other building in the area or in Houston at all. This one at least now has an identity of its own instead of being some curvy glass tower.

 

Quite frankly though it's not that big of a deal. I didn't know so many people were so attached to that rendering.

 

Lets also talk about it relating to the research institute. If both were serving the same function like (research building 1 and now we are building research building 2) then ok I can by that, but this one is a completely different building. It's also not like the research institute was blazing a new trail in Architecture even for the Medical Center. It's quite tame imo and very conservative so I don't see why this new building which is double the floors has to play it safe as well.

 

I don't know....if y'all really like the other rendering then that's cool. I just have to disagree with that.

You're making connections where there are none. Just because some of HAIF complains about the same type of glass box building (which they have a point) it doesn't mean that the old rendering is the savior of Houston's architecture. Everyone here against the new rendering is saying the first one LOOKED better. You're also being ignorant of other's opinions. What you might think looks great others might think looks like utter shiet, and vice versa. Don't just assume your viewpoint is higher than everyone else's.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I definitely like the side view more than the rendering Triton posted. Like the articulation of floors - reminds me of mid-century modernism.

 

I don't think the mural is provocative. What does it provoke, other than the recollection that Methodism is a Christian denomination?

 

The building is ok. I like the nod to mid-century modernism as well, but think the side view makes it look massive. Scale seems "off." That said, I do prefer the previous render.

 

As for Jesus;

 

1) Touchdown Jesus. The Catholics should sue the Methodists.

 

2) Jesus is depicted as "white." Historians and the AME should sue.

 

3) Jesus doesn't appear to have feet. Did the Methodist Hospital accidentally amputate them? Jesus should call Terry Bryant and sue.

 

4) Jesus, the name. Sounds Mexicany. Tea Patriots should sue for his birth certificate.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for Jesus;

1) Touchdown Jesus. The Catholics should sue the Methodists.

2) Jesus is depicted as "white." Historians and the AME should sue.

3) Jesus doesn't appear to have feet. Did the Methodist Hospital accidentally amputate them? Jesus should call Terry Bryant and sue.

4) Jesus, the name. Sounds Mexicany. Tea Patriots should sue for his birth certificate.

Well, I guess if none of those lawsuits happen, they all must have decided to turn the other cheek. :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The building is ok. I like the nod to mid-century modernism as well, but think the side view makes it look massive. Scale seems "off." That said, I do prefer the previous render.

The First rendering (of the new look), actually grew on me after looking at the details. The second rendering, showing the other angle, made me frown. The design is actually quite fabulous and reminds me of the jetsons. The bulky corner though kinda stinks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to Houston Methodist Inpatient North Campus TMC

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...