lockmat Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Ok somethings up for sure idk whats going on..but its good! Well, to be fair, that image you posted was in the same .pdf I found, I just didn't realize it was also F.A.C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Well, to be fair, that image you posted was in the same .pdf I found, I just didn't realize it was also F.A.C.Oh its still a new rendering..unless this .pdf has been floating around on the internet since June of last year...I hope brookfield gives out new info on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Oh its still a new rendering..unless this .pdf has been floating around on the internet since June of last year...I hope brookfield gives out new info on this.The website the .pdf was on comes from a copywriter named Dan DeLeo. I emailed him requesting to know when it was published; we'll see if he replies. He's based out of Boston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumapayam Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Ok somethings up for sure idk whats going on..but its good! From Swamplot.. It's just a rehash of lockmat's finding, nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsb320 Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I would not consider this the 'northwest corner' of downtown, as stated on Swamplot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 there's a lot of good renderings out there, i just dont think they can be found electronically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumapayam Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 there's a lot of good renderings out there, i just dont think they can be found electronically. Sorry, I had to use that, okay, back to the being serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 there's a lot of good renderings out there, i just dont think they can be found electronically.Maybe someone can get a hard copy and then scan it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Hmm I see you might be right.but are there any buildings in the U.S that are 5o floors and above 75oft? If so 5 Allen Center has a possibility of being above 75oft.Not sure, but Devon's new tower in OKC is planned to be 54 stories and 925 feet. So 50 stories with 750 feet is certainly possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTAWACS Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 It probably has a spire. Cheaters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsb320 Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I could not find the OKC building on skyscraperpage.com. It looks like their tallest building now is 36 floors and 152.4 m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I could not find the OKC building on skyscraperpage.com. It looks like their tallest building now is 36 floors and 152.4 m.just google devon tower okc.... its a very nice building Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 The website the .pdf was on comes from a copywriter named Dan DeLeo. I emailed him requesting to know when it was published; we'll see if he replies. He's based out of Boston.Thanks for emailing him, I hope he replies.Not sure, but Devon's new tower in OKC is planned to be 54 stories and 925 feet. So 50 stories with 750 feet is certainly possible.Hmm..that adds a possibility of Five Allen being above 75oft as well.Thanks for replying to my post.It probably has a spire. Cheaters.No spire. Flat top like every other Houston building.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Now that Hess is empyting out of the Allen Center, is that enough (along with the economy), to put this on "hold"? The renderings swamplot posted shows the first few floors being taller then the upper ones, like Discovery (Hess) Tower. Maybe the rendering was done when Hess was fishing around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadrunner Posted February 28, 2009 Author Share Posted February 28, 2009 Now that Hess is empyting out of the Allen Center, is that enough (along with the economy), to put this on "hold"? The renderings swamplot posted shows the first few floors being taller then the upper ones, like Discovery (Hess) Tower. Maybe the rendering was done when Hess was fishing around?I think if downtown vacancy rates hold steady around 10% going into 2010, there may be a chance that this could be built. Everything I've heard from the real estate world is that 2010 is going to be the turnaround growth year. Not sure if that notion will hold up through 09, but if it does I would imagine this project would be strongly considered to go forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 http://library.corporate-ir.net/library/91...ch2009FINAL.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 That does not look the same as the old rendering. What vantage point is that from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 That does not look the same as the old rendering. What vantage point is that from? Looking north from downtown...I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTAWACS Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 looks good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citizen4rmptown Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 the rendering was from march 2009, according to the portfolio.....just saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 Five Allen Center will be adjacent to the Allen Center.http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/...AR_MD&A.pdf (pg. 7)EDIT: There will be a skybridge connection to the Allen Center as well.http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?...GU9MQ==&t=1 (pg. 28) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citizen4rmptown Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 Five Allen Center will be adjacent to the Allen Center.http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/...AR_MD&A.pdf (pg. 7)can somebody clarify its location, when they say adjacent, doesn't that mean it WILL be in downtown.but in previous posts it was said it won't be in downtown, but close by. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsb320 Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 can somebody clarify its location, when they say adjacent, doesn't that mean it WILL be in downtown.but in previous posts it was said it won't be in downtown, but close by.I've always assumed that it would be where the giant surface lot is between the Metropolitan Racket Club and the Texas Heritage Museum. I think that at about Dallas St. Do a maps.live aerial. That's the only land available in the Allen Ctr. area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 I've always assumed that it would be where the giant surface lot is between the Metropolitan Racket Club and the Texas Heritage Museum. I think that at about Dallas St. Do a maps.live aerial. That's the only land available in the Allen Ctr. area.This Surface Lot?http://maps.google.com/maps?q=29.75891,-95...=12,303.14,,0,5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsb320 Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 This Surface Lot?http://maps.google.com/maps?q=29.75891,-95...=12,303.14,,0,5Yes, because the new parking garage was recently built at Allen Pkwy across from the Meridian/Double Tree (whatever it is now).There is no other land available in that area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 Yes, because the new parking garage was recently built at Allen Pkwy across from the Meridian/Double Tree (whatever it is now).There is no other land available in that area.Its pretty close to I-45 and it looks as if it will overshadow that texas-sized parking garage and possibly Three Allen Center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 Its pretty close to I-45 and it looks as if it will overshadow that texas-sized parking garage and possibly Three Allen Center.I personally feel like it's a terrible location! If nothing else, it'll destroy the western view of the skyline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 I personally feel like it's a terrible location! If nothing else, it'll destroy the western view of the skyline. I don't see how. Looks to me like it will fill in the gap perfectly....unless you find obscuring the Meridian to be destroying the skyline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 That is definitely the site. And RedScare is right. It's the perfect "in-fill" for the skyline from the west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 the site is directly north of the met garage, northside of dallas in between allen pkwy and I-45.... this is going to be an excellent addition to the skyline. can't wait til they start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.