Houston19514 Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 28 minutes ago, mattyt36 said: Well it’s also kind of on HAS as well for not issuing a press release or coordinating with the media, wouldn’t you say? Perhaps. But that's no excuse. Journalism should be more than just checking the fax machine/email box. A journalist with the slightest bit of curiosity about the world around them could (should) have easily have found this information, without even leaving their house (or bed, for that matter). Do they not even have anyone checking the agendas of City Council and Committee meetings? Truly pathetic. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 On 6/3/2023 at 12:52 PM, Houston19514 said: Perhaps. But that's no excuse. Journalism should be more than just checking the fax machine/email box. A journalist with the slightest bit of curiosity about the world around them could (should) have easily have found this information, without even leaving their house (or bed, for that matter). Do they not even have anyone checking the agendas of City Council and Committee meetings? Truly pathetic. And what would you say the function of a dedicated media relations group is? Not defending the Chronicle, but did any of the TV news stations pick it up? If you operate knowingly in such an environment (it should be no surprise if you’re a professional journalist the quality of the Chronicle reporting, what they are likely to pick up, and what they aren’t), and more press was a goal, you’d kind of be a bit more proactive, no? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 On 6/3/2023 at 12:52 PM, Houston19514 said: Perhaps. But that's no excuse. Journalism should be more than just checking the fax machine/email box. A journalist with the slightest bit of curiosity about the world around them could (should) have easily have found this information, without even leaving their house (or bed, for that matter). Do they not even have anyone checking the agendas of City Council and Committee meetings? Truly pathetic. You're not wrong, but you're also outdated. It's not 1990, or even 2010 anymore. The number of journalists in America — especially in local newsrooms — has plummeted. I'd be surprised if the Chronicle had even a quarter of the number of reporters today that it had in 2000. When I was in television, a 30-minute local news program in a market the size of Houston would have at minimum: two field reporters, two writers, a producer, an associate producer, an executive producer, and an intern or three. Today, it's very often just one field reporter, a producer, and maybe an executive producer shared with other shows. It's so bad that the anchors in Houston are even running their own TelePrompTers. That's why they have one hand on a black knob all the time. People complain about the poor quality and lack of local news, then instead of spending 71¢ a day to support local journalism they choose to get their "news" from social media because they think it's "free." Well, you get what you pay for. Enjoy the world you made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 4 hours ago, editor said: You're not wrong, but you're also outdated. It's not 1990, or even 2010 anymore. The number of journalists in America — especially in local newsrooms — has plummeted. I'd be surprised if the Chronicle had even a quarter of the number of reporters today that it had in 2000. When I was in television, a 30-minute local news program in a market the size of Houston would have at minimum: two field reporters, two writers, a producer, an associate producer, an executive producer, and an intern or three. Today, it's very often just one field reporter, a producer, and maybe an executive producer shared with other shows. It's so bad that the anchors in Houston are even running their own TelePrompTers. That's why they have one hand on a black knob all the time. People complain about the poor quality and lack of local news, then instead of spending 71¢ a day to support local journalism they choose to get their "news" from social media because they think it's "free." Well, you get what you pay for. Enjoy the world you made. So it's MY fault... Got it. ;-) The problem with that with regard to the Chronicle is it wasn't worth the subscription price long before the internet disrupted the economics of the newspaper business. If they actually found some news to report (and reported it accurately), they would generate more clicks and sell more advertising and maybe even some subscriptions. I'd be happy to pay for a subscription for a news service that I could rely on to report on major news items occurring at City Council and Committee meetings, Metro board meetings, etc etc. (and as I previously mentioned, most of it can be covered without leaving one's house, hell, without leaving one's bed!) I'm not sure how television news even came in to this conversation. News flash: local television news has always been free to the viewer. Their cutbacks can hardly be blamed on consumers' unwillingness to pay. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Just hit HBJ with a quote from United (but not one from HAS . . . further proving the point). United Airlines plans redevelopment of Bush Intercontinental's Terminal B - Houston Business Journal (bizjournals.com) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 (edited) 1 hour ago, mattyt36 said: Just hit HBJ with a quote from United (but not one from HAS . . . further proving the point). United Airlines plans redevelopment of Bush Intercontinental's Terminal B - Houston Business Journal (bizjournals.com) In fairness, this is United's project, not the airport's. The presentation to the City Council Economic Development Committee was also done by United, not HAS. Edited June 5 by Houston19514 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 (edited) Back to our regular programming; courtesy of HAS: New D West Pier Edited June 5 by Houston19514 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 2 hours ago, mattyt36 said: Just hit HBJ with a quote from United (but not one from HAS . . . further proving the point). United Airlines plans redevelopment of Bush Intercontinental's Terminal B - Houston Business Journal (bizjournals.com) 1 hour ago, Houston19514 said: In fairness, this is United's project, not the airport's. The presentation to the City Council Economic Development Committee was also done by United, not HAS. [Quoting myself because I missed the brief edit window] I noticed in the HBJ article it said this is subject to final approval by United's board. I suspect United will issue the press releases once that has been achieved. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 19 hours ago, Houston19514 said: In fairness, this is United's project, not the airport's. The presentation to the City Council Economic Development Committee was also done by United, not HAS. Agenda for meeting, item 3, first person listed: Mario Diaz, Director, Houston Airport System. https://www.houstontx.gov/council/committees/econdev/20230531/agenda.pdf Not to mention: (1) I'd say it's pretty "best practice" for an organization to trumpet a multiple hundred-million-dollar investment in one's facility, wouldn't you? (2) The City has responsibility for any apron work, so it is not exclusively a United project. While they may not want much press prior to the Board approval, the documents were presented in a public forum, so one would think it would also behoove them to "control the narrative." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 (edited) 2 hours ago, mattyt36 said: Agenda for meeting, item 3, first person listed: Mario Diaz, Director, Houston Airport System. https://www.houstontx.gov/council/committees/econdev/20230531/agenda.pdf Not to mention: (1) I'd say it's pretty "best practice" for an organization to trumpet a multiple hundred-million-dollar investment in one's facility, wouldn't you? (2) The City has responsibility for any apron work, so it is not exclusively a United project. While they may not want much press prior to the Board approval, the documents were presented in a public forum, so one would think it would also behoove them to "control the narrative." Good for you, Matty. Excellent digging finding that agenda. I actually watched the meeting. Mario was not there. Another HAS person was there. All he did was introduce the United Airlines people and United 100% made the presentation. I suspect they are in agreement that there will not be press releases until the United board approves it. Edited June 6 by Houston19514 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 I just discovered a new tab on the front page of the HAS website labeled "Redevelopment Projects". A lot of good photos, renderings, and videos in there. www.fly2houston.com 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Slides from today's update to City Council Economic Development Committee: https://www.houstontx.gov/council/committees/econdev/20230621/ITRP-Update.pdf In another presentation today, a rough timeline for completion of major airport projects was mentioned: ITRP (International terminal projects) - CY 2024 Major Projects (7-gate expansion and other Southwest projects at Hobby; Skyway, Subway and a Solar farm at Bush) - CY 2027 DTRP (Terminal A Expansion; Terminal D East Pier) - CY 2031 United Rebuild of Terminal B - CY 2027 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennyc05 Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 34 minutes ago, Houston19514 said: Slides from today's update to City Council Economic Development Committee: https://www.houstontx.gov/council/committees/econdev/20230621/ITRP-Update.pdf In another presentation today, a rough timeline for completion of major airport projects was mentioned: ITRP (International terminal projects) - CY 2024 Major Projects (7-gate expansion and other Southwest projects at Hobby; Skyway, Subway and a Solar farm at Bush) - CY 2027 DTRP (Terminal A Expansion; Terminal D East Pier) - CY 2031 United Rebuild of Terminal B - CY 2027 Subway? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 6 minutes ago, kennyc05 said: Subway? Yes, that's the name of the pre-security inter-terminal train. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 16 hours ago, Houston19514 said: Yes, that's the name of the pre-security inter-terminal train. It could use some TLC on those tight little turns. Plus the general space down there is devoid of any human touches. Feel like you're riding a tram into an underground lab (Half-life or Resident Evil style). 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 Wish there were more renderings of the Terminal D renovations. Hard to make much of the ones in the presentation--they make the concourse look like it has lower ceilings than it does (unless those are photos of D1-D3). I also wonder what's being done with all the pre-security space since it will no longer be needed. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 4 hours ago, Montrose1100 said: It could use some TLC on those tight little turns. Plus the general space down there is devoid of any human touches. Feel like you're riding a tram into an underground lab (Half-life or Resident Evil style). They are working on a complete replacement, last I heard. 2 hours ago, mattyt36 said: Wish there were more renderings of the Terminal D renovations. Hard to make much of the ones in the presentation--they make the concourse look like it has lower ceilings than it does (unless those are photos of D1-D3). I also wonder what's being done with all the pre-security space since it will no longer be needed. Yeah, I've been curious about the plans for the soon-to-be vacant space in the Terminal D building. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 2 hours ago, Houston19514 said: They are working on a complete replacement, last I heard. no, say it ain't so! this is so exquisitely dystopian Houston! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleak Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 28 minutes ago, samagon said: no, say it ain't so! this is so exquisitely dystopian Houston! Agreed. I took my girls on it 15+ years ago when they were little. They loved it - talked about it forever. It's uncrowded and something about it's simple utilitarianism is endearing. It's our cheap Disney ride here locally. (literally) 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennyc05 Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 It's embarrassing 😞😞😞 I like Atlanta's subway that goes terminal to terminal. IAH also needs rail to go to the rental car lots instead of the shuttles. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cspwal Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 (edited) there is a train that goes terminal to terminal past security that is more modern Also, technically, the train in Atlanta goes from concourse to concourse Edited June 25 by cspwal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 On 6/22/2023 at 6:36 PM, kennyc05 said: It's embarrassing 😞😞😞 I like Atlanta's subway that goes terminal to terminal. IAH also needs rail to go to the rental car lots instead of the shuttles. Only if one is intent on being embarrassed by everything Houston (as so many HAIFers and Houstonians generally seem to be. There must be something in the water, or maybe it's too many years of reading the chronicle. As cspwal mentioned, IAH also has a modern train inside security, similar to ATL, but we also have the train outside security, something ATL lacks (they offer a shuttle BUS). If anyone should be embarrassed, it's Atlantans. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 (edited) 17 hours ago, Houston19514 said: Only if one is intent on being embarrassed by everything Houston (as so many HAIFers and Houstonians generally seem to be. There must be something in the water, or maybe it's too many years of reading the chronicle. As cspwal mentioned, IAH also has a modern train inside security, similar to ATL, but we also have the train outside security, something ATL lacks (they offer a shuttle BUS). If anyone should be embarrassed, it's Atlantans. yes, and for anyone who knows about them, picking up bags after returning from somewhere in E, D, or C terminal, and then making your way over to A, or B terminal is super simple stuff, and oh so much better than having to mingle with the current traffic situation, or wait in a super long line for the shuttle to your car. just make your way over to A, call your parking lot and they will be there shortly to get shuttle you back to your car. Edited June 26 by samagon 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Have your party(or RideShare) meet you at the Marriott Hotel. So much better that way... 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidCenturyMoldy Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 On 1/4/2023 at 5:03 PM, hindesky said: "Not one, but two art projects are beautifying the community neighboring George Bush Intercontinental Airport in 2023. A 5-ton sculpture of President John F. Kennedy will be installed on John F. Kennedy Boulevard near the airport's southern entrance in East Aldine this month. Oh great. Another giant Mold-A-Rama “sculpture” (https://moldville.arcade-museum.com/45--humble-oil-building.html) from David Adickes. I know this is simply my opinion and apparently not held by most, but his stuff is an embarrassment to Houston. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 On 6/26/2023 at 8:31 AM, samagon said: and for anyone who knows about them, This is a problem in a lot of airports. The art of helping people get where they're going has been lost. Airports around the world seem too wrapped up in "move people past shopping and restaurant opportunities" to realize that their primary function is getting people to their destination. Wayfinding in most of the airports I've been to recently has been abysmal. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman Posted July 20 Share Posted July 20 Looks like Mayor Turner is working to secure direct flights to Africa, possibly three African nations. I wonder how Ethiopian did while they were here as far as passenger counts and if they were successful? Probably not being that that route didn't last long. Direct flights from Houston to Africa may soon be a reality (chron.com) 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBTX Posted July 20 Share Posted July 20 Would love to see a flight to Luanda. Heard great things about it and I have some clients there... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted July 29 Share Posted July 29 New video from HAS showing the construction of two new levels of parking on Terminal C parking garage (which will also connect to the Terminal D/E Central Processor building). https://fly2houston.com/newsroom/articles/more-700-reasons-be-excited-about-new-international-terminal-bush-airport 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted July 29 Share Posted July 29 I finally found a video of last year's State of the Airports presentation. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted July 29 Share Posted July 29 I can no longer edit the previous post. Why was that change made? In any case, scroll to about 49:00, maybe even 50:00 of the State of the Airports presentation to get to the airport system's actual presentation. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 On 11/21/2022 at 12:05 PM, mattyt36 said: You are indeed correct, not sure where I got that idea in my head. Regardless, it is likely to happen in 2022--if it doesn't, for all intents and purposes they will be at the same level. A far cry from IAH historically being a good 25% busier internationally than DFW. HOU is to blame for some of it. AA not having a true hub on the West Coast or East Coast probably proportionally more responsible, but UA has lost a lot of ground to Mexico in particular. If you have a theory as to how this will revert in the future, I'd love to hear it. Otherwise, the substantive point remains the same. Good news, while DFW international traffic did indeed surpass IAH's in 2022, by 1/4 million (2.67%), for the first six months of 2023, IAH is back in the lead, by 164,000 (3.04%). And, as you allowed, when HOU international traffic is added, Houston still led Dallas-Fort Worth in international air passenger traffic in 2022, by about 2/3 million (and the 1st Half/2023 lead widens to more than 2/3 million (12.39%)). 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 15 minutes ago, Houston19514 said: Good news, while DFW international traffic did indeed surpass IAH's in 2022, by 1/4 million (2.67%), for the first six months of 2023, IAH is back in the lead, by 164,000 (3.04%). And, as you allowed, when HOU international traffic is added, Houston still led Dallas-Fort Worth in international air passenger traffic in 2022, by about 2/3 million (and the 1st Half/2023 lead widens to more than 2/3 million (12.39%)). Looks like IAH has about 250K more international departing seats than DFW for CY 2023. Column 4 is 2023, column 3 is 2022: DFW Asia 321,237 444,578 DFW Australasia 84,222 161,262 DFW Caribbean 172,965 227,658 DFW Central America 377,940 451,788 DFW Europe 1,213,984 1,482,990 DFW Middle East 324,872 328,952 DFW North America 3,367,902 3,385,681 DFW South America 316,197 274,282 IAH Asia 132,867 299,298 IAH Australasia 32,974 140,350 IAH Caribbean 214,225 291,248 IAH Central America 1,148,079 1,294,646 IAH Europe 970,508 1,123,930 IAH Middle East 233,423 301,537 IAH North America 2,788,024 3,015,960 IAH South America 578,822 608,190 Of course, North America in the above is Mexico and Canada. Total IAH 2023: 7,075,159 Total DFW 2023: 6,757,191 Still, again, a far cry from the historical comparison, and I'm not sure it's anything to trumpet. Unfortunately, DFW really ate into IAH's historical dominance to Mexico. IAH's marginally higher seats fully attributable to DFW's gap to Central and South America. We'll see if there is any major expansion once the new international gates open, but I'm not holding my breath. I don't think UA is even building a club in the new terminal (we would've heard about it by now from UA, which telegraphs things like that 2 years in advance), which is absolutely pathetic. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBTX Posted August 16 Share Posted August 16 I wonder how much of that is affected by all the construction. Haven't flown internationally out of IAH since April, but my understanding is tremendous progress has been made on Terminal D in that time. I have flights out of there next week and in mid September. Look forward to seeing just how much/how quick that work is being done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBTX Posted August 16 Share Posted August 16 Can we not edit posts anymore? I meant to write "Haven't flown internationally out of IAH since April, when Terminal D was ripped down to its studs and didn't even have floors." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted August 16 Share Posted August 16 20 hours ago, mattyt36 said: We'll see if there is any major expansion once the new international gates open, but I'm not holding my breath. I don't think UA is even building a club in the new terminal (we would've heard about it by now from UA, which telegraphs things like that 2 years in advance), which is absolutely pathetic. United clearly has growth plans for IAH. See their plans for massive rebuild of Terminal.B. It is not pathetic or even surprising that they may not be building a club in Terminal D, as it will continue to be primarily for non-United carriers. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 7 hours ago, Houston19514 said: United clearly has growth plans for IAH. See their plans for massive rebuild of Terminal.B. It is not pathetic or even surprising that they may not be building a club in Terminal D, as it will continue to be primarily for non-United carriers. Wrong, the new D pier was designed in no insignificant part to give UA additional international gate capacity (it should be obvious they have no other options to implement their "massive" growth plans on the international side at the peaks, which is when you want to add new international destinations to maximize connectivity) instead of building the 2008-era proposed FIS at Terminal B. They will be using it--just like they use D today, although I am sure to a higher degree. The fact that they don't use the opportunity to build a build-to-suit flagship club is, indeed, pathetic, given how crowded the existing clubs are. The closest club to those gates will be the already pathetically undersized C-North club. There were plans for a Star Alliance lounge at one point, but I'd think we'd have heard about it by now if it was still the plan. I am not saying they don't have growth plans at IAH because, as you say, they continue to pour money into facilities here and at least pay lip service to growing here. That said, in the last decade (i.e, from 2010 to 2019), UA grew 25% in seat capacity at DEN, 9% at ORD, and shrunk 4% at IAH. Since 2019, it has grown a further 19% in DEN and shrunk another 4% at IAH. Does not scream major growth plans to me. If you say they are sitting out waiting for the construction of D to be over, well, then we can only assume they'll sit out waiting for B to over, which will probably be another 5+ year redevelopment program. Chances are pretty decent there will be another major recession that will upend the existing growth plan and we will still be waiting. IMO IAH is a big hedge for them because they essentially control the facilities, unlike at DEN and ORD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 23 hours ago, JBTX said: I wonder how much of that is affected by all the construction. Well with A and B, it's likely going to be going on for another decade, so I'd say get used to it, i.e., if they aren't growing due to the construction, not sure why we would assume they would in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBTX Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 1 hour ago, mattyt36 said: Well with A and B, it's likely going to be going on for another decade, so I'd say get used to it, i.e., if they aren't growing due to the construction, not sure why we would assume they would in the future. The list provided was for intentional flights, and both international terminals (D and E) plus C to a degree are under consideration right now. That's what I was referring to, less so the rare International flight to Canada in Terminal A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyt36 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 2 hours ago, JBTX said: The list provided was for intentional flights, and both international terminals (D and E) plus C to a degree are under consideration right now. That's what I was referring to, less so the rare International flight to Canada in Terminal A. Well considering a majority of flights to Canada depart from Terminal A, I’m not sure I would use the word “rare.” Any newly added international flight would be low on the O&D scale, and those people are already on the roadways, just connecting at SFO, LAX, ORD, etc., so I don’t think your logic flows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 On 8/15/2023 at 9:03 PM, JBTX said: Can we not edit posts anymore? I meant to write "Haven't flown internationally out of IAH since April, when Terminal D was ripped down to its studs and didn't even have floors." Testing Edit: I seem to be able to edit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBTX Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 (edited) 1 hour ago, Triton said: Testing Edit: I seem to be able to edit Not receiving the option on mobile or desktop. Edit: curiously, the option reappeared for this post. Maybe just a bug. Ignore me. Edited August 17 by JBTX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 19 hours ago, mattyt36 said: Wrong, the new D pier was designed in no insignificant part to give UA additional international gate capacity (it should be obvious they have no other options to implement their "massive" growth plans on the international side at the peaks, which is when you want to add new international destinations to maximize connectivity) instead of building the 2008-era proposed FIS at Terminal B. They will be using it--just like they use D today, although I am sure to a higher degree. The fact that they don't use the opportunity to build a build-to-suit flagship club is, indeed, pathetic, given how crowded the existing clubs are. The closest club to those gates will be the already pathetically undersized C-North club. There were plans for a Star Alliance lounge at one point, but I'd think we'd have heard about it by now if it was still the plan. I am not saying they don't have growth plans at IAH because, as you say, they continue to pour money into facilities here and at least pay lip service to growing here. That said, in the last decade (i.e, from 2010 to 2019), UA grew 25% in seat capacity at DEN, 9% at ORD, and shrunk 4% at IAH. Since 2019, it has grown a further 19% in DEN and shrunk another 4% at IAH. Does not scream major growth plans to me. If you say they are sitting out waiting for the construction of D to be over, well, then we can only assume they'll sit out waiting for B to over, which will probably be another 5+ year redevelopment program. Chances are pretty decent there will be another major recession that will upend the existing growth plan and we will still be waiting. IMO IAH is a big hedge for them because they essentially control the facilities, unlike at DEN and ORD. No doubt United will make some use of the "new" Terminal D, just as they do now, but it is quite clear Terminal D will not be anything close to the core of their operation, or of their international operation. United will only have preferential rights to 3 gates on the west side of the new Terminal D West pier. Preferential rights; not exclusive rights. THREE gates, out of, I think, 23 or 24 gates in Terminal D. And only for 10 years. When the Terminal B rebuild is done, one imagines they will be able to move some purely domestic mainline operations from Terminal E over to Terminal B, thus making more room in E for International growth. The "C North" Club, of course, is right at the base of the new Terminal D West Pier, pretty perfectly-located for use by their terminal United's D-West passengers. I'm certain all United clubs at IAH are in line to be refurbished and possibly expanded. I guarantee there will be one or more new/expanded clubs in the refurbished/expanded Terminal B. It's a little . . . pathetic, if you will, 😉 to claim United is only giving "lip service" to growth plans. They have recently spent, and are spending, hundreds upon hundreds of millions of dollars upgrading and expanding their facilities at IAH. Probably wouldn't be doing all that if they didn't have real growth plans. Any chance you can share your sources for the seat capacity statistics? By the way, United plans to complete the Terminal B rebuild about 3 years from now, not 5+. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 It’s been reported on airliners.net that “Terminal B North is closing January 7, 2024 for demolition” Terminal B North is closing January 7, 2024 for demolition 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naviguessor Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 Can’t say I’ll miss it. Maybe the ‘“tunnel/bridges” a little bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.