Jump to content

Car Talk → 2022


Subdude

Recommended Posts

Wow...I would be upset if my dinky car got submerged - I can't even imagine driving something like that on the road let alone keeping it in a maximum security garage. I guess the point is that cars like that are enjoyable to own and drive? Not so much. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low-flying pelican prompts man to drive $2M Bugatti Veyron into La Marque lagoon

I dont know whether to laugh or cry !!

http://www.khou.com/news/pelican-bugatti-veyron-la-marque-lagoon-69851412.html

The man jerked the wheel, dropped his cell phone, and the car’s front tire left the frontage road and entered a muddy patch, which foiled his attempt to maneuver away from the lagoon.

I think I see the problem here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2010 E Class Convertible, with odd paint job:

EClass2.jpg

EConvertible.jpg

Buick considering Regal Wagon?

I rode in an E-class coupe this weekend. They call it an E-class coupe, but it's closer to the C-class than the E-class.

For those who don't know the history, the E-class coupe was replaced by the CLK-class in 1996. The CLK looked similar to the E-class, but wasn't on the same chassis. Previous to the CLK's introduction, coupes, sedans and wagons were all built on the same chassis. This E-class coupe is not built on the same chassis as the sedan and upcoming wagon, it's still a CLK but with a name change to make MB's naming nomenclature easier to understand. Gone are the days when their US lineup was just simply the 300D/CD/TD, 300SD, 380SL, 380SE/SEL and 500SEL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rode in an E-class coupe this weekend. They call it an E-class coupe, but it's closer to the C-class than the E-class.

For those who don't know the history, the E-class coupe was replaced by the CLK-class in 1996. The CLK looked similar to the E-class, but wasn't on the same chassis. Previous to the CLK's introduction, coupes, sedans and wagons were all built on the same chassis. This E-class coupe is not built on the same chassis as the sedan and upcoming wagon, it's still a CLK but with a name change to make MB's naming nomenclature easier to understand. Gone are the days when their US lineup was just simply the 300D/CD/TD, 300SD, 380SL, 380SE/SEL and 500SEL.

There is a the CLK and the CLS. I dont own an MB so I'm a little unsure where those fit in their lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely like the S60, but I'm not a fan of the Jetta. The tail is attractive, but I don't like the front end, at least compared to the outgoing one. Too generic. Wonder if the new Passat replacement will be as bland?

I think Volkswagen (and Toyota) both feel that bland is what generally sells, so they try to design cars that don't stick out too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the Charger is an improvement, but it's still not anything I would want to drive.

I've never been a fan of the latter-day Charger, but after having ridden in a coworker's SRT-8, I can say that 425 horsepower goes quite a ways toward mitigating its styling shortcomings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check it out, its VW Passat replacement. VW already released 2 skecthes of the unamed car, so someone came up with a render for it. Expect to see the car on the road in late 2011.

Render:

2011_MysteryVW.jpg

Sketch:

2011_VWSketch.jpg

Thoughts?

Something about that rendering reminds me of the Chevy Volt.

production-chevy-volt_021.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check it out, its VW Passat replacement. VW already released 2 skecthes of the unamed car, so someone came up with a render for it. Expect to see the car on the road in late 2011.

Render:

2011_MysteryVW.jpg

Sketch:

2011_VWSketch.jpg

Thoughts?

Incredible. It still has 4 wheels, 4 doors, engine up front. Like every sedan ever created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it. Good proportions, and it seems nice and restrained and VW-like, as compared to the more overwrought and busy designs that are common now (eg Honda Accord). It doesn't leap out at you, but it avoids the styling cliches and looks like it would age well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even style-wise.

It's just the same old junk, different decade.

I had one of these, a 1992 Premiere. It was a comfortable car. The V6 had eccellent acceleration and handled really well. It was fun to drive. The only problem was the electronics. Since it had a Renault engine, shared with Volvo I was told, the home town mechanics could not figure out why I kept going through alternators. Eventually it left my wife and family stranded out on Highway 77 south of Victoria. I had to have her towed to Victoria and nobody there could figure it out either. I had to get rid of her.

The car I mean.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2011 Kia VG (Or Cadenza) looks not too bad...

Its official name is Candenza, it will replace the Amanti.

2011-Kia-Cadenza-18.jpg

2011-Kia-Cadenza-10.jpg

2011-Kia-Cadenza-14.jpg

The all-new Cadenza sedan was officially launched in Korea today where it will go on sale under the name K7. The 4,965 mm (195.5'') long Cadenza will take over the role of Kia's flagship sedan from the 10-year old Opirus, also called Amanti in some markets. Designed under the guidance of former Audi design chief Peter Schreyer, the Cadenza is the production version of the KND-5 concept model shown in Seoul earlier this year.

Kia said that the new Cadenza will be offered with a total of three gasoline engines ranging from 165HP to 295HP for the 3.5 liter V6, with all models featuring front-wheel drive and a new six-speed automatic transmission. The Hyundai - Kia Group's new 201HP 2.4-liter four-cylinder gasoline engine with direct injection gasoline should be among the choices.

According to the Korean automaker, the Cadenza is scheduled to go on sale in most international markets, including North America and Europe, in January 2010.

http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2009/11/2011-kia-cadenza-high-res-photo-gallery.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is but, it looks a little to much like the 7-Series for me.

i don't think that is a bad thing, as the current 7-series is pretty attractive. However, I don't like the blunt front end. I know it is to meet pedestrian safety rules, but I just don't think it fits a car of this size (looks better on the 7).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had one of these, a 1992 Premiere. It was a comfortable car. The V6 had excellent acceleration and handled really well. It was fun to drive. The only problem was the electronics. Since it had a Renault engine, shared with Volvo I was told, the home town mechanics could not figure out why I kept going through alternators. Eventually it left my wife and family stranded out on Highway 77 south of Victoria. I had to have her towed to Victoria and nobody there could figure it out either. I had to get rid of her.

The car I mean.

Our family bought one of these new - the 1989 model. It had a 150 hp Mitsubishi (I thought, but not apparently) V-6. And it was decent. 7/70 warranty. This was the "Last Rambler." AMC bought/partnered with Renault on the design of the car, taking design ques from Volvo (headrests/body style)... and then Chrysler bought AMC... and then rebranded the "AMC Premiere" as the "Eagle Premiere" in 1987/88. It was built in Ontario at fairly advanced factory - for the day. It was the last car AMC attempted to put its name on.

The car had what was called "ground switching" electronics. Most electrical systems always have the ground/neutral connected at all times - and switch the hot (on and off).

In the Eagle Premiere... the hot side of the circuit was always connected... it was the ground side that switched on and off.

Backwards.

Needless to say, we had issues with the electrical, as well as the transmission. And one time.. at a red light the car would not move forward. I had to push it through the intersection.... and then drive it home in reverse (on side streets) for that last mile to the house. I never drove it again.

I saw an ad once: "For sale. 1988 Eagle Premiere. $2000 worth of repairs. Asking $2001 OBO."

Our family should have bought the Maxima. But Chrysler cut us a deal that was just too good to refuse...

Edited by BryanS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, look at it in black!!! biggrin.gif Never new a Kia can look this good. I want one.

kia-cadenza-spy-10.jpg

I know the former Audi design chief moved over to Kia, and that he is responsible for these new hot designs we are seeing, but I guess I'm surprised at just how blantant Kia is in copying the look we see on new Audis. Same guy, yeah, but isn't there some sort of design look-and-feel that becomes the property of the company the designer works for? I guess they can argue they are merely taking "design cues" from Audi, but geez those taillights could have literally come off an A4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the former Audi design chief moved over to Kia, and that he is responsible for these new hot designs we are seeing, but I guess I'm surprised at just how blantant Kia is in copying the look we see on new Audis. Same guy, yeah, but isn't there some sort of design look-and-feel that becomes the property of the company the designer works for? I guess they can argue they are merely taking "design cues" from Audi, but geez those taillights could have literally come off an A4.

I would'nt call it copying since the Audi design chief moved to Kia, and only the rear resembles Audi. They almost, literally ripped the taillights off the A4. I don't see any other Audi resemblance on Kia's other vehicles.

2010 A4 Rear

audi_100232794_m.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to Car Talk → 2022

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...