Triton Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 That can't be the final design, can it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saddleman Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Dollars to doughnuts, the whole exterior is glass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 It does look like it's rotating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 It does look like it's rotating. now, dude. Relax. It's just an LSD flashback. sit down and take another toke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I've been thinking it since I first saw it. And now I'm just going to say it. It's fugly!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmancuso Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 i like it. they should put it on corner of yorktown and westheimer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolie Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 They should put this on the Interfaith Ministries lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 It's planned to go up at 524 Westheimer. That's the southside of the street near the intersection of Whitney. Pre-sales will be starting shortly. I've heard they expect some neighborhood reservations about the height (24 floors overlooking Cortlandt Place) but that the developer says he is committed to the project and will just move locations if this one doesn't work out. Frankly, I hope it works. It's been awhile since a Houston project has pushed the limits and this one will certainly get people to react. I like buildings that make people think about architecture and how it truly does affect daily life in the city. Let the discourse begin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highway6 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 It's planned to go up at 524 Westheimer. That's the southside of the street near the intersection of Whitney. According to HCAD, 524 Westheimer is on the North side of the street and closer to Stanford. The owner of 524, also owns the two adjacent properties, 520 and 528 Westheimer. Also as a sidenote.. the new shapes / lines function on Gmaps is cool, but pretty useless if when linking to the map, it doesn't maintain the created shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesternGulf Posted April 19, 2007 Author Share Posted April 19, 2007 Google is criminally outdated. Here is a more updated photo of the area. Indika to the right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister X Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Frankly, I hope it works. It's been awhile since a Houston project has pushed the limits and this one will certainly get people to react. I like buildings that make people think about architecture and how it truly does affect daily life in the city. Let the discourse begin!Great news and well said.I really like this tower. Although, it does seem like an odd location. It will be totally unique in it's surroundings. I expect some of the neighbors will pitch a fit as usual. But maybe not - at least it's going in the most liberal, and open minded neighborhood in Houston. Where the untraditional have a little more freedom to stick out.I hope it brings some friends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I like it being closer to Downtown, I'm glad Houston is seeing atleast some good architecture in all these recent projects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Bummer. I was hoping it was the Southside of the street and I was really hoping it would replace that god-awful strip center that went up over the last few years. That surface parking lot is a definite eyesore and totally breaks the streetscape.I too like that it is so close to midtown/downtown. I'd prefer it if it were close to midtown (maybe on Elgin) but I wont complain too much. It beats trying to put it on a side street somewhere (like the Robinhood). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgreco Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 it looks early in stages if that. I would hope they add some balconies. Also some green space would be nice, the building in dubai did a pretty cool job with the green space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 it looks early in stages if that. I would hope they add some balconies. Also some green space would be nice, the building in dubai did a pretty cool job with the green space.I personally like the building as-is, but then that's only because I only have to drive by it, not live in it. If I lived there, I'd want one or more balconies. Although it'd ruin a lot of the aesthetic considerations, most buyers at this price point are really less concerned with outward appearance than interior comfort, so they might run into a wall with that issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saddleman Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Balconies would just ____ up the whole look of the building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Yeah I don't see any room for balconies in this design - it's supposed to be a clean, geometric sort of design. But maybe there could be a rooftop garden or something, like you see in places like NYC? That would be cool! Although it would probably would not be big enough for everybody.Just out of curiosity - how many residential buildings in Houston lack balconies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesternGulf Posted April 20, 2007 Author Share Posted April 20, 2007 Only historical condo buildings in downtown. Some have balconies on their backwalls though such as Commerce Towers and Bayou Lofts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Balconies would just ____ up the whole look of the building.Concur. Nevertheless, they may find it to be a competitive disadvantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdbaker Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Yeah I don't see any room for balconies in this design - it's supposed to be a clean, geometric sort of design. But maybe there could be a rooftop garden or something, like you see in places like NYC? That would be cool! Although it would probably would not be big enough for everybody.Just out of curiosity - how many residential buildings in Houston lack balconies?The Beaconsfield doesn't have balconies, but makes up for it with large windows that open on three sides. Like the other poster said, a significant number of downtown lofts do not have balconies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nate Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 The Four Leaf Towers do not have balconies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProHouston Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Balconies would just ____ up the whole look of the building.I'm not saying that this building should have balconies, it would take away from the design. However, if I were in the market for a high rise condo, I wouldn't buy a unit without a balcony. That's one of the biggest reasons to be in a high rise, to walk out on the balcony and have a view.I think this design should be for a commercial building, not residential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saddleman Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 It probably would better as an office building design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdbaker Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 I'm not saying that this building should have balconies, it would take away from the design. However, if I were in the market for a high rise condo, I wouldn't buy a unit without a balcony. That's one of the biggest reasons to be in a high rise, to walk out on the balcony and have a view.I think this design should be for a commercial building, not residential.Have you ever lived in building with a balcony? They're very overrated. Balconies offer zero privacy and they obstruct your view, which is the real reason to live in a highrise. If you want fresh air open a window or go for a walk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiRiseObserver Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Have you ever lived in building with a balcony? They're very overrated. Balconies offer zero privacy and they obstruct your view, which is the real reason to live in a highrise. If you want fresh air open a window or go for a walk. I live in a building with balconies. Most buildings do not have continuous balconies, therefore, in most buildings the balcony obstructs only some views, and well designed balconies are not an obstruction IMHO. Opening windows for fresh air is a bad idea in most hi-rise buildings -- interferes with pressurization and HVAC balances in the building. I won't go into details, but I enjoy entertaining and certain pleasures on my balcony that are not an option on a walk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmainguy Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 There's a market for both...look at Four Leaf.Besides, the illustration is VERY preliminary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
713 To 214 Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 This proposed structure reminds be of a 52 story project being proposed for DT Dallas.Corrigan Towerhttp://forum.dallasmetropolis.com/showthre...4941&page=2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trae Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 That things looks just as horrid as that Dubai tower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 That things looks just as horrid as that Dubai tower. I have to agree. However, I personally doubt that this is the final design for the tower. And even if it is the final design, it's better to get something than nothing at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted April 22, 2007 Share Posted April 22, 2007 Places with few or no balconies;Four Leaf TowersThe Warwick1400 HermannThe Park LaneThe SpiresMuseum TowerSeven RiverwayLofts on Post Oak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.