Jump to content

Discovery Tower


Ethanra

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, it does.

Just seeing something like that makes people think, and makes people talk about energy conservations, and plus looks cool and makes that building more than just another glass box. I'm sure that's what the architects had in mind since it was pretty obvious from the start that it wasn't going to be generating a significant amount of power. I think it's different, and I really like it.

Edited by Jax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Razor’s 19 KW wind turbines use 5 blades instead of 3 to cut down on noise pollution. The building is expected to generate 50 MWh of electricity a year." CleanTechna.com

It's a start.

Found this.

WindGenerator_PowerMax2kw_d.jpg

WindGenerator_2kW48V_parts_web.jpg

You too can own a 2 KW wind turbine. Want to match the energy production of Hess Tower? Buy ten! Pay less than $20k. Want to attract attention to your douchey largess? Defeat the purpose by installing them in a boxy framework of steel and glass that's lit up at night (!) and costs millions of dollars.

It's a travesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did he just call me "humanistic sludge"? I think The Niche is in line to take over Musicman's place on HAIF which makes me less inclined to post here as much.

The thing that makes this building interesting is that it isn't just pure aesthetics like a spire, or a lighted top. What makes it interesting is that it is aesthetically interesting and functional. You can think of it as a kinetic sculpture if you want, but it is also a small scale technology demonstration that gives people something to talk about and sets this building apart from the others. I am sure if they hadn't put turbines on top they would have spent money on something purely aesthetic and lit it up anyways.

I hope that someday you live in your nondescript metallic warehouse and your spite for me inspires you to save a lot of energy, but please consider being less condescending while you're at it.

Edited by Jax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did he just call me "humanistic sludge"? I think The Niche is in line to take over Musicman's place on HAIF which makes me less inclined to post here as much.

The thing that makes this building interesting is that it isn't just pure aesthetics like a spire, or a lighted top. What makes it interesting is that it is aesthetically interesting and functional. You can think of it as a kinetic sculpture if you want, but it is also a small scale technology demonstration that gives people something to talk about and sets this building apart from the others. I am sure if they hadn't put turbines on top they would have spent money on something purely aesthetic and lit it up anyways.

I hope that someday you live in your nondescript metallic warehouse and your spite for me inspires you to save a lot of energy, but please consider being less condescending while you're at it.

Don't stop posting. Nobody cares what Niche thinks. If it wasn't for people like you, posting current photos of Houston on a regular basis , this website would be nothing but a bunch of know-nothing-know-it-alls typing useless gibberish and insignificant opinions all day. Don't take Niche's comments too seriously - I assure you no one else does. A photo is worth a thousand words. Anonymous internet opinions are worthless (except for mine, of coarse). Jax is a useful contributor to this website. Niche is not.

Edited by Mister X
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jax- I appreciate your photos and comments on this forum. You bring an interesting perspective since you're not from Texas or the USA.

No sure why The Niche seems to have it out for you but he certainly does follow your posts with petty attacks.

It seems pretty stupid to talk about "aesthetic waste" on an architectural forum. Seems like all architectural elements worth talking about have some form of "aesthetic waste."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say that The Niche's constant antagonism makes me less inclined to post on this site...

DT turned out better than I expected. Makes a nice impression from the park... it looks modern and the turbines do add an aesthetic flare.

Too bad I can't say the same thing for the ugly and uninteresting Embassy Suites...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw them spinning once, it was definitely very cool looking. I like this building a lot.

I saw the turbines spinning in the wind today. It looked really cool from Midtown. Maybe it doesn't generate a lot of electricity, but it's eye catching and at least it's generating some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that makes this building interesting is that it isn't just pure aesthetics like a spire, or a lighted top. What makes it interesting is that it is aesthetically interesting and functional. You can think of it as a kinetic sculpture if you want, but it is also a small scale technology demonstration that gives people something to talk about and sets this building apart from the others. I am sure if they hadn't put turbines on top they would have spent money on something purely aesthetic and lit it up anyways.

I am now prepared to concede the the top is interesting. I've only seen it in action once--tonight--and it was enough to draw my highly-intoxicated eyes off of the stripes on the road and induce swerving in my lane.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing aesthetically wrong with them and I don't see where TheNiche ever said there was. They are technically dumb. It's a very bad spot for wind turbines to be placed and the money to put them there could have been used to build a more efficient power source somewhere else. The gullible and naive may think that they are something more than a publicity stunt and decoration. The last thing we need is for people to become more ignorant about energy production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing aesthetically wrong with them and I don't see where TheNiche ever said there was. They are technically dumb. It's a very bad spot for wind turbines to be placed and the money to put them there could have been used to build a more efficient power source somewhere else. The gullible and naive may think that they are something more than a publicity stunt and decoration. The last thing we need is for people to become more ignorant about energy production.

Edify us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing aesthetically wrong with them and I don't see where TheNiche ever said there was. They are technically dumb. It's a very bad spot for wind turbines to be placed and the money to put them there could have been used to build a more efficient power source somewhere else. The gullible and naive may think that they are something more than a publicity stunt and decoration. The last thing we need is for people to become more ignorant about energy production.

They could've created a foundation to buy poor people 400-watt residential turbines and that would've been a far more economical approach to being 'green', meaning that they could have simply saved money on the same effect or made the effect larger.

Either way, yeah. "Technically dumb."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anybody know how much more it cost to integrate turbines into the roof rather than just building a lighted crown or some other conventional aesthetic feature like that and then placing the turbines at ground level? I don't think placing them in back yards really makes sense unless you're going to elevate them higher than the surrounding structures though so that would add to the cost of doing it that way. The only problem is that would reduce the impact of the building, and don't forget that we're living in a capitalist society where corporations always want their buildings to stand out. I'd much rather see a building that stands out by doing something different than just another lighted crown, even if the utility of it isn't as good as I would like.

I'd rather see a skyscraper that generates all of it's power off the grid but that's not going to happen. I'm pretty happy that we ended up with something unconventional. And I like the fact that it makes people talk about using wind power.

Edited by Jax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could've created a foundation to buy poor people 400-watt residential turbines and that would've been a far more economical approach to being 'green', meaning that they could have simply saved money on the same effect or made the effect larger.

Either way, yeah. "Technically dumb."

Ahh...the usual HAIF move from "I love this building!" to picking it apart. I had the over/under at 20 pages for this thread, so I guess I lost my bet. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could've created a foundation to buy poor people 400-watt residential turbines and that would've been a far more economical approach to being 'green', meaning that they could have simply saved money on the same effect or made the effect larger.

Either way, yeah. "Technically dumb."

Since when is Tramell Crow in the 'business' of helping poor people? If you think about it, it was a pretty smart move. I mean, the entire building is leased out to an energy company that is primarily oil and gas. I wonder if Hines is kicking theirselves for not making the jaws on the monkey wrench building not open and close by the forces of nature.

I can see the turbines from where I sit and they don't appear to be spinning today. I have noticed before, though, that they are more noticeable when the air is thick with humidity or if it's even raining. I looks similar to a mirage, etc. If you stare at them too long, I believe that they have a hypnotizing effect. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In the future someone, not us!, will see a lot of buildings with Fan generated electricity. Things just may be so bad in available energy there won't be any choice but to use what you brought, and who knows in the future people may have to drastically cut back their use of electricity and the entire face of every city will not be lit as we now see it. Candle making may make a big come back, unless someone invents electricity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the future someone, not us!, will see a lot of buildings with Fan generated electricity. Things just may be so bad in available energy there won't be any choice but to use what you brought, and who knows in the future people may have to drastically cut back their use of electricity and the entire face of every city will not be lit as we now see it. Candle making may make a big come back, unless someone invents electricity.

Or hopefully, it will just make economic sense to make more buildings more energy efficient and new developments will incorporate more designs like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No ground floor retail is what I've been told. I always thought that would be a good place for a patio pub, but not gonna happen.

how whack is that? no retail, restaurant, nothing?

I don't get it, this is a perfect opportunity to do something great. That location is prime for some ground retail or restaurant development. Right across the street from the Park! Why can't these companys do that in downtown Houston?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denmark is leading the way in Turbine Powered Electricity Generation, they now have about 40 to 45 percent of their total electrical generation made from Turbines. South of El Paso about a hundred miles there are thousands of these generators erected along I10. When I drove to Nevada in 94 there were none, in 2005 I came back to Houston and was amazed when I saw these things at just early daylight in a light rain, they all had red beacons on top and the first thing that came to mind was Martians :P

This is Copenhagen Harbor, I animated it myself, kinda makes ya want to take a swim don't it... :)

2f04y6s.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Back to the ground floor retail issue, I heard the original plan was to lease out the ground floor as retail but then Hess leased out the whole building and they will now sublet the ground floor to retail of their choosing, when they choose to. Doubt there will be retail upon opening this summer, but hopefully sooner rather than later. My hopes for a nice pub/restaurant on that corner are not entirely dashed yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...