Jump to content

NRG Park Mixed-Use Development


SpaceCity

Recommended Posts

http://en.wikipedia.org/upload/0/04/Reliant_Park.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/upload/d/df/PictureofReliantStadium.JPG

Above & Beyond

Roof covers new ground by bringing unique elements into play

By DAVID BARRON

Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle

As you drive at night along the South Loop and gaze at newly built Reliant Stadium, you may think that you see one building that, in the words of its designer, twinkles like a giant jewel box amid Houston's skyline.

What you really see, in the orderly, mathematical world of David Manica and his colleagues at HOK Sports, is two projects -- the stadium, which is impressive in its own right, and the roof, which is unlike anything in the history of American sporting palaces.

Roofed stadiums are, of course, almost old hat in Houston. Reliant Stadium, after all, towers over the building that broke -- and redefined -- the mold, the Reliant Astrodome. From the upper regions of Reliant Stadium's north side, it is possible to see downtown Houston and the baseball complex now known as Minute Maid Park.

Reliant's roof, however, is unique in the small circle of retractable-roof stadiums.

It has two retractable panels, as opposed to three at SkyDome in Toronto and six at Bank One Ballpark in Phoenix. The panels retract in opposite directions, similar to the BOB's roof but unlike the two moving panels at Minute Maid and Safeco Field in Seattle, which travel in the same direction. Miller Park in Milwaukee also has two moving panels, but they retract in a fan-shaped pattern.

Manica's first challenge in designing what would become Reliant Stadium actually came back in the days when the NFL's return to Houston was little more than a pipe dream.

In 1997, the stadium-to-be was a decidedly different project. For one thing, the roof was fixed, not retractable.

"That was the initial design," he said. "But the tenant requirements between the football team and the rodeo were such that the rodeo would require the roof to be closed. They were not interested in being a part of an open-air facility. INS &

"Houston was competing with Los Angeles at the time to get the team, and there is no doubt that the NFL prefers an open-air stadium with natural grass. So the best way to solve that problem was to design the new building here with an operable roof."

Manica's first drawings of a roof that would open and close began in the summer in 1997 and proceeded in fits and starts for the next two years as Texans owner-to-be Bob McNair wooed and eventually won the rights to the NFL's 32nd franchise.

HOK's original plan for the roof called for an "accordion-style" roof -- one that, in visual terms, would simply "fold up and go away" when opened. That plan, Manica explained, would prevent the roof from "overpowering" the stadium by setting too heavily, in a design sense, over the rest of the building.

"But that started to present some interesting engineering complications and cost and maintenance worries," he said. "And so we moved away from the accordion to the simple roof panel."

To be exact, two roof panels -- each 240 feet long and 385 feet wide. From midfield, one panel slides to the north and one to the south along a set of tracks placed along the 967-foot long "super trusses" that frame the roof structure.

When the roof is fully retracted, the open space above the playing field is 350 feet wide by 500 feet long -- 175,000 square feet. Unlike Texas Stadium, which has trusses that span the open portion of its roof, the Reliant Stadium roof is completely open to the elements when the two panels are retracted.

And, unlike the roof at Minute Maid Park, which whether open or closed is easily the defining element of that stadium, the Reliant roof is just that -- a top that doesn't overwhelm everything beneath.

Smiley N. Pool / Chronicle

Reliant Stadium is completely open when two of the roof panels are retracted, a process that takes only seven minutes.

"We keep the visual weight of the roof down by not stacking panels, like they do with the roof at Minute Maid Park," Manica said.

The second unique element -- at least as it applies to retractable-roof stadiums in the United States -- is that the roof material is made of fabric. Specifically, a Teflon-coated, fiberglass fabric manufactured by Birdair Inc. of Amherst, N.Y.

"We wanted to have the feel of an open-air stadium, even with the roof closed," Manica said. "When you walk around the Astrodome, you walk through circular, dark concourses. We wanted to have more light with the comforts of climate control, and the fabric was an important part of that design."

Birdair fabrics were used in the United States for the Georgia Dome in Atlanta, the Metrodome in Minneapolis, the Edward Jones Dome in St. Louis and Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg, Fla. Elsewhere, the company installed fabric roofs on the Millennium Dome in London, Olympic Stadium in Rome, Hiroshima Stadium in Japan and Shanghai Stadium in China.

"We used a high-translucency version of the fabric, which requires a lot of special care to install as opposed to the standard fabric," said Clark Martens, project manager for Birdair. "It allows 24 percent to 25 percent of the outside light to get through. The Georgia Dome roof, by comparison, allows maybe 10 percent."

As with all projects, there are tradeoffs in using fabric, Manica said.

"Fabric is more expensive than using a hard roof surface of decking and membrane," he said. "However, we found that not needing the additional amount of structural steel to hold up the weight of the roof would offset the cost of the fabric. So we came up with the most cost-effective roof that could be designed for this building."

This particular element of architectural haute couture cost about $10 million. However, Martens said, it is engineered to carry full hurricane loads, including winds of more than 100 mph. Try that with your garden-variety Armani frock.

The fabric also creates a vaulted frame over the roof frame to help shed water and to "give a sense of space for those inside inside the seating bowl," Manica said. A series of 10 steel cables, each two inches in diameter and capable of exerting 200,000 pounds of pressure, secure the fabric to the roof structure and create the series of peaks and valleys.

"This is relatively new for the United States, but if you go to Europe, fabric roofs are much more of the norm," Martens said. "The next domed stadium that will be built in this country will be the football stadium in Phoenix, and that also will be fabric. We think it is a cost-competitive system, and it gives you a lot of nice attributes, such as that feel of natural daylight."

The job of making the roof panels and their giant fabric swatches move to and fro fell to Cyril Silberman, president of Uni-Systems Inc. of Minneapolis, who also designed the transport system at Minute Maid Park.

This system, however, is as different from Minute Maid's as football differs from baseball, Silberman said.

For one thing, the Reliant Stadium roof is lighter -- 3,000 tons, as opposed to 9,000 tons at Minute Maid, including the sliding glass wall that runs along Crawford Street. That difference made for some, as Silberman gingerly described it, challenging design problems.

"The Reliant roof could depart the stadium under a number of different circumstances if we didn't do something special with it," he said. "In winds of 50 mph from the right direction, in theory it could sail away if you didn't have a retention system. And you have 50 mph winds at least 10 times a year during thunderstorms.

"Consequently, this roof has a very complex electrical and mechanical system that measures the wind and keeps the roof gripped firmly on its rails and moves it with timers and sensors that make it absolutely impossible for the roof ever to get away."

Another challenge in designing the transport system, Silberman said, is that buildings are subject to lateral defractions.

In other words, they wiggle.

"To build the trusses strong enough so that they wouldn't have had any movement would have required 400 to 600 extra tons of steel and concrete," Silberman said. "But, by allowing this to be a semi-flexible structure, they saved a lot of money and complexities and erecting hazards."

The roof is designed to allow 21 inches of lateral wiggle room as the building expands and contracts. To cope with those changes, Uni-Systems installed what it calls a four-bar linkage system on the north roof panel that keeps the roof on track as the building breathes. The south edge of the roof is on a rigid series of transports engaged to a rail that does not allow movement.

"We only needed (the release mechanism) on one side," Silberman said. "The other side has to be rigid. Otherwise, the building could fall over sideways."

The roof track also has a series of what Silberman describes as hurricane hold-down clamps that are not present on any other transportable roof in the United States.

"It's like a series of giant scissors with teeth under the railroad track (on which the roof moves)," Silberman said. "There's enough clearance for the roof to move, but not enough for it to leave the track. When the roof comes to a stop, they clamp on tightly."

If you're concerned about leaks, don't be. When the roof panels come together, it activates a system of inflatable seals, powered by a system of six to eight 15-horsepower air blowers, to keep fans protected from the elements.

Silberman's transport system can close the roof in seven minutes, as opposed to 12 minutes for the one-way system at Minute Maid Park. He estimates the total cost of the roof, including the transport system, the fabric and the structural steel, at about $48 million.

http://images.chron.com/content/chronicle/special/02/reliant/img/opensky.jpg

Reliant Stadium is completely open when two of the roof panels are retracted, a process that takes only seven minutes.

http://images.chron.com/content/chronicle/special/02/reliant/img/rooftop.jpg

Even at night, it's clear that the Reliant's fiberglass roof shaped up to look very different from the fixed-glass one that covers the Reliant Astrodome.

http://images.chron.com/content/chronicle/special/02/reliant/img/roofrail.jpg

The retractable roof rides this rail when it is set in motion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

From today's Chronicle:

Recycle, fill in Astrodome

The Astrodome, like a lot of great monuments from the past, has served its purpose and should make way for progress.

The Dome is an eyesore. It is often hidden from public view by the selective use of camera angles.

The steel in the Dome could be recycled to build bridges or offshore platforms.

An auction could be held to recycle many of its components and to turn them into usable objects.

The big hole left after tearing it down could be filled in. It would provide some much-needed additional parking spaces.

DALE L. WOOD

Houston

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This person simply does has no appreciatation for a body of work when it comes to construction. if you're going to use that logic, then by all means, disassemble that tower in Paris that was supposed to only last for the duration of the world's fair!

Ricco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh yes, an even larger relatively treeless parking lot, muuuch less of an eyesore.

Not that I am for tearing down the dome, but if it were torn down that would add a huge amount of space. The entire parking lot could then be redone with landscaped islands throughout. It wouldn't happen, but oh well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Astrodome is a real pain in the neck.

It's no longer suitable for its intended purpose, and no one has come up with a convincing better use. And stadia are like roads or bridges or anything else people build; they require maintenance. Our tax dollars cover (at least I hope they do) the dreary need to fix leaks, retard corrosion and generally protect our investment. Eventually, we need to ask "is this in our best interest?".

I'd hate to see the Astrodome destroyed. I think of it as being like Paxton's Crystal Palace, a significant milestone in architecture. The 'dome helped put Houston on the map. It's audacious and beautiful and influential. When I was a kid, there were three structures being built that really captured my imagination; the St. Louis Arch, the World Trade Towers, and the Astrodome. I've been to two of the three (I've still never been to the Astrodome). People were awestruck; "An indoor, air-conditioned baseball stadium?" The future seemed possible.

Until...unless...someone comes up with a great proposal, and has the $$$ to back it up, the 'dome will remain a pain in the neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Astrodome, like a lot of great monuments from the past, has served its purpose and should make way for progress.

Yeah, like that awful Empire State Building, or how about all of Washington, D.C! It's so very outdated! At the very least, tear down the Capitol Building. That could be a parking lot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, like that awful Empire State Building, or how about all of Washington, D.C!  It's so very outdated!  At the very least, tear down the Capitol Building.  That could be a parking lot!

Those landmarks are (well not nyc) hundreds of years old... and serve a major purpose...

Why pay for such a huge structure that isn't being used, and throwing money out the window? If the Empire State building's leases ever got emptied (back then) I'm sure it would have been empolded... or if the Capitol moved from DC, what purpose would they serve? nothing... but they did, and thats why there still here today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I think it should go back to it's past glory and be a fighting Arena. I'm sure they could get George Foreman to back the idea, since he use to puch for events there. Still can promote college and highschool games as well as circus and fairs and bullfighting and non-rodeo riding events. Get a minor league baseball team in there. So much can be done with it. Can still host concerts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think that the rodeo can hold additional events there, different acts or whatever. It just needs a bit of renovation on the inside. hell, if The Garden in Boston has endured all these years, surely the Dome can still be used for a few more years.

Ricco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody ever see the Cadillac Ranch outside Amarillo?

Well, I have. We drove out of our way just to go by and see it. It is ugly. It is gaudy. But it was there, and I had never seen it, so I drove over just to see it because it was famous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody ever see the Cadillac Ranch outside Amarillo?

Well, I have. We drove out of our way just to go by and see it. It is ugly. It is gaudy. But it was there, and I had never seen it, so I drove over just to see it because it was famous.

While this is an interesting topic, please remember this thread is about the Dome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think that the rodeo can hold additional events there, different acts or whatever.  It just needs a bit of renovation on the inside.  hell, if The Garden in Boston has endured all these years, surely the Dome can still be used for a few more years.

Ricco

Do you mean the Boston Garden that was demolished in 1997... is that the Boston Garden you are referring to? ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL.

I was refering to Madison Square Garden. :) I was a little drowsy when I wrote that. :huh:

I am still very partial to their holding multiple events there during the Rodeo or maybe during some "Mega" events where they can counter program eachother. If you're not interested in what's going on in the stadium, just waltz over to the Dome. :)

Ricco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dbig, you missed the point. Visitors want to see the Dome, not because it is beautiful, but because it is The Astrodome. Most first-time visitors I have known said the two things they really wanted to see was NASA and The Astrodome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H2B, I see your point now.

I agree, the Astrodome is probably still more of a tourist attraction than Reliant Center will ever be. It's iconic.

Stanley Marsh 3's Cadillac Ranch is about 10 years younger than the Dome, and (from what pictures I've seen) is showing the ravages of time. This is perhaps acceptable for this particular work of art, but a decaying Dome cannot be a good thing. In Neil Young's words, "Rust Never Sleeps". According the the County, to maintain the Dome is very expensive, whether it's in use or not. I'd be perfectly happy if it were to remain purely for its visual presence; but even doing nothing with it is terribly expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Atlanta doesn't have a chance. After all the problems during the olympics and their traffic snarls (worse than Houston's as I've been told by Atlantians) I don't think they'll get it. I doubt Miami will get it "back-to-back" (I know, I know - there's a 2 year gap - you know what I mean..).

So that just leaves us & Tampa, which in my opinion is a tough one.. I can't seem to find a list of past superbowl hosts. Has Tampa hosted before? I could see the committee having a pity party for Tampa if they've never hosted. Although, in the past, they've selected New Orleans 9 times & Miami 8...So maybe Houston's a repeat - I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Glen

Here is the information you looked for: Superbowl History

:D

Ricco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...