Jump to content

arche_757

Full Member
  • Content Count

    1690
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

arche_757 last won the day on October 2 2014

arche_757 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

732 Excellent

About arche_757

  • Rank
    !

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Lurking about

Recent Profile Visitors

14280 profile views
  1. Money talks. No reason a developer couldn’t incorporate the Dillard’s into a high rise tower - Water Tower Place in Chicago is one example. It would make sense for the Galleria to expand east and tie into Dillard’s in some capacity here in the future.
  2. One can hope it’s more than just a Twin Peaks! That said, at what point do we over saturate the market demand for food halls? Ideally the site would eventually become home to a nice mixed use high rise (or two - including Dillard’s). Sadly I think that the market for something like that is unlikely at this time.
  3. Obviously we need to design with a clear mind when it comes to potential for weather. I think we need to design homes with greater resiliency for the weather - any weather.@
  4. I am curious what all of you feel are needed elements, and which are unnecessary elements of a suburban home in greater Houston circa 2030. How would that home differ from what it is today? What would you change about the house? yard? street? neighborhood? This is just an open discussion on the suburban home of the future. There is no right or wrong. Assume the following: Houston has continued to grow (9 - 9.5 million), weather is still a major concern, and the urban areas of town are booming..
  5. Hindsight tells us a little bit more open land would be very good... just say’n
  6. Kingwood and a few other areas were over developed (sadly) without regard to the 10,000 lbs gorilla staring them in the face: upstream flooding and river management, or lack thereof in event of flooding. This is the same for the areas near the Brazos in Fort Bend, and areas built in the flood pool(s) of Buffalo Bayou. It’s a shame. What’s even worse is that elevating structures another foot or two - at the time - probably wouldn’t have been that costly. Now it’s a BIG expense. Not saying that they wouldn’t have flooded otherwise during certain extreme events, but I’ll wager quite a few would have been fine. We need a regional flood authority, with regional control and -importantly- oversight of these yokel river authorities. This should be true moving forward state-wise... but I’m not going to hold my breath.
  7. Probably so. Would be somewhat separated from the rest of the campus, but perhaps a chance at a distinctive structure? Not that they are necessarily lacking. I imagine a high rise residential project will ultimately end up at that property... ? Which is good I suppose.
  8. You’re correct. That said, I believe Galveston’s intention in implementing the LDR was to define standards which would remove the potential for buildings like the San Luis or maybe even the convention center. They were trying to avoid having developers block entire blocks of low-rise residential, which is technically still possible - albeit much more complicated these days. Folks in Galveston *want* expect to have beachfront views from their scabbed on garage rooftop porches, even if the “structures” are 2-3 blocks north of the commercially zoned Seawall frontage. That and they’d reaaaly like to avoid any high rise development along most of the Seawall. There are too many Galvestonians that think they deserve some sort of grandfathered in exclusions for their immediate backyard. Which, as a homeowner myself I don’t necessarily blame them, but you have to weigh the risks when buying near (1-3 blocks) of a commercial zone. If Johnny Developer comes along and smacks down a 5-floor building on a piece of land which is zoned for such development - what should you expect?
  9. UH D should buy that land... They’ve probably looked at it, but the entity that owns it most likely wants $$$! Is Transwestern the owner, or just representing the owner?
  10. Doesn’t appear scaled correctly for a 58 floor tower. Look at the base. That said, if this IS the design: garbage.
  11. Particularly that 4-phases will be developed in the next 10 years!! 2.5 years each. Pretty aggressive, indeed.
  12. I must admit the quality of ideas in regard to development has drastically improved over the last 20 years. East River, Station Houston and TMC3 (among others), while different entirely in what they are - are the sort of forward thinking, large, transformative projects Houston was known for decades ago. Those 3 alone will greatly alter the landscape in town. This is an entire new district created in an area where these sort of projects wouldn’t have happened with the developers of the 90’s and early 00’s. At all. Midway has - in my opinion - clearly separated itself from anyone not named Hines in this town. Good for them. Better for us.
  13. I should have added prior to posting that it was a sort of running joke among the architects and engineers who worked on the project. Sarcasm is hard to decipher (and convey) over the interweb’s sometimes.
  14. I recall speaking to some folks who worked on the project and this was a common theme brought up. Probably was a VE item suggested by the GC before design went public! I’d have loved to be a fly on that wall.
  15. I thought I was one of the few! I’ve routinely said we’re at, or over 7,000,000 for the last several months. Pretty impressive! When I started college in 2001 we had about 4.1 million people here in town.
×
×
  • Create New...