Jump to content

ADCS

Full Member
  • Posts

    562
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ADCS

  1. Tens of millions of years have conspired to make the Texas Coastal Prairie ugly as sin and nigh-uninhabitable to pre-modern humans. It's also a paradise to countless other species. We've only got cities here because of physical geography, not ecology. Try as you might, what's aesthetically pleasing will only exist in pockets here. But that's OK - there are plenty of pretty places within a few hours drive. Quit picking on the ugly - it never did anything to you.
  2. The train station/UHD portion will be decommissioned as well. The new bridge will connect the Center St line to Hardy Yards.
  3. Yes, pretty much everything from 527 up to the I-10 interchange will be rebuilt.
  4. Oh, I'm not talking commuter - I'm talking a grade-separated rapid transit system. Since this is a long-term plan, and TCR is more likely, why not have it on the books?
  5. That's exactly what I was thinking when I saw they were opening the plan up to discussion again. And why settle there? Let's get heavy rail down Washington or Westheimer!
  6. Eh, the comment above was a bit overstated. The line parallel to Washington will stay pretty much intact, while the line on Winter St will be removed altogether as part of the I-45 reroute. There will be a new double-tracked bridge over White Oak Bayou.
  7. "Not even in the purview" - I didn't want to spend political capital on pushing it through.
  8. Hope so. Waugh's a good road diet candidate - that third lane is hardly needed.
  9. Red is existing, not new. The measures were taken specifically to impact Midtown and EaDo.
  10. Even better idea - see if Disney will help with the development. This is the sort of space they have a lot of experience with.
  11. So still no signature design elements for the DT Connector bridge over Buffalo Bayou? Kind of a shame, really. It would be cool to see an extradosed bridge here. Edit: and now I'm at Page 17 :-)
  12. If anything, it would make sense to actually have police walking beats in that area. Put more of 'em on bikes, too.
  13. Agreed - Westheimer and Washington are the two immediate corridors that come to mind if we were to commit to heavy rapid transit. You could link them using Travis Street, making a big U connecting the HSR station/NW Transit Center, Washington Corridor, Burnett TC, Downtown, Midtown, Montrose, Greenway, and Uptown, ending at the Hillcroft Transit Center. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say ridership would be feasible.
  14. See, that attitude is the problem - buses are like cars, but worse, so we should give them to the poor as a pittance. Not, we should develop a comprehensive public transit plan so everyone, not just the poor, can get around more efficiently and effectively. Buses in the absence of other modes of transit are horrible, making traffic worse (because of the constant stopping and starting, reducing overall traffic flow during peak periods), and offering less functionality than private autos (horribly wasteful) because of the lack of point-to-point connections. Buses as part of an overall system, on the other hand, are wonderful, because they can shuttle people in that last mile to and from the fixed-guideway modes that bypass the traffic problem altogether. The big issue with light rail as implemented so far in Houston is that you only get a bit of one advantage, and none of the other altogether.
  15. Thing about the High Line is that it is functional as the best and fastest way to get from Hudson Yards to Greenwich Village, on foot. Given the lack of direct subway connections, it's arguably the best way altogether. It's not beloved simply because it's pretty - it's both pretty and useful. Converting the Pierce would just get you from one side of Midtown to another. It wouldn't serve any real purpose that isn't already largely served by other modes, better.
  16. Mostly cost. Light rail is seen as cheaper, and it is already hard enough to get transit funding. As far as commuter, the existing rail lines around Houston are heavily trafficked. Instead of piggybacking on existing infrastructure, expansion would be needed on existing corridors (owner railroads would not like that), or construction on new/repurposed corridors (like the freeways). The latter option has generally been politically unpopular, seeing as it may take capacity away from the freeways, and irrespective of whether it would actually help traffic as a whole.
  17. My guess is that it has to do with ventilation requirements
  18. It's more than a project - it's a renovation on a Haussmannian scale. Triton: Removing previous discussion from this thread.
  19. I hope there's enough foresight that the new RR connection has ROW for triple- or quadruple-tracking to support future commuter service.
  20. It has been pushed back a couple of times. I'd guess 2025 at this point.
  21. Eh, closer to 2 miles from Ile de la Cite, and 5 from La Defense, but your general point is sound. Train stations have almost always been built at the outskirts of whatever the city was at the time of construction.
  22. As I've understood it, the whole project will be heavily subsidized by JR and the Japanese government as a proof of concept for Shinkansen technology in the US. If they can show that it will work between Houston and Dallas, then they can start selling to the more expensive, but potentially more lucrative routes in the Northeast Corridor and Midwest.
  23. TAHSR is loud, but they haven't been effective. Houston and DFW interests are too strongly behind the project, and you don't have airlines seeking to torpedo the thing like before. One thing to remember - all the top executives are high-level Republicans and donors, many of them Bush allies.
×
×
  • Create New...