Jump to content

fernz

Full Member
  • Posts

    619
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by fernz

  1. Yes, I agree taller buildings have stronger bones and take longer to build. That does not mean all office towers take longer to build than residential. The added time caused by the higher live loads is offset by the added amount in interior build out.

    Another obvious point to consider is floor plates. These days, a 25,000 sf plate is typical for office, whereas residential can get away with smaller floor plates.

    My point was that a blanket statement about use is not possible, there are too many variables.

    • Like 2
  2. There's no reason a residential tower, which has every unit fully finished out, should be faster to build than an office tower which is often delivered as shell space. Take a look at 2929 Wesayan and Sovereign as extreme examples. Skyhouses are an exemption, their developers have figured out a way to crank out McTowers very quickly. While they may not win Architectural awards, they are great for business given their speed to market - and I would bet most potential residents don't mind the exterior look at all.

  3. Huh?

    The new buildings are all pushed up against the street with retail on the sidewalk.

    Not to say that this looks perfect, but it does look relatively pedestrian-oriented, to the extent that is even possible in this context.

    The retail buildings are fronting a new street with what looks like a pitiful sidewalk, the open spaces look like suburban-type ponds instead of activity areas, and the center of the development has a new wide street..

    I know this is not the best "context" but the property fronts a park with lots of activity - and BTW the plan doesn't engage the park; but this is much better location than what City Center started out with (the intersection of two major freeways)

×
×
  • Create New...