Jump to content

crock

Full Member
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by crock

  1. 2 minutes ago, Houston19514 said:

    Show me where they said that.


    How about you show me where they've said that i45/i69 underground wouldn't be used as retention ponds during a major flood event.  When I asked TxDOT employees how people in the heights/Washington Corridor were supposed to get to the medical center during a major flood event without the pierce elevated they told me with a straight face we would use surface roads.  
     

  2. the single raised Bus lane is audible where I live, ~6 blocks south of i10@houston, and I cannot imagine what 5xing the amount of raised highway would do to the passive noise level of the First Ward. 

    the "this is for evacuations" is bullshit because 288 floods intentionally and every version of the i45 plan has them deciding to nullify any ability for i45/i59 through central houston to be functional during a storm, this portion of i10 would not have any traffic to move north/west by TxDot's already stated plans.  

    • Like 2
  3. 3 hours ago, Texasota said:

    These conversations always devolve into an absurd binary, as though wanting better transit means you think cars should be illegal or are never useful.

    Is a car useful if you want to go to Azurmendi or hop between towns in La Rioja? Sure. Nobody is saying cars are never useful, but they are *far* less efficient most of the time.


    wait, did you creep on my social media? 😂  Azurmendi was great, La Rioja was a ghost town after the past 2 years of no tourism dollars.   

    but, yes, i would love more transit options, and I'm still extremely pissed the i10 BRT line isn't going to have a First Ward stop.   


     

  4. 52 minutes ago, Texasota said:

    I just... you highway apologist weirdos have been to other countries right? 

    The independence offered by a car is often an illusion.

    And yeah, I realize we can never hope to have the advanced transit network of a wealthy, hyper-advanced, futuristic country like *checks notes* Spain, but that doesn't say anything about the inherent value of transit. It just says a lot about how deeply broken and backward our ability to build infrastructure has become.

     

    I'm not a highway apologist, but I did just spend 10 days in Spain, in a rental car, going to dozens of restaurants/museums/churches/hotels/scenic areas inaccessible by trains.  The independence offered was very very real. 

    • Like 1
  5. 2 hours ago, clutchcity94 said:

    Exactly. St. Augustine will be closer to $400-$500.


    the design and size of this hotel suggests it should be closer to the price point of The Carpenter in Austin, which is 200-400. 



    and to repeat, none of the hotels y'all suggested are ones I could in good conscience recommend to other millennial travellers.  The Heights House is a trashy uncool embarrassment, and the others are very much expense account/business traveler-driven.   

     

    • Like 2
    • Haha 3
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
  6. 18 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said:

    There are a ton of nice hotels to recommend to out of towners


    There are literally no boutique hotels to recommend to out of towners.   Do we have lots of nice business traveler-oriented hotels? yes.  that's an extremely different aesthetic/vibe than something like a bunkhouse or ace or McMenamins 

×
×
  • Create New...