So, I went to last nights Houston meeting. I unfortunately didn't get to attend much of the open house before the short presentation and had to leave before the public statement time was over so I did not get to ask TCR as many questions as I wanted. The meetings were strickly to go over and get input on the EIS, however there was some good information on how that works as well as possible stations. I didn't take pictures of the visuals because almost everything was from the dallashoustonhsr.com site. First off, I was somewhat disappointed to hear that currently there are no plans to have more than one station per city. In other words the 3 Dallas stations and the different Houston stations based on route selection are simply alternitives. This was dissapointing to me because it almost guarantees that there will not be a downtown station since the "last mile cost" and available land are considerations. The one encouraging other side of this is that the connectivity to other forms of transit is a factor in the decision of where to place the stations so at the least there should be the ability to get to the downtown areas quickly and cheaply from whatever locations are chosen for stations. Also, this was the first that I heard of an intermediate station. This was being discussed as a near certainty, and its location was in Ciro between B/CS and Huntsville. As an Aggie, this is exciting because CS already has a pretty extensive bus system and I suspect that they would run a route that corresponded with the train schedule during most of the day. This also opens up the use of this for a pretty strong commuter base in that area. The major concern that came of the meeting was from land owners in the rural areas was this "cutting their property and/or roads in half" which is simply a vast overstatement, as this was a larger concern if the BANSF route was chosen. It can take some of the land but I don't see how expanding an EXISTING ROW could possibly isolate a portion of someones property that is not already isolated. Can anyone with this perspective help me out here? Regaurdless it seems that TCR, TxDOT, and the FRA (the latter two are the ones actually doing the EIS and choosing the routes and possible locations apparently which surprised me) have a good system for inputting the concerns and desires of the public, but have been horrible in executing the information flow. I, like most of you have been constatnly following this issue for years, but to most people the first they heard (if at all) of this being a real possibility was a little blurb on the chronicles website about the route finalist. Even then I don't think it mentioned the meeting series. Anyone else go last night see anything different?