editor

You are correct — The problem isn't that the forum couldn't have been rolled back to restore all of Crockpot's posts. The problem is that if that was done, it would have removed all of the posts made by people after his were removed. So restoring the posts of one person would have deleted the posts of hundreds of other people. It was an easy choice.

Crockpot is incorrect. There are backups of the forum. Do not assume Crockpot is correct in stating that there aren't. He is not an administrator and has no knowledge of how the forum works. Also, hyperbole like "unacceptable" and "incompetent" is neither helpful, nor welcome. I was very active in Usenet days. Usenet was resilient because it was a network of hundreds of thousands of computers each copying each other's content. HAIF is one server, not hundreds of thousands of servers. This is incorrect. Also you have no knowledge of the workings of HAIF and should refrain from posting as if you do. There is not. I contacted the company which makes the software, and this is not an option.

I've stated this elsewhere, but the message has failed to reach the right ears, so I will state once again: There is no official naming convention for thread titles. Yes, other fora have rules about that sort of thing. We do not. Everybody knows where Chase Tower is. We don't need to append its address to the title of a thread about the building. If you want to put a bunch of information about a building in the title of a thread that you start, fine, do so. Do not pester the mods and others to change titles to suit your personal constraints. @CrockpotandGravel

The problem is that the system didn't mark him a spammer automatically, a human did. So therein lies the problem. I put a trouble ticket in with the company that makes the HAIF software and was told that once a message is marked spam, it's gone forever. This is unfortunate, but there's nothing much that can be done about it now. I have e-mailed Urbannizer and explained the situation. I told him he is welcome to continue posting on HAIF, but if he doesn't want to, I understand that.

I don't ordinarily post publicly about individual users, but I don't want people to wonder what's going on and not have information. A couple of days ago, Crockpotandgravel was banned. Actually, he was flagged as a spammer. I'm not sure why this happened, but I'm looking into it. The reason I mention it here is that he was a prolific poster, and being marked a spammer caused the system to remove all of his posts. As you can imagine, with 7,000+ posts to his name, this is causing some continuity issues in various threads. I've reversed the ban, and am trying to figure out a way to recover his content.

Done!

Hi everyone. Sorry I didn't post about the updates I've been doing lately, but it's been mostly behind-the-scenes things. Lots of security things, and some anti-spam measures. You may have noticed the forum was unavailable for about 10 minutes today. That was part of this. Here's the highlights: Added support for [Emoji 11](https://emojipedia.org/emoji-11.0/) emojis Fixed an issue where the inbox list may be stuck showing a spinner when canceling a search in the personal messenger. Fixed an issue where cover photos might disappear shortly after displaying Fixed a layout issue with the mobile pagination buttons Fixed broken login form Fixed an issue with Flickr video embeds showing as photos Fixed an issue with notifications not showing as unread Disabled Grammarly from checking editor fields to prevent Grammarly from breaking HTML and causing broken posts Disabled preloading of notification sound to speed up initial page load Fixed an issue where recurring events may show on the wrong day in Calendar Added back the ability to search personal messages by recipient and sender name, and removed the 365 day limit on results Fixed an issue where the mobile keyboard would not be hidden after submitting the search form As always, I'm tinkering with this and that in the background, so weirdness happens. I usually work on HAIF around 4pm, so if something looks screwy about that time of the day, it's probably me pushing buttons.

I'm not sure the forum software if capable of something like that, but it can certainly be accomplished manually by myself or one of the moderators. It would have to be done by myself or a moderator anyway; it wouldn't make sense to let everyone make changes like that. If there is a topic that you think needs an [Under Construction] or [Complete] or some similar tag, it's best to e-mail me about it. You might think that a PM would be best, but for my workflow, an e-mail will get the quickest response. As for having a boilerplate with statistics about a building or project at the head of a thread, that might be accomplished by the pinning of messages. I'll look into it.

While I agree that wider sidewalks are better, it's possible that there is a reason for the focus on landscaping instead of walkability. There are studies that show landscaped sidewalks actually slow down the average speed of traffic on a street ("street calming" they call it). If this project is headed up by a transportation agency instead of a community improvement group, then that could be the reason for the focus on landscaping instead of pedestrian-level amenities. Or I could be smoking the crack waffles again. That's also possible.

My preference is that it would be something like Common Name [- Development] (address) — status Example: Frobozz Tower - Zorktown Acres (42 White Mailbox Dr) — Under construction Example: Frotz Building (10704 Aragain Falls Rd) — Topped out If you guys want to take that and run with it, that's fine by me. But in no way is this an edict. I'd rather people do what makes sense for the building. The most important part is to communicate, and help people find what they need.

There are five more levels.

Here's a screenshot from February, 2002

The heritage of HAIF goes back to a web site I built in 1997. I had the kind of career where I'd move to a new city every six month to a year, and I enjoyed taking pictures of the building in each city I visited along the way. I put those photographs on a web site so my friends around the country could see them. This was when most people were just migrating from AOL to the actual internet. People would e-mail me questions about the buildings, and I'd add the replies and other facts to the various building pages. My friends would share the web link with their friends, and since there weren't many web sites on the internet at the time, it became popular. In 1999 I moved to Houston and started taking photos. By 2001 I had quite a few photographs, so I made a standalone Houston version of the site at houstonarchitecture.info. It launched January 15, 2002. Posting information to each building was very cumbersome at the time (this was when most web sites were crafted with plain text editors, and Dreamweaver was outside the budget of the majority of people). So I installed a piece of forum software on the site, and it became known as HAIF — the HoustonArchitecture.Info Forum. After I set up HAIF my personal life became busy, and I really only had time to add new photos to the main site, and didn't pay much attention to the forum. A year or so later I remembered that I'd set up the forum, and since I didn't use it, I logged in so I could shut it down. I expected the forum to be empty, just as I left it. Instead, there were hundreds of Houstonians and thousands of messages flying back and forth. HAIF grew completely organically, in much the same way as new life springs from the cheese you forgot in the back of the refrigerator. The rest is local history.

Hines sent this over today, so I thought I'd share it with the group. ----- 609 Main at Texas Opens New Bike Storage Facility The Bike Vault ready for Bike to Work Day MAY 15, 2019 (HOUSTON) – Hines, the international real estate firm, announced today the opening of a new tenant amenity at 609 Main at Texas, a 48-story, 1,073,075-square-foot office tower in downtown Houston. The new well-appointed indoor bike storage facility—called The Bike Vault—is a secured, conditioned bike storage area accessible directly from the garage with a building access badge. It has parking for up to 32 bicycles, changing facilities, storage lockers, bike repair stations, free refreshments and towel service. In addition, 609 Main at Texas will also be offering a Parcel Pending location directly adjacent to The Bike Vault, where tenants can have personal packages delivered to secured lockers in the building, including refrigerated lockers for food and grocery deliveries. The grand opening of The Bike Vault will take place on Friday, May 17 at 8:00 A.M., just in time for the Houston 2019 Bike to Work Day. Bike to Work Day, part of Bike Month, represents a unified day of celebration across the United States where the nation comes together to celebrate the bicycle – as a mode of transportation, a fun way to explore your city, get to work or just get around your neighborhoods in the town you call home. Hines Managing Director Philip Croker said, “As our tenants continue to look to alternative forms of transportation, combined with the initiatives of groups such as BikeHouston to provide more access to high quality bike lanes and trails, we are excited to provide an improved experience for these riders at the most amenity-rich, technologically advanced building in Texas.” Designed by the internationally recognized architectural firm Pickard Chilton, 609 Main at Texas’ north and south façade extend skyward, culminating in a dramatic diagonal crown, creating a new, highly visible downtown landmark. Amenities at the vertically integrated campus include a "hotel-style" lobby with a café and spaces for networking; a 7,000-square-foot high-performance fitness center and 8,000-square-foot conference center; full-height windows allowing for an abundance of natural light throughout the building; a sophisticated underfloor HVAC system; and private roof gardens in select tenant spaces. 609 Main at Texas stands at 86 percent leased. Notable tenants include EnVen Energy, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Orrick, Hogan Lovells, McKinsey & Company, PNC, Russell Reynolds Associates, Royal Bank of Canada, White and Case LLP, Goldman Sachs, and United Airlines. In addition, there are several transactions in progress which will bring the building to 94 percent leased. Hines is a privately owned global real estate investment firm founded in 1957 with a presence in 214 cities in 24 countries. Hines has approximately $120.6 billion of assets under management, including $66.5 billion for which Hines provides fiduciary investment management services, and $54.1 billion for which Hines provides third-party property-level services. The firm has 128 developments currently underway around the world. Historically, Hines has developed, redeveloped or acquired 1,348 properties, totaling over 444 million square feet. The firm’s current property and asset management portfolio includes 512 properties, representing over 223 million square feet. With extensive experience in investments across the risk spectrum and all property types, and a pioneering commitment to sustainability, Hines is one of the largest and most-respected real estate organizations in the world. Visit www.hines.com for more information.

This should be fixed now. Finger's crossed! Should be fixed now. HAIF e-mail is now bunged through an outside company that can handle Google's shenanigans.

Since this is a bigger problem than I realized, I've gone nuclear and I'm now paying for an e-mail account at a GMail competitor. One that has a massive staff to counter Google's tricks, and one that still respects its users privacy and internet standards. I've done a couple of tests and it all seems to work now. People should be able to get their verification e-mails. If you know of anyone who is having trouble, please as them to try again. Also please let any discussion threads in other fora know that this should be fixed and it would be great if they'd try again. Let everyone know that if they still have problems, they can contact me directly at editor@houstonarchitecture.com, and I'll take care of it personally.

This is largely an e-mail delivery issue. It affects mostly people with Gmail accounts, and is affecting thousands of web sites right now. It's a big topic of discussion in the sysop fora I read. Google, in its own interest, is dropping inbound email messages, apparently at random. A server can be perfectly configured, have been sending e-mail for a decade or more, and be on no black lists, and yet Google will silently discard the message. It doesn't mark it spam for the user to find, or send an error to the sender or sending server stating that it's refused. It all just disappears. This is in Google's interest because we end up in the situation we have today where people just want their e-mail. They, naturally, say "Well, I have no problems getting message on Gmail. You should switch to Gmail, too!" This pressure is causing people and companies to start moving to Gmail, which is not in the best interest of their users; only Google's. It's just one of about a dozen things Google has done in the last 15 months to make the web a worse place to be. The whole web is headed back to AOL days when people didn't know the difference between AOL and the internet. Except this time people think Google is the internet. I'm still tinkering, trying to figure out what can be done, and seeing what results other people's experiments are yielding. But it's a corporate decision at Google to break the established standards and do its own thing. I know registrations are working because I check them every few days. When I checked about 10 minutes ago, the only ones left hanging were from people on GMail. So for those, I'm checking the registration IP address and approving the accounts if the connection looks legit. Sorry for the inconvenience. It's something bad happening to the internet right now. I'll keep pushing buttons and see what happens.

Hi HAIFers, I've been doing work mostly behind-the-scenes lately. But since today I reorganized some of the fora, I thought it worth mentioning. With Houston's rapid geographic expansion, the old neighborhood categories weren't working anymore. So for now I've put this together: - Inside the Loop: Discussions about places inside the 610 loop. - Outside the Loop: Discussions about places outside the 610 loop, but within the Grand Parkway. - Houston Metro - Discussions about places outside the Grand Parkway, but still within the Houston metropolitan area. - Farther Afield - Places outside the Houston metropolitan area. I consider this a temporary fix while we work out something better. The reason I consider it temporary is because while at first glance it appears to make sense, it lumps places like The Woodlands and Alvin into the same category, which doesn't make sense. I'm going to try to work out some kind of radial system, with The Loop as its own place still, then directions like North, Northwest, South, Southeast, etc... But I want to refine that before I go making things any messier. One sad note: When I was moving things around, I accidentally killed the Woodlands, Kindwood, and Northern Pines heading. The messages aren't gone; they landed in the Other Houston Neighborhoods area, so I'll have to move them back to their new homes when the new categories get sorted out. Sorry about that. If you have any thoughts on whether a radial distribution of sections makes any sense, let me know.

Sorry about the pictures in this thread, guys. A company called Large Arts in Collingwood, Australia demands that we not show renderings of this property: There's a lot of things I could say about this, but since I'm not the owner of this site, I will keep my thoughts to myself.

I'm OK with this. I'll put it on the list. I think using quotes is a good idea anyway when searching for phrases. It should always provide better, faster results. Interesting that you noticed the system ignores numbers. From a technical standpoint, I can think of a couple of reasons why this might be done. But again, quotation marks is the way to go anyway.

I think just send me a list of links for each section. I should be able to move things around from there. Possibly. E-mail is a tricky thing these days. The spam companies have become so aggressive that it's hard to legitimate e-mail from a place like HAIF to get around. I'll poke around and see if there's anything else I can do. That seems easy and logical. I'll add it to the "easy" list. It should be there soon...ish.

Eep! Other things... I tweaked some search settings. So now when you search for Marvin Zindler, you only get results with both Marvin and Zindler, instead of every post with Marvin in it. I made two new neighborhood sections: Third Ward and University of Houston and I added East Houston to the East End section. Now comes the task of moving a bunch of posts into there to seed it. Since I'm not all that familiar with the neighborhood, anyone who wants to nominate posts to move, please let me know. I have enabled lazy loading of images. Broadly speaking, I'm against that sort of thing, but it should help speed up page loading, and that's a good thing. Unfortunately, it won't work for most of the threads already posted — only mostly for new threads. Also, if you see a page jumping around during load, that's because someone posted an image in the thread that's from an outside web site, and there's no way to know what size the picture is until it arrives.

What rebuilding the search index looks like.

Another note - There were some complaints about search not working properly. I'm in the process of rebuilding the entire search index. It should take a few hours. Or maybe many hours. Well, a while, because there's eighty-three brazillion messages on HAIF. Hopefully this will help.

They were actually removed by the people who make the forum software. Apparently doing all that forward-looking is a major drag on the database. I'm afraid I don't know enough about it to tell them they're wrong. Hi everyone. I'm still ticking through the complaints list. (Complaints in a good way, not in the "I'd like to speak to your supervisor" way.) One of the ones that came in was this: What's going on with the image compressions? Many of the images, no matter how small or big or how old or new, are fuzzy or plain crappy looking on the forum since the server switch. I've begun to include a direct link below the images I repost as a workaround. Images take up bandwidth for sure, but can this be fixed? I'm sorry I don't remember who wrote it - I've just been copying items from the forum into a to-do list. Can anyone link to an example of where this is a problem? That would help me start investigating what's causing it.