I would not disagree with the notion that there needs to be thoughtful, intellectually honest, and carefully constructed regulation. However, the post to which I was initially responding sounded like the tirade of a communist revolutionary. Somebody needed to prod you into at least admitting that greed is good. Ironically, though, the nature of our representative democracy has resulted in a one-party government with an exceptionally weak and confused minority, and I suspect that the situation will probably result in a knee-jerk regulatory changes that are not as thoughtful, intellectually honest, or carefully constructed as they ought to be. Also, this post has a lot of overtones based in baseless morality and appeals to popularity. How about we drop the rhetoric and just be intellectually honest? That goes for the other guys on here, too, but at least they're making an attempt to stay on topic.