Jump to content

POST: Mixed-Use Development At 401 Franklin St.


sevfiv

Recommended Posts

I think the old county courthouse renovation was $38 million, for comparison. This will likely fund some practical renovations to make the warehouse area suited for retail tenants in a very raw, industrial environment, with maybe some parking lot landscaping and signage. My guess.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Quote

Lovett will develop the 16-acre property at 401 Franklin St. into a mixed-use development with "a host of retail and entertainment spaces" including a food hall and market, a live music venue, art exhibits, restaurants, bars, coworking space and a park on the building's rooftop, a Lovett spokesperson told the Houston Business Journal.

 

Quote

A construction timeline wasn't provided, nor was information on any contractors working on the property.

 

That was all the information in the article. The rest was background we already knew

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

After years of silence, Houston-based Lovett Commercial has revealed finalized plans for the former downtown Houston post office property the company purchased in 2015.

Quote

Lovett is leasing the property and there are "multiple letters of intent on the table," the spokesperson said.

Also from the article. 

 

I suppose its an announcement of finalized plans.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to a downtown retail leasing broker a few months ago who confided her concerns about this project. She said she knew the owner and didn't think he was the right person for it. Take this for what it's worth, just someone's opinion. But from what we are seeing, it looks like they are essentially trying to lease it out for whatever money they can get without investing too much into it. And occasionally putting out renderings and what not to create interest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like we have had a few co-working spaces pop into the market recently, but I really don't have an idea of how much demand is out there for those things, so maybe that works.

 

I feel more confident that we can reach food hall saturation downtown without one more all the way over there.  Putting one effectively out of foot traffic range for office workers seems like an even worse idea than competing against the other three that are yet to open their doors,  one of which is not yet even actively building out. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Nate99 said:

Seems like we have had a few co-working spaces pop into the market recently, but I really don't have an idea of how much demand is out there for those things, so maybe that works.

 

High demand. Very high demand. Most of the coworking spaces get taken up quickly in this city and people are packed into tight office spaces. That's why there's demand for even more with several more on the horizon. Think the most recent one was announced on the west side of the Heights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in their report, BisNow [mis]informs us that the property opened in 1936!  SMH

 

"The property, which opened in 1936, includes a 500K SF office building and a two-story industrial building."

Read more at: https://www.bisnow.com/houston/news/mixed-use/lovett-commercial-announces-plans-for-former-downtown-post-office-91299?be=wdm5%40georgetown.edu&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tue-31-jul-2018-000000-0400_houston-re?utm_source=CopyShare&utm_medium=Browser

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, H-Town Man said:

I talked to a downtown retail leasing broker a few months ago who confided her concerns about this project. She said she knew the owner and didn't think he was the right person for it. Take this for what it's worth, just someone's opinion. But from what we are seeing, it looks like they are essentially trying to lease it out for whatever money they can get without investing too much into it. And occasionally putting out renderings and what not to create interest.

 

 

I totally believe this, I believed it from the moment I read Lovett had bought the complex. Lovett doesn’t have the urban density know how or track record to deal with what should obviously be a dense urban project. The fact that they’ve dwadled on this project for years now, with squat to show, further proves to me that they are the wrong developer for this property.  A company like Midway or a similar developer, who has the proven experience, would have been the right choice for this one of a kind property. Lovett’s only background is small urban strip centers, suburban strip centers, overpriced townhomes and sitting on undeveloped land for years. This project is simply too large and important for such an inexperienced developer IMO. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BigFootsSocks said:

Uhhhhh Sawyer Yards??? They’re doing a damn fine job over there. 

 

Idk, I’m getting the feeling that some here are still a little salty about Lovett demanding their renderings be removed the site :lol:

 

To this point...

 

Sawyer Yards is turning out great. And it is taking a very long time to deliver (piece by piece). I feel like they have done a quality job.

 

I am/was hopeful that Lovett grows with this development. I would love them to start doing some mixed use / higher density stuff.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2018 at 4:21 PM, Houston19514 said:

in their report, BisNow [mis]informs us that the property opened in 1936!  SMH

 

"The property, which opened in 1936, includes a 500K SF office building and a two-story industrial building."

Read more at: https://www.bisnow.com/houston/news/mixed-use/lovett-commercial-announces-plans-for-former-downtown-post-office-91299?be=wdm5%40georgetown.edu&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tue-31-jul-2018-000000-0400_houston-re?utm_source=CopyShare&utm_medium=Browser

 

There is a portion of the building towards the front that was designed and constructed in the 1930's. If you look at the curved drive-in ramp of the structure, you'll see the original 1930's portion of the structure. Ive attached a screen shot of the site from 1944 to 2017. You'll see the original 1930's building in both images. 

 

 

1944 v 2017.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Purdueenginerd said:

 

There is a portion of the building towards the front that was designed and constructed in the 1930's. If you look at the curved drive-in ramp of the structure, you'll see the original 1930's portion of the structure. Ive attached a screen shot of the site from 1944 to 2017. You'll see the original 1930's building in both images. 

 

 

1944 v 2017.png

 

That's fascinating.  I never realized that.  It would have been behind and  to the east of the old Southern Pacific train station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Purdueenginerd said:

 

There is a portion of the building towards the front that was designed and constructed in the 1930's. If you look at the curved drive-in ramp of the structure, you'll see the original 1930's portion of the structure. Ive attached a screen shot of the site from 1944 to 2017. You'll see the original 1930's building in both images. 

 

 

1944 v 2017.png

 

LOL  I'm sure that's what the "reporter" was referring to.  ;)

 

Interesting information.  Thanks for posting. (But it doesn't justify the journalist's misinformation.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Purdueenginerd said:

It was a post office building in 1936 as well. The expansion,  which reflects the majority of the property was expanded in the 1960s. 

 

Was that building built in 1936? There were rail operations (and a station) on site long before that date...

Edited by Houston19514
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/3/2018 at 10:15 AM, Houston19514 said:

 

Was that building built in 1936? There were rail operations (and a station) on site long before that date...

 

The Post office that we see today was constructed in the 1960s, with the exception of the portion I pointed out. That was built circa 1936, and its original function was also a post office. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little birdy has told me that they had seen the renderings of this project and that they were "next level".

 

I mentioned about the low planned renovation cost mentioned here and they said that he didn't think it was close to possible with the renderings they saw.

 

Don't want to stoke the fires with non-info, but I'm excited about the possibilities. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wilcal said:

A little birdy has told me that they had seen the renderings of this project and that they were "next level".

 

I mentioned about the low planned renovation cost mentioned here and they said that he didn't think it was close to possible with the renderings they saw.

 

Don't want to stoke the fires with non-info, but I'm excited about the possibilities. 

 

 

 

Are you sure it's not just those concept renderings that we saw on here awhile back? Different phases, kind of sketchy (in multiple ways)...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, H-Town Man said:

 

Are you sure it's not just those concept renderings that we saw on here awhile back? Different phases, kind of sketchy (in multiple ways)...

 

 

It's possible. If someone is connected though, it would be them. They have several projects in town and have worked for a large Houston developer (although not the one on this porject) so they are likely very well connected.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...