lockmat Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 (edited) This would pretty sweet if built, and it's design is different from the usual Woodlands building. Designed by Pickard Chilton http://www.bizjourna...allery&img_no=1 http://www.bizjourna...-woodlands.html Edited September 7, 2012 by lockmat 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Wow so there are two condo high rise proposals along the waterway.http://impactnews.com/articles/woodlands-development-company-plans-large-scale-town-center-projects10 Waterway was mentioned in this article:http://app.newsletter.bisnow.com/e/es.aspx?s=2636&e=9628&elq=b4a6a7105cb4433da3dc32a86f82d594It says that it is going to be 600k SF I assumed it would be a office building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted September 7, 2012 Author Share Posted September 7, 2012 oops, you're right. I don't know what made me think it was a condo tower. I guess it looks like it could pass for one. I have a ticket in to editor to have the title changed. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 I don't think that's the location of the 600k building. I think that might be a new rendering for the condo tower. The location looks about right for the condo tower. Not sure tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 No the location of the condo tower is across the water on the other side. It will abutt the waterway square parking garage Close to 3 & 4 waterway square place and be behind a proposed hotel.In the following link there is a photo that shows the location as number 11.http://www.thewoodlands-commercial.com/pdf/wwsq_brochure.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 yup. that must be the 600k square foot building. howard hughes sucks. they are going to completely f up the waterway square plan by placing a really tall building right on the waterway. it takes away from the human scale originally planned around waterway square.. they are going for bang for the buck. it dwarfs the brownstones and lofts. i can see they are giddy to maximize profits at the cost of good planning. just stick the most square footage where the demand is greatest regardless of the scale. ridiculous. booooooo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 It is interesting that they decided to build one 600k SF building when they still have other parcels of land to still build on. I wonder why they decided to build such a large building when they could build several smaller sized buildings on their other parcels. Maybe they have a company in mind that is looking for that amount of SF. I also find it interesting that they decided to break ground on their Hughes Landing development before building out their entire Waterway Square development. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 that's just it fortune........there were three shorter buildings planned for the "super block" on the south side of waterway square...that opened up to and complimented waterway square on the north and now this monstrosity. it wouldn't bother me so much if it was offset from the waterway, like 24 waterway in front of the fountain. 24 waterway is 14 stories and set back. the hotel will be similar to 24 waterway in height (at least it was, who knows now).i can't tell from the rendering, but retail on the first floor and around the second fountain would soften it at the pedestrian level. at least that may still happen.it just rubs me wrong....like "hughes landing" at lake woodlands. they are abandoning even the "woodlands way" of naming things. hughes landing is a pr name for the howard hughes corporation. just stupid.don't get me wrong...i love a new tall structure just for the childlike satisfaction it brings; but why mess with a good thing? 10 waterway is TOO TALL for that location. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 Yea these articles mention the three shorter buildings and the extension of Waterway Square south, there is even a rendering of the buildings. They are dated from February of this year so hopefully they will still be built. http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/woodlands/news/waterway-square-extension-targeted-for/article_f8e287bd-9fde-56d4-b37a-59fdbc5aebd9.html?mode=storyhttp://www.bizjournals.com/houston/morning_call/2012/02/the-woodlands-considers-developing.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 if you look at the map, the three shorter building are on timberloch. the big building, 10 waterway, looks like a mixed use with parking. residential brownstones or townhomes lining the waterway square "extension" from the waterway to timberloch and more residential on the south side of timberloch behind the three shorter buildings. oh well, i wonder if they will have pre-construction discounts on the residential....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Is the scaling off? That doesn't look like a 600k foot building to me---especially when compared to the SMALLER Anadarko towers. Anybody? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 24 waterway is 308,000 square feet including the retail, 14 stories on the right of the picture above. 10 waterway avenue is at least 20 stories tall with a larger floor plate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted September 12, 2012 Author Share Posted September 12, 2012 If they are 25k floor plates, that's 4 floors for every 100k of sqft. 6x4 is 24 floors. I think that's about what this tower is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 the existing anadarko tower is 800,000 square feet with what appears to be a narrower floor plate; hence the taller structure. also, consider that 10 waterway avenue may have retail facing the waterway, the extended waterway square south and facing waterway avenue......around the perimeter of the parking garage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 that's just it fortune........there were three shorter buildings planned for the "super block" on the south side of waterway square...that opened up to and complimented waterway square on the north and now this monstrosity. it wouldn't bother me so much if it was offset from the waterway, like 24 waterway in front of the fountain. 24 waterway is 14 stories and set back. the hotel will be similar to 24 waterway in height (at least it was, who knows now).i can't tell from the rendering, but retail on the first floor and around the second fountain would soften it at the pedestrian level. at least that may still happen.it just rubs me wrong....like "hughes landing" at lake woodlands. they are abandoning even the "woodlands way" of naming things. hughes landing is a pr name for the howard hughes corporation. just stupid.don't get me wrong...i love a new tall structure just for the childlike satisfaction it brings; but why mess with a good thing? 10 waterway is TOO TALL for that location.well then you won't like the 45+ story tower they've "proposed" on super block east... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 well then you won't like the 45+ story tower they've "proposed" on super block east...Wow they have proposed a 45 story tower ? Are there any renderings or details about this proposal ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 well then you won't like the 45+ story tower they've "proposed" on super block east...you're kidding? right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boounce Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Yes. Please share. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 you're kidding? right?the amount of floors is a very rough estimation compared to the surrounding buildings... how likely is it? i have no clue... but that's what howard hughes corp has proposed in that location. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 which location? what are you calling "super block east"? are you referring to a published proposal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 http://www.thewoodlands-commercial.com/pdf/wwsq_brochure.pdf found superblock east. it appears there are two towers with distinct features outlined. i'm not sure where the estimate for a floor count is coming from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 http://www.thewoodla...sq_brochure.pdf found superblock east. it appears there are two towers with distinct features outlined. i'm not sure where the estimate for a floor count is coming from. well obviously not from that Super block east abutting I-45... it looked nearly twice the height of anadarko's new tower. like i said, it could very well be a pie-in-the-sky "proposal" on HHC's part, but that's what they have depicted on the material i've seen. i have zero knowledge of it beyond that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 there is a new rendering floating around for 10 waterway. apparently, it's been in houston business journal. i haven't come across a digital copy. i saw it at the economic outlook conference last month. has anyone seen this new rendering or have a copy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted April 5, 2013 Author Share Posted April 5, 2013 I get the hbj and I have not seen it but I must admit I've been lax in my reading of it lately. The other day when you were asking for the rendering in the digital copy it wasn't in the hard, but I'll double check. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted April 5, 2013 Author Share Posted April 5, 2013 I just checked the last four editions and did not see it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 HHC was reworking the design of 10 waterway to make it more cost-effective, ie cheaper. don't recall seeing a new rendering but i'm assuming that's what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 thanks for sharing lockmat! it looks a little too much like the bbva building in the galleria. add to that swtsig's comment, and i'm not too excited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Stonian Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 (edited) Actually this one looks more like Energy Center III that broke ground in the Energy Corridor this January rather than the new BBVA building near the Galleria. Almost an exact copy (with slight modifications) so probably the same architect. http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/blog/breaking-ground/2013/01/keep-an-eye-on-energy-center-three.html?s=image_gallery Edited April 6, 2013 by HOUSTONIAN (N-ATL) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Is there an accompanying article with the rendering ? If so what did it say ? Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted April 6, 2013 Author Share Posted April 6, 2013 No it was just an advertisement in the hbj. It is 20 stories and it gives other details about the building. Nothing interesting. I took the attached screen shot after I gave bachanon the other. My bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.