Houston And Pro Soccer Are a perfect fit
#1
Posted Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 9:23 AM
This message has been edited to remove copyrighted material.
Please do not post copyrighted photos or articles from newspapers or magazines. We have already received a warning from the Houston Chronicle, and the legal departments of other publications have visited the site. If you would like to discuss a published article, please summarize the article and provide a link to the original source.
-------------------
-- Howard Hughes describing his way of working and the mistakes made in building the "Spruce Goose."
My Cafepress Store
#2
Posted Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 9:59 AM
Thats fine with me. I just hope the NHL recovers or another hockey league rises up.
Daniel Webster
"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President."
- Theodore Roosevelt
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism."
- Thomas Jefferson
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from the government."
- Thomas Paine
#3
Posted Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 11:39 AM
#4
Posted Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 11:59 PM
One must understand that such an experiment in Houston could work, and that besides building a team that will have cross cultural support, there must be a forward thinking stadium plan.
Ideally, a solution along the lines of Home Depot Center in L.A., which consists of a fan-friendly 25 000 seat stadium and a practice field complex. Considering how short Houston is on park space anyway, any addition where fans can not only enjoy a game in an intimate setting, along with fields where youth leagues can flourish would be a welcome addition.
As far as where to build it, does the huge Reliant parking lot have enough space for this? It is on the light rail line and is rather convenient from pretty much all of the city.
#5
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 12:28 AM
#6
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 2:56 AM
I agree, however I believe the current Astrodome is too large. Another issue is to determine if the future soccer stadium would be an enclosable facility like Reliant. I think not, as perhaps it would be too small to be economically feasible.
So ideally; demolish the Astrodome, build a purpose built soccer stadium with training fields (or borrow the Texans facility), and reserve Reliant for future World Cup/ US National/ International prestige matches.
#7
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 3:09 AM
And I agree with you Volvo on they could borrow the Texans facility.
#8
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 3:15 AM
#9
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 4:27 AM
Soccer regulations demand natural grass. No exceptions. Then, roping off the upper levels of the stadium creates a cavernous, empty feel. It would dwarf any other stadium in the league and destroy any attempt at atmosphere. Any additional work on the Dome would really be unecessary and an expense that the new team could not finance. A hotel? So what happens when there are no teams staying? Hotel occupancy is hovering over 57%, so new rooms in a new hotel sitting in a parking lot with nothing else to do would be a waste. Understand that the leading MLS franchise has an annual player payroll of 3 Million! Roger Clemons alone will make that come mid-June! So not a lot of cash for them to burn before the first match.
#10
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 6:44 AM
But they have done it before.
They at 35K+ SRO for one of the Mexican soccer matches.
#12
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 12:39 PM
#13
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 1:37 PM
Daniel Webster
"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President."
- Theodore Roosevelt
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism."
- Thomas Jefferson
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from the government."
- Thomas Paine
#14
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 2:34 PM
and i don't think the weather here would be a problem for playing outdoor. the season is from april to october, sure it would be hot, but most days wouldn't be any hotter than dallas, and it usually only rains in the afternoons and clears out in the evenings. no different from east coast florida.
hooligans are key, we may have to import some until we get it right.
#15
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 4:41 PM
#16
Posted Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 6:23 PM
bothers me that the dome wasn't even mentioned as an option in that article, when much of it focused on a lack of location to play.
if reliant's too costly to operate for soccer, wouldn't the dome be in the same boat?
#17
Posted Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 2:51 PM
Shameless Promotion: Flickr
#18
Posted Tuesday, March 22, 2005 at 12:50 AM
http://www.mlsnet.com/MLS/index.jsp
#19
Posted Tuesday, March 22, 2005 at 1:09 AM
"Hope is a good thing, maybe the best thing, and no good thing ever dies" - Shawshank Redemption
The Blue Collar Bugle - We don't wait for news to happen, we 'make' it happen
#20
Posted Tuesday, March 22, 2005 at 2:40 AM
I'm all for soccer in Houston, but let's find a way to do it in existing facilities if possible. I'm not sure we can afford a fourth brand new stadium right now with the existing funding mechanisms.
#21
Posted Tuesday, March 22, 2005 at 10:33 AM
#23
Posted Tuesday, March 29, 2005 at 12:19 PM
largeTEXAS, on Tuesday, March 29th, 2005 @ 10:22am, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I totally agree. I even like it better than the casino idea. It would be cool to geat a hotel room on the upper level and watch a game from your room (with a bunch of friends and drinks. This would be a one of a kind facility.
You better watch out or someont might steal that idea.
#24
Posted Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 12:29 AM
This would be the most state-of-the-Art soccer facility in all North America. It would also be a $400 Million stadium project, because $400 million IS the amount that the Astrodome Redevelopment Corp. had promised to revitalize a hotel- primary Astrodome in the first place, right? What'd make it so successful would be the fact that it could be used 24/7 as a hotel, with the soccer partly used for advertisement for the facility. Yes, it'd be costly to play soccer in the dome, but with a steady attendance and a successful hotel, I think the dome could actually PROFIT.
Oh, and 27, I'm ALL for that Rodeo Houston idea. If that happened, they'd REALLY grow into something unprecedented. I nominate 27 to lead the way on it, too. That whole list kicked ass.
#25
Posted Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 7:57 AM
One aspect of 27's comments I violently disagree with: NO museum for the Oilers. Our tax money is still paying for the "improvements" to the Dome that they demanded in order to stay, before they left anyway. We shouldn't be honoring traitors that way!
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#26
Posted Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 10:38 PM
I wonder if MLS is really going to be in expansion mode again as soon as 2007. They were eliminating teams as recently as 2002, right? It probably depends on how the two new teams do. As much as I would love to redo the Dome, isn't MLS holding out for promises of new soccer-specific fields (which is why Salt Lake City picked up an expansion team)? The Astrodome's just too big.
Yo check it. I agree the Astrodome is too big for MLS, but only if nothing was done to it. If a hotel/stadium deal happened, and the stadium still had more seats available than the average MLS stadium, AND it were state-of-the-art (we gotta stay ahead of the game with our archetecture, yo), then the size would be PERFECT.
All that would have to be done after that is one thing; fan support of the team, and create the largest fanbase for a local soccer team in America (which can be done). Houston loves PLAYING soccer, but watching it could become a sport in itself, which we've seen in almost all the other contries in the world. We Houstonians just have to learn how to enjoy attending games as much as we love to be playing it, and there's NO WAY we would lose money on the hotel/stadium idea.
Oh, and 27 kicks ass.
#27
Posted Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 2:39 AM
tw2ntyse7en, on Tuesday, April 5th, 2005 @ 10:10pm, said:
Booyakasha!! Me name be DJ V and me come straight from da WestSide of H-town, aaaiigghhttt?! MAD respect to 27 for the intellect! I must agree that I remind me for Ali G, except I'm black...and I'm Texan...and I..um..wear less Fubu. Recognize!
Also, 27 brought up the most valiant point as to why MLS would be successful here in da Bayou City. Diversity. It's what I love about Houston more than almost anything else. Professional soccer WILL be successful here, so long as that organization appeals to all, and not a particular target audience.
I got two questions. One, what's up with this trend going on in MLS with PROFESSIONAL teams signing on long term to play in High School Football stadiums? Dallas, exibit A. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but I'm trying to understand the strategy they have for making MLS as big an organization as the NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, and NASA. (hey, they build space ships, you know).
Also, Question Two: No disrespekt to da American Soccer announcers, but where's the excitement of watching the game on t.v.? I LOVE watching spanish stations for the games, 'cause the commentators get into it. GOOOOOOOOOOOLLLL!!!!! Where's our excitement when USA scores? If USA's announcers lose control, soccer has a great chance here. Does anyone agree?
Oh, and Respect to Subdude!!
#28
Posted Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 5:39 PM
It's mind-numbingly slow because as a casual observer you have no stake in the action. Get behind a team and watch a few matches and you will see the difference. Unlike most sports popular in the US, a soccer match can be won or lost in a span of just a few minutes. And those few minutes can come at any point in a 3 hour match. Think the final 2 minutes in a tied game of basketball. In soccer, that two minutes lasts three hours. Good luck thinking you can turn away from the action whenever you want to for a beer, bathroom break, cigarette, etc. That's what makes it the World's most popular sport.
#29
Posted Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 5:55 PM
goldenstick, on Tuesday, March 22nd, 2005 @ 12:50am, said:
http://www.mlsnet.com/MLS/index.jsp
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No dissrespect intended, but why don't we knock down Rigley field whle were at it. Tearing down the Dome for a soccer team would be a travesty. That's some of the problem I've noticed in Houston's architecture, theres no loyalty to past culture.
I've seen some old pics of this city and there was some fantastic stuff 50 and 60 years ago. The Shamrock is a perfect example.
There are plenty of areas to make this work but good night don't knock down the eighth wonder of the world.
#30
Deleted User:
/danax/
Posted Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 7:47 PM
Gary, on Wednesday, April 6th, 2005 @ 5:55pm, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree. I can't be that big of a deal to convert it into a great soccer stadium, considering how much a new one would cost. The problem is most likely more due to lack of interest than money. To most people, the Astrodome is just a tired old relic. People get excited about NEW, whereas the enjoyment one gets from something with a little history is more subtle.
It's a great spot too with rail already right there, although I think that if they want to be forward thinking in terms of where the immigrant Hispanic population will be in 30 years they should look way outside the loop.
#31
Posted Friday, April 15, 2005 at 1:25 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/mls/news?slug=mlss...ov=st&type=lgns
#32
Posted Friday, April 15, 2005 at 7:33 PM
htownswami, on Friday, April 15th, 2005 @ 12:25pm, said:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mls/news?slug=mlss...ov=st&type=lgns
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We can still have an MLS team in the near future if San Antonio had a team in '06, but it just wouldn't be in '06, yo. The only thing Houston doesn't have for a team is a deticated investment group and/or ownership that's willing to build or renovate a stadium for primary soccer purpose. We got the fans, yo. We just need a fan that's a mulit-million dollar fan to exist in Houston.
#33
Posted Saturday, April 16, 2005 at 11:30 AM
DJ V Lawrence, on Friday, April 15th, 2005 @ 7:33pm, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
First post here......let me give you and other a little heplfull info.
There is an investor who has the ball rolling in Houston, hence all the talk aobut the stadium on the NW side of town.
The investor is Club America of Mexico City.
Much like Chivas and there owner Jorge Vergara, they want in on one specific market. For Vergara, it was LA, and he got what he wanted. For Club America, its Houston becuase its a big market with a huge hispanic base that's close to Mexico, just like LA. They do not want to go to San antonio as they feel the market income per household is to low to aqudately support a franchise.
Hence, San Antonio is in negoations with Tigres, another Mexican club for ownership. There Mayor was recently in Mexico to meet with club officals
And BTW....the only reason why SA is in is becuase they gave the "tax-payer-funded" Alamodome away to the MLS by giving them FREE RENT and all concessions, parking. I'm confused.....Mayor Garza was doing this to have a tenant in the Dome to make money for the city of SA. How is SA gonna make money out of this deal?
And as for Houston's proposed SSS in the NW side of town.....root for it to happen as it will tie into plans to redevlope the old Northwest Mall inot one massive sports and entertainment year round complex.
#34
Posted Monday, April 18, 2005 at 8:34 AM
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#35
Posted Monday, April 18, 2005 at 3:56 PM
#36
Deleted User:
/danax/
Posted Monday, April 18, 2005 at 4:44 PM
tigereye, on Saturday, April 16th, 2005 @ 11:30am, said:
It will be interesting to see if the Mexican nationals get behind a team from Mexico City, which might be a rival team for a lot of them, since I don't think too many are from Mexico City. I could be wrong on that. Regardless of whether or not they are fans, those games should be sellouts.
#37
Posted Tuesday, April 19, 2005 at 8:20 AM
I'm surprised about the San Antonio announcement. MLS has already had to contract once, so it's odd they're adding expansion teams so fast.
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#39
Posted Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 6:53 PM
tigereye, on Saturday, April 16th, 2005 @ 11:30am, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Remember when I said this......its now falling into place......that is if they dont use the Astrodome and build at Delmar
NW Mall redevelopment thread
#40
Posted Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at 12:57 AM
tigereye, on Tuesday, May 17th, 2005 @ 5:53pm, said:
NW Mall redevelopment thread
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Personally, I prefer the Astrodome over Delmar or NW Mall. Soccer in the Dome would kill two birds with one stone for Harris County, Soccer, and the City of Houston, since we ARE trying to decide what to do with the Dome.
And besides, Delmar stadium is a HIGH SCHOOL stadium. I don't see the Rockets, Astros, or Texans playing in High School stadiums for home games. If we really think that lowly of soccer in Houston, we shouldn't have a team in the first place.
#41
Posted Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at 10:43 AM
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#42
Posted Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at 6:32 PM
Subdude, on Wednesday, May 18th, 2005 @ 10:43am, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Actually, form an engineering standpoint, the Dome would work for serving as a shell for an intimate 25,000 seat soccer stadium.
Back in its hey day, the Dome used to seat 42,000 when one end of the stadium was left open which made room for the scorebaord spectacular. If you subtract the other endzone, you easily shrink capacity to the nieghborhood of 30,000 or less. Open ended soccer stadiums are the popular designs for the MLS anyways. To further shrink capacity, the interior would need to be gutted and the concourses would need to be enlargerd, which would push the seating deck closer to the pitch. Overall, this would eliminate sections in the seating bowls design which could get you to the 25,000 mark.
What I would like to see done is for the the entire reliant campus be sectioned off into three rectulangular blocks. One for Reliant Center, the middle for stadiums, and the last one for parking. the Astrohall needs to be replaced by a Parking garage structure to serve soccer.
The parking lot east of the Dome needs to be raised for in favor of a retractable soccer pitch that could move in and out of the Dome to make it more multipurpose. The Dome's seating bowl needs to be as multipurpose as the Saitima Super Arena in Japan, which can change form a 40,000 seat soccer stadium to a 5,000 seat concert venue in the blink of an eye.
And last but not least...on the North end of the Dome that faces Reliant center, an air conditioned, sheltered walk way with moveable pathways like you find in airports needs to be built to connect Reliant Stadium and the Dome to the light rail line to make it more attractable to use for commuters. No one likes trudging across barron parking lots in the middle of the night to catch a train....wake up Metro.
This needs to be done.....nuff said.
#43
Posted Thursday, May 26, 2005 at 3:40 AM
tigereye, on Wednesday, May 18th, 2005 @ 5:32pm, said:
Back in its hey day, the Dome used to seat 42,000 when one end of the stadium was left open which made room for the scorebaord spectacular. If you subtract the other endzone, you easily shrink capacity to the nieghborhood of 30,000 or less. Open ended soccer stadiums are the popular designs for the MLS anyways. To further shrink capacity, the interior would need to be gutted and the concourses would need to be enlargerd, which would push the seating deck closer to the pitch. Overall, this would eliminate sections in the seating bowls design which could get you to the 25,000 mark.
What I would like to see done is for the the entire reliant campus be sectioned off into three rectulangular blocks. One for Reliant Center, the middle for stadiums, and the last one for parking. the Astrohall needs to be replaced by a Parking garage structure to serve soccer.
The parking lot east of the Dome needs to be raised for in favor of a retractable soccer pitch that could move in and out of the Dome to make it more multipurpose. The Dome's seating bowl needs to be as multipurpose as the Saitima Super Arena in Japan, which can change form a 40,000 seat soccer stadium to a 5,000 seat concert venue in the blink of an eye.
And last but not least...on the North end of the Dome that faces Reliant center, an air conditioned, sheltered walk way with moveable pathways like you find in airports needs to be built to connect Reliant Stadium and the Dome to the light rail line to make it more attractable to use for commuters. No one likes trudging across barron parking lots in the middle of the night to catch a train....wake up Metro.
This needs to be done.....nuff said.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm TOTALLY against the thought of us submitting to a 20,000 seat stadium for soccer in Houston. The New Orleans Saints are hurting because they have sold ONLY 25,000 season tickets. Soccer's the biggest sport in the world, and if Houstonians can't fill a stadium of 40,000 seats for a soccer team, we should just forget about trying to have a team at all.
And I'm all against this High School stadium thing. If it's a PROFESSIONAL LEAGUE, play in a PROFESSIONAL LOCATION with PROFESSIONAL MONEY and PROFESSIONAL SPONSORSHIP. 20,000 seat stadiums are what they use for BASKETBALL and HOCKEY ARENAS. 20,000 is NOT an exceptable baseball or football attendance, and it shouldn't be for a marketable league like the MLS. Screw trying to have sell-out games. Get MORE PEOPLE INVOLVED.
Either Houstonian love soccer, or they don't. Fill up a 40,000+ soccer stadium nightly in Houston, or just don't have a team if you think 40,000 Houstonians are not interested. End of story.
Last question. If we get a soccer team for Houston, will you (the person reading this) support that team passionately like we have for the Texans, Astros, Comets, and Rockets, and would you buy season tickets and actually go to the games, or are you only hoping to have a team to have one, and are banking on OTHER Houstonians to go to the game instead of you
#44
Posted Thursday, May 26, 2005 at 12:18 PM
#45
Posted Thursday, May 26, 2005 at 12:20 PM
"so if one does not pay more for a house they are incapable of caring about their childs education......boy that is good to know :rolleyes:" - TexasVines
#46
Posted Thursday, May 26, 2005 at 4:34 PM
Quote
And I'm all against this High School stadium thing. If it's a PROFESSIONAL LEAGUE, play in a PROFESSIONAL LOCATION with PROFESSIONAL MONEY and PROFESSIONAL SPONSORSHIP. 20,000 seat stadiums are what they use for BASKETBALL and HOCKEY ARENAS. 20,000 is NOT an exceptable baseball or football attendance, and it shouldn't be for a marketable league like the MLS. Screw trying to have sell-out games. Get MORE PEOPLE INVOLVED.
Either Houstonian love soccer, or they don't. Fill up a 40,000+ soccer stadium nightly in Houston, or just don't have a team if you think 40,000 Houstonians are not interested. End of story.
Last question. If we get a soccer team for Houston, will you (the person reading this) support that team passionately like we have for the Texans, Astros, Comets, and Rockets, and would you buy season tickets and actually go to the games, or are you only hoping to have a team to have one, and are banking on OTHER Houstonians to go to the game instead of you ? Answer soon, yo...
I don't quite see the logic of benchmarking MLS attendance against baseball or football attendance. They're different animals. MLS simply isn't as popular, so if 20,000 is an appropriate size, then so be it. If it fits well in a high school stadium, then use the high school stadium. Why would we want to spend the money constructing a sporting facility that seats more than its expected usage would require? As I said, I really don't see the logic. Building stadiums that make economic sense isn't "submitting", it's just common sense. Also, remember that a couple of MLS teams have already had to fold. We don't want to overspend on facilities on an unproved product.
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#47
Posted Thursday, May 26, 2005 at 7:40 PM
Subdude, on Thursday, May 26th, 2005 @ 3:34pm, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
...but also remember that some MLS games have filled NFL stadiums to capacity (70,000+), but for some reason, they are talking about building 20,000-seat stadiums for those same teams. Where's the logic?
Subdude, I understand completely where you're coming from. It truly does make sense. My point is this: if you're gonna do something, do it right. You're right, two teams have folded. You know why? Because the league automatically assumed that because those cities had a large Hispanic population, it would just automatically survive. That doesn't work. What the league needs to do is stop living in the taboo that only one ethnic background love soccer, and they have to come up with ways to cater to ALL races. Create a soccer interest that doesn't exist in corporate America and Urban America instead of assuming that because you're of certain background, you will attend games.
That ideology will NOT work in Houston. I heard they're talking about building a soccer venue for MLS at Delmar Stadium. For what reason? You tell me. You mean to tell me that because I'm not Hispanic, I'm not allowed to have the MLS advertise their team to me? If you won't advertise soccer to me now, when will you? And what if, just if, the East End didn't attend games. Who would fill the seats then? 5th Ward? River Oaks? Bellaire? Katy? Sugarland? Who ELSE are you teaching the art of soccer to?
Push for the ENTIRE city of Houston to go to games the way Bob McNair did when the Texans did their inagural season. After watching what he did, I think there's NOTHING Houston can't do in terms of marketability and enthusiasm.
#48
Posted Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 12:05 PM
I think the Astrodome would be perfect for soccer, and if the Harris Sports authority allows it to, the city could add a moving pitch for grass to be natural and for it to grow faster, like the Sapporo Dome in Japan.Plus the Astrodome could be used for other events too. I rather leave the Astrodome as a sports venue than a hotel.
#49
Posted Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 12:19 PM
Why not offer it as a Sports venue AND a hotel for those enthusiasts that LIVE for a particular sport or event?
I've recently had clients that flew in all the way From Germany for the Billy Idol Concert (of all artists!) and would leave the next morning back to germany.
The same thing happened with the Kelly Clarkston concert (they flew from Ireland!) and were gone the next day.
The same ting can be done with the for not only soccor, but other events.
Just update it a tad, improve the sound system, and boom! a new venue. It could "counter" program whatever is at the Stadium. Say that there is a Motocross thingie at the stadium, then there could be a concert at the dome, or vica versa...
Ricco
***
Want to kill American jobs? Shop at Walmart.
#50
Posted Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 12:59 PM
1. Much cheaper than retro-fitting Astrodome
2. 20,000 sounds just right to start with
3. Reliant has proved itself to be a wonderful venue for soccer when 70k seats are needed, it's there whenever you need it
4. If MLS explodes here and 20,000 isn't enough, it can always be moved to Reliant

Help











































HAI Community
