MainPlace in downtown Houston aka "Hines 47"
#2
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 8:11 AM
#3
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 8:13 AM
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill
Willomena Slater goin ghetto on Betty Suarez..."come on girl, i'm black and you're mexican. let's not talk around it like a couple of dull white people"
#4
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 8:24 AM
Montagu Hotel topic.
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#6
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 9:01 AM
This post has been edited by Jax: Friday, July 13, 2007 at 9:03 AM
#7
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 9:06 AM
>
#8
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 9:24 AM
Subdude, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 9:24am, said:
Montagu Hotel topic.
I bet it is. I'm surprised they are willing to go at it without a tenant; I guess they want to beat the Discovery Tower out of the ground. The rendering I saw looked pretty slick, it's an all glass tower with slightly angled walls, and a terrace garden two-thirds up the building.
#9
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 9:45 AM
#10
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 11:25 AM
#11
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 12:36 PM
fernz, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 9:24am, said:
Post the rendering or website. PLEASE!
#12
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:06 PM
Angled walls sounds intriguing!
Is the location, Main, Walker, Fannin, Rusk? (got that off the Montagu Hotel thread) On the satellite image, there looks to be several existing buildings on the lot.
#13
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:25 PM
#14
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:35 PM
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#15
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:46 PM
#16
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:52 PM
-------------
-----------------------
www.arch-ive.org
www.theperplexikon.com
www.atomichouston.com
house blog
#18
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:56 PM
Trae, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 1:55pm, said:
yes, six stories
well, six centerpoint stories
This post has been edited by sevfiv: Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:57 PM
-------------
-----------------------
www.arch-ive.org
www.theperplexikon.com
www.atomichouston.com
house blog
#19
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 1:56 PM
Subdude, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 1:35pm, said:
does it mean, necessarily, that the entire block will be used?
#20
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:01 PM
#21
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:06 PM
#23
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:18 PM
The Great Hizzy!, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 9:06am, said:
>
With our sour luck, it may end up being only 40 stories. There is something about project proposals and final products in Houston where the height is either shortened or a twin tower is reduced to one.
#24
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:32 PM
#25
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:34 PM
Pumapayam, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 3:18pm, said:
It would be better if we could delay the inevitable HAIF pessimism and doubts until we even see a rendering. Or Hines's website even mentions the project. We all are aware projects change as they go forth (or die) but it would be a much more pleasurable experience if we could learn just a little more before comments like that (true or not).
#26
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:36 PM
This post has been edited by Mister X: Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:39 PM
#27
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:38 PM
Quote
LOL
#28
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:49 PM
#29
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:54 PM
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#30
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 2:56 PM
shasta, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 2:32pm, said:
That's what I am hoping as well. Street level retail would be awesome - it's in an area where there is already a lot going on. I can't remmeber what is in the "New West Building". Is it just empty or does it have retail? It's not the building with the dollar store, is it?
#31
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:06 PM
JWW, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 2:34pm, said:
Too many nice projects get downsized. I am still perplexed who decided to remove the residential portion from the Pavilions project. I agree, and I do hope this project stay at a grand 47 stories.
Jax, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 2:56pm, said:
The city should mandate all new building incorporate it. What to point of having sidewalks and grids if 3 of the 4 sides of the block have nothing on them.
#32
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:07 PM
#33
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:11 PM
Maybe if the "New West Building" is torn down, the t-shirt / wig shop will move into the new building when they complete it!
#34
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:14 PM
Pumapayam, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 3:06pm, said:
Downtown still doesn't have that much of a market for retail to make it mandatory.
making it mandatory would mean that some great lobby spaces wouldn't be possible.
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill
Willomena Slater goin ghetto on Betty Suarez..."come on girl, i'm black and you're mexican. let's not talk around it like a couple of dull white people"
#35
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:15 PM
Jax, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 3:11pm, said:
It will be torn down, per HBJ.
#36
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:17 PM
Quote
Do we even have any buildings downtown with "great lobby space"? Many (like Wells Fargo) hardly have any, and what they have is not even worth looking at.
Edit: The old Chase bank lobby is lovely.
This post has been edited by MidtownCoog: Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM
#37
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:21 PM
Does the "New West Building" have any historical significance?
#38
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:22 PM
musicman, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 3:14pm, said:
I am sure they could disguise the lobby elevation with some staircase action up a floor and leave the entire first floor to retail.
#39
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:29 PM
Pumapayam, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 3:22pm, said:
...which results in a poor lobby. IMO adding retail on classic/classy buildings would be tacky in most instances.
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill
Willomena Slater goin ghetto on Betty Suarez..."come on girl, i'm black and you're mexican. let's not talk around it like a couple of dull white people"
#40
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM
Jax, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 3:21pm, said:
well, that's relative
it was built in 1912 as the Beatty Building (David R. Beatty - oil business) and designed by Henry C. Cooke (Magnolia Brewery).
the original James Coney Island location was there, too
here's a thread about a restoration that never happened:
http://www.houstonarchitecture.info/haif/i...?showtopic=1114
and a postcard from that thread:
This post has been edited by sevfiv: Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:47 PM
-------------
-----------------------
www.arch-ive.org
www.theperplexikon.com
www.atomichouston.com
house blog
#41
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:48 PM
Quote
That's assuming the lobby is on the ground floor. Allen Center's lobby is technically on the second floor, with (gasp) retail on the first. OK, the retail is a Fantastic Sams, Banc of America, etc. But still.
#42
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 3:53 PM
#43
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 4:41 PM
Jax, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 3:53pm, said:
that's why i said in most instances. if there was sufficient demand for retail, it would be built.
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill
Willomena Slater goin ghetto on Betty Suarez..."come on girl, i'm black and you're mexican. let's not talk around it like a couple of dull white people"
#44
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 4:55 PM
musicman, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 4:41pm, said:
at the risk of sounding silly, how is the demand determined?
-------------
-----------------------
www.arch-ive.org
www.theperplexikon.com
www.atomichouston.com
house blog
#45
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 5:08 PM
sevfiv, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 4:55pm, said:
silly? nope. there are numerous empty business spaces currently along main. if there was that much demand those business spaces would be taken up and i would believe that the hrs of the ones that are there currently would be extended beyond typical business hrs.
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill
Willomena Slater goin ghetto on Betty Suarez..."come on girl, i'm black and you're mexican. let's not talk around it like a couple of dull white people"
#46
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 5:19 PM
sevfiv, on Friday, July 13th, 2007 @ 4:55pm, said:
These fellows take a crack at it in a report comissioned for the Downtown Management District, but their conclusions are limited to the neighborhood level. It is a little off, I think, because there are a lot of different kinds of consumers represented in downtown Houston, the only one that really has a critical mass is office-oriented convenience retail. Dining has done fairly well because they can work the office crowd, hotel crowd, and some residents, but bars and entertainment establishments are in a state of flux right now, and it's hard to pin down that market. Destination retail, such as apparel stores, has always floundered in downtown. The Park Shops at Houston Center are doing terribly. Houston Pavilions could really make or break this segment in my estimation, and there is no foregone conclusion one way or the other.
The folks that did this study do not attempt to figure out the suitability of individual parcels for retail. Your question becomes more difficult when applied to a specific site within downtown Houston because of traffic (both public and private) and pedestrian volume and patterns, visibility, adjacency to various types of property, the levels of occupancy and upside opportunities for population and employment growth in adjacent and nearby properties, and of course physical suitability--the Wells Fargo Building is never going to have outdoor storefront retail, for instance, in spite of the density of the skyline district. To try and tackle all these issues, a broker/appraiser/developer looks at retail offerings that are most comparable to what is on his site and can observe how rapidly retail space has absorbed and the frequency of tenant turnover given the rents that those similar properties are charging.
This post has been edited by TheNiche: Friday, July 13, 2007 at 5:26 PM
#47
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 5:21 PM
With HP being so near by, and Macy's and American Apparel (?), it seems like downtown will become more busy in the next few years and it might be a good investment in that case. But I guess it's still a risk.
#48
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 5:34 PM
#49
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 5:39 PM
As of yet this block does not have a tunnel connection. I'm guessing that a connection will be made to the tunnel system through the 806 Main building. A project of this scope wouldn't be built without a connection. What I can see is a combination of tunnel and street retail, as in 1000 Main. That's not tacky, is it?
Also, according to the HBJ print edition, Hines intends that the new tower be LEED-certified. Good for them!
It is really amazing to see this kind of skyscraper activity going on - serious proposals from Hines, Brookwoods, and Trammel-Crow. This must be the first time since the 1980s when downtown has been booming like this. The HBJ article mentions that Trammel has an advantage with Disco Tower because they already own the land and it is surface parking so no demo necessary. The article has a quote that at least three of the proposed downtown projects will be built.
like the sun; it shines everywhere"
#50
Posted Friday, July 13, 2007 at 5:53 PM

Help























































HAI Community
