I also remember the Alvin Van Black show. It was a hoot. My dad clued me onto it. I used to pass the time on lazy summer afternoons waiting for him to go off on some luckless soul.
And one earlier poster was right - he'd let some real nuts go on and on then go nuclear on someone who actually made sense. That made the show all the more unpredictable and fun.
But another earlier poster was totally incorrect... the one who compared Alvin's show to both Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage.
While I don't mean to hijack the thread, I can tell immediately from that comment that particular poster has probably never listened to either of those shows. While that poster probably doesn't agree with Limbaugh (and that's his or her business, I don't really care), anyone who has ever listened to the show, like it or not, knows that Limbaugh mixes equal parts satire and commentary. It's both news and entertainment. To say his bits are merely rants is (and well if I'm offensive I guess I'm offensive) stupid and shows the person is merely aping what he or she has heard elsewhere without bothering to check it out for his or herself.
As for Savage's show, it has little in common with Rush's program or Alvin's old show, other than it was on the radio. Unlike Limbaugh, Savage isn't trying to be entertaining. Being a somewhat regular listener to Savage's show, I can say with authority that alot of what Savage says can indeed be classified as a rant. And being a somewhat regular listener to Rush, there is almost nothing similar between the two, other than a lot of people love to classify them together. There is nothing remotely funny about Savage's show and there's nothing entertaining about it. It can be thought provoking at times, but that's not always meant to be a compliment.
Alvin Van Black was a curmudgeon (sp), an irritable, grouchy rascal. He knew it and that added to his appeal. That's why people listened to him.
Rush Limbaugh is exactly what he proclaims to be - a harmless, lovable fuzzball. He has a schtick and he plays it well. Too bad so many judge him based on what others say rather than judge for themselves based on what they hear.
Micheal Savage ought to probably just shut up for his own good. Whatever valid points he makes he buries under what could well be considered hateful rants.
I've listened to all three in my life, enjoyed each of their shows for entirely different reasons, and I am in a position to pass judgement based on what I've heard. The opinion I've formed based on what I've heard, not on what someone else said about them or what is popular to say about them at the moment.
This post has been edited by Firebird65: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 at 4:47 PM